Working paper.
Japanese-only micro-entry from Tritransitive NegQ Group A contrast set (Negative_Questions_Pay_GroupA_Contrast_Set §4), sharing geometry with Lexical_Entry_Pay_Argument_Structure and the English payGIVE micro-entry. Optional-in / SHIBA denomination notes from the Disney+ pay companions. Constructed diagnostics diagnose particles, #P, and MeasureP; they are not spontaneous-speech citations. Mandarin / Navajo companions in the same DOCX are pointed only — this tick does not deepen them.
Constructed examples.
Frames below are packaging hypotheses aligned with Volume 4 Group A notes and Watanabe #P. Payment-true is e2 of payGIVE (Recipient HAS Amount). Goods-HAVE and invoice-clearance are not defaults of this root. Do not fake elicitation.
Class table.
Index 2 does not list Japanese under Payment. Like
sell · Japanese, this root sits
Beyond Index 2 as a Group A sense×language page. Neighbouring Index 2 classes (Risk /
kakeru) are not a translation of
payGIVE. English Payment citations remain on
pay.
Scout / deferred.
Mandarin 付 / 支付 (把-money + 给-Recipient) and Navajo money-HANDLE packaging share the Group A DOCX but are not micro-entries this tick. Companion shiharau / 支払う is packaging of the same GIVE geometry — not a second root invented here. No fake elicitation.
Hierarchy
Same inventory as English payGIVE. Not four-place. Surface count can name Pat, Chris, twenty dollars, and a lawnmower, but the lexicon does not list four co-arguments of √PAY_GIVE / √HARAU.
Intended labeling (shared with English)
√PAY_GIVE + ApplHAVE(Recipient, MeasurePAmount ⟨Amount, Denomination⟩) + Consideration PP
Voice introduces Payer. Low ApplHAVE introduces Recipient and relates Recipient to the MeasureP. √HARAU / proc takes MeasureP ⟨n, U⟩ as Incremental Theme of eHAVE — the money. Japanese spells Recipient as ni, Amount as o, Consideration as de / no-tame / daikin-to-shite — not a second o. Optional Platform / Source (wire channel, from-account) are Loc / FROM extras — not Theme₃ and not a sixth inner argument. Optional tame-ni Purpose is Type B stacked outside Consideration.
$20 = nijū-doru = one MeasureP. Orthography / #P morphology is not extra arity. Mensural nijū-doru on the Amount and optional sortal ichi-dai-bun on Consideration are two #Ps on two already-listed objects — they do not grow √HARAU. There is no sixth argument “currency symbol.”
What Group A Japanese changes is particle cloth and where Amount+Denomination host (#P under ACC o). What it does not change is the inventory. Twenty is still not dollars. Dollars is still not a sister of harau. Payment-true is still e2. Goods-HAVE is still missing. On sell, Recipient HAS goods and Price is de-MeasureP. On payGIVE, Recipient HAS Amount and Consideration is the PP.
Japanese frames · Case clothes
No English DOC / to-frame ACC flip. Amount stays o. Recipient is ni. Consideration stays outside a second ACC. Double-o blocks writing goods + money as two objects. Cheapness under Neg therefore tracks the o-MeasureP unless Focus / WH independently highlights Recipient or Consideration. Companion light verb shiharau / 支払う keeps the same cloth.
- ✓ Pat-ga Chris-ni nijū-doru-o harat-ta. NOM · DAT · ACC MeasureP · pay-PST
- ✓ Pat-wa Chris-ni nijū-doru-o harawanakatta no ka. canonical NegQ
- ✓ Pat-wa Chris-ni nijū-doru-o shibakariki-no daikin-to-shite harawanakatta no ka. Consideration PP · not second o
- ✓ Pat-wa nijū-doru-o haratta. Recipient omitted; Consideration independently omissible
- ✓ Seikyūsho-o harawanakatta no ka. payBILL pointer — document ACC
- * Pat-ga Chris-ni shibakariki-o nijū-doru-o harawanakatta. Double-o: goods ≠ second ACC
- * Seikyūsho-o nijū-doru-o harawanakatta. no DOC of bill + money
NegQ baseline (Japanese map · Group A §4)
✓ Pat-wa Chris-ni nijū-doru-o harawanakatta no ka.
✓ Nani-o harawanakatta no ka. MeasureP
✓ Dare-ni harawanakatta no ka. Recipient
✓ Ikura harawanakatta no ka. degree; unit bound
✓ Nan-doru-o harawanakatta no ka. Amount WH + # head as ACC
* Nijū-doru-de harawanakatta no ka. as Incremental Theme of harau — sell Price cloth
A bare negative answer on the canonical NegQ most readily challenges the event or the ACC money. Challenging the Recipient wants that individual already under discussion. That is the opposite of uru, where the money is inside de and is not the default cheap associate.
payBILL contrast (sister root — not this page)
✓ Seikyūsho-o harawanakatta no ka.
✓ Nijū-doru-de seikyūsho-o haratta. instrument / denomination wrapping under BILL
* Seikyūsho-o nijū-doru-o harawanakatta.
Cheap associate is the document. MeasureP as instrument under de is not sell’s Price and not a Double-o. See payBILL.
MeasureP WH diagnostics
WH forces Amount ≠ Denomination inside one Case object of o. Verbal WH sees the MeasureP, not unit and degree as two objects of harau. Watanabe’s #P: Amount in Spec, Denomination as #°, Case as o. Same MeasureP pattern as English payGIVE and as deduct — but here the MeasureP is ACC Theme, not a de-selected Price of sell. Float moves Num+CL, not the counter off the numeral. Double-o survives nai.
- ✓ Nan-doru-o harawanakatta no ka. Amount WH + # head as ACC
- ✓ Ikura harawanakatta no ka. degree; unit bound
- ✓ Dono-tsūka-de / nan-no tsūka-de harawanakatta no ka. in-strategy rescue
- ✓ Nani-o harawanakatta no ka. nani = MeasureP
- * Nani nijū-o harawanakatta no ka. Japanese of *what twenty
- * Nan-o nijū-doru-o harawanakatta. split of #P plus Double-o
- * Doru-o nijū harawanakatta no ka. CL stranded from numeral
Two constraints conspire on the stars: Left Branch / #P integrity (Amount in Spec,#P; Japanese cannot treat bare nijū as the sortal of nani under ACC), and Double-o (goods cannot become a second ACC object of harau). Rescues are nan-doru-o, ikura, and dono-tsūka-de — the Group A spelling of English how many dollars / in what currency. The rescue does not make doru a sister of haratta.
Float is not a second object · optional de on bare U
✓ Nijū-doru-o-wa harawanakatta no ka.
✓ Shibakariki ichi-dai-bun-no daikin-o harawanakatta no ka.
✓ SHIBA-o harau / SHIBA-de harau bare U; de optional when Amount silent/anaphoric
* 3-man SHIBA-de harau as English in-wrap of a complete ⟨n,U⟩ Theme — Theme wants o
✓ 3-man-o SHIBA-de harau Amount ACC + denomination de
de + full MeasureP is fine on uru (Price). The E-crash is not “Japanese bans de+QP.” It is “when n is pronounced, harau’s Incremental Theme wants o.”
Geometry · payGIVE ≠ uru Price ≠ seikyū ≠ payBILL
In Pat-wa Chris-ni nijū-doru-o haratta, Chris comes to HAVE the twenty. That is give-geometry. ni-Recipient is the spell-out of low ApplHAVE — the HAVE diagnostic that SWAP lacks. The Incremental Theme is a MeasureP of funds, not goods.
- ≠ uru / sell. Cloth mismatch under one operator: nijū-doru-o harawanakatta no ka questions ACC money; nijū-doru-de uttanakatta no ka questions a Price INSTR. Shared doru is packaging. The particle gives the heads away: o tracks the money on harau; o tracks the mower on uru.
- ≠ seikyū / chargeFEE. Pat-ni seikyū writes Pat as Source (money FROM). Pat-ni harau writes Pat as Recipient (money TO). Same letter ni; follow-ups flip. Both refuse Double-o.
- ≠ torikaeru / swap. Swap inverts two Themes. harau does not invert money and goods. *8400 USDT-o 0.2 BTC-to torikaenakatta is swap cloth, not pay.
- ≠ payBILL / seikyūsho-o harau. Invoice/obligation as ACC; MeasureP as instrument (de). No silent twenty as DOC object. Crossing the roots smuggles a four-place reading.
- ≠ grant Purpose / earmark / blame for. Pay’s Consideration PP names AGAINST. Grant’s tame-ni is Type B Purpose. Deduct’s Reason and blame’s Charge stay apart.
- Payment-true is e2. A follow-up that Chris never ended up with the twenty denies e2 of payGIVE. Goods-HAVE is sell’s e2, not pay’s. Invoice-clearance is e2 of payBILL.
Ordinary coercion toward trade (Amount as Theme₁, lawnmower as Theme₂) is available and is not the listed payGIVE grid. Wire, remit, and transfer-as-remit sit on this cloth with Source/channel extra.
Shells, ApplP, and Case
Base tree (asymmetric payGIVE · Japanese cloth)
VoiceP [ Pat
vP / initP
ApplP_LOW [ Chrisni [ Appl_HAVE
VP [ √HARAU [ MeasureP / #P [ Amount nijū ] [ #° doru ]o ] ] ] ]
PP_Cons [ de / daikin-to-shite [ Consideration … ] ] ]
Japanese harau never assigns four structural Cases. Amount is o; Recipient is ni; Consideration is inside P. Double-o is the morphological version of the English ceiling *paid Chris the lawnmower twenty dollars: two accusatives from one domain are blocked. A language that appears to have “paid him the mower twenty dollars” has either a second domain (CAUSE / -sase- or high Appl) or a MeasureP that is not a second object.
Amount is Incremental Theme of pay on the give-reading. The lawnmower is Consideration, not Theme. Homomorphism is on ⟨n,U⟩. Passive promotes the MeasureP as a whole, or promotes Recipient under appropriate Voice — never twenty alone without its unit.
Voice filter: weather fails Payer; institutional payers (escrow, payroll, the city) pass. Weaker than Voice_J on blame — systems can pay; they cannot blame.
Type A · Causee vs Recipient
✓ Buchō-wa Pat-ni nijū-doru-o Chris-ni haraw-ase-nakatta no ka.
* Buchō-wa Pat-o nijū-doru-o Chris-ni haraw-ase-nakatta. Double-o under CAUSE
✓ Nani-o dare-ni haraw-ase-nakatta no ka.
Type A -sase- over inner harau allows two ni (Causee ≠ Recipient) and still forbids two o. Money stays the inner o. Consideration stays outside Causee Case. tame-ni Purpose is outside the Case domain.
Omission does not demote MeasureP or Consideration to pure adjuncts when present. The diagnostic is participanthood under Case, binding, and WH — not omitability.
Underivables (Japanese)
- * Pat-ga Chris-ni shibakariki-o nijū-doru-o harawanakatta. Double-o; goods ≠ Theme₄
- * Nani nijū-o harawanakatta no ka. *what twenty
- * Nan-o nijū-doru-o harawanakatta. #P split + Double-o
- * Doru-o nijū harawanakatta no ka. CL stranded from numeral
- * Seikyūsho-o nijū-doru-o harawanakatta. payBILL ≠ payGIVE DOC
- * Buchō-wa Pat-o nijū-doru-o Chris-ni haraw-ase-nakatta. Double-o under CAUSE
- * Nijū-doru-de harawanakatta no ka. as Incremental Theme of harau — sell Price cloth
Group A packaging · this tick Japanese only
Group A (English, Japanese, Mandarin, Navajo) is the contrast set for MeasureP pied-piping with the Incremental Theme flipped from sell’s goods to pay’s money. Same hierarchy; different host of Amount+Denomination and cloth of Recipient. This tick is Japanese payGIVE only. English twin is live at pay-give.html. Mandarin 付 (把 fronts the money QP; 给-Recipient; 为-Consideration) and Navajo money-HANDLE stem switch share the Group A DOCX and remain open/scout — label speculation; do not fake elicitation. Full sense×language pages for Mandarin / Navajo are later queue ticks.
Open items
- Mandarin / Navajo micro-entries. Same Group A geometry; 把 / HANDLE packaging. Deferred — do not invent depth this tick.
- Border nouns (rent / tuition / fine · JA equivalents). One MeasureP with sortal N, or documented coercion to payBILL. Speculative packaging, not a fifth slot.
- Dual-denomination / LP tokens (8400 USDT-o for 0.2 BTC Consideration). Still one MeasureP Theme with pair-name unit when the Theme really is the USDT; inversion is sell/spend of crypto, not payGIVE of USDT.
- Classifier-ride on 付 / harau, elicited against *what twenty / *nani nijū-o. Scout beyond the attested Double-o / nan-doru-o grid.
- chargeFEE · Japanese (seikyū). FROM rather than HAVE-TO needs its own grid; queued separately. Same ni letter as Recipient of harau; follow-ups flip.
- Outer CAUSE (〜させる). Site on the causing vs on HAVE of the Amount; Consideration never becomes Causee Case.
Corpus filenames
Primary extract for this micro-entry is Group A NegQ on pay (Japanese §4). Geometry is shared with the English lexical entry. Disney+ pay companions supply optional-in / bare-U denomination notes under harau. Chat packaging: Tritransitive NegQ Turn Group A (sell/pay flip) and Disney+ SHIBA / PayPal Japanese map. Text extracts used this tick under /tmp/pay-ja-extracts/ and /tmp/pay-extracts/.
- Negative_Questions_Pay_GroupA_Contrast_Set.docx primary · Japanese frames / NegQ / Double-o / #P
- Lexical_Entry_Pay_Argument_Structure.docx shared geometry with English
- Negative_Questions_Pay.docx English-led companion; packaging pointer
- DisneyPlus_Pay_in_Optional_Overt_Amount.docx optional in on bare U · JA map
- DisneyPlus_Pay_the_Price_in_SHIBA_Anaphora.docx silent n = π anaphora · JA map
- Negative_Questions_Sell_GroupA_Contrast_Set.docx uru de Price flip companion
- MeasureP_Japanese_Counters.docx #P / float companion
Series placement: Japanese sense×language twin of English payGIVE. Feeds WH-Raising of Denominations and Pied-Piping MeasureP under Group A cloth with the Incremental Theme flipped from sell’s goods to pay’s money. Does not reopen Type A / Type B causation-chain papers. Does not invent ZH/NV elicitation.
Index 2 citations for this class
Payment citations from Index 2
| Code | Language | Index 2 citation | As printed |
| EN | English | pay, remit, wire, transfer | Vol. 3 |
| ES | Spanish | pagar, transferir, girar | Vol. 5 |
| FR | French | payer, virer, transférer | Vol. 5 |
| IT | Italian | pagare, bonificare, trasferire | Vol. 5 |
| HU | Hungarian | fizet, átutal | Vols. 3, 6 |
| BG | Bulgarian | плащам, превеждам | Vols. 3, 6 |
| PL | Polish | płacić / zapłacić, przelewać / przelać | Vols. 3, 6 |
| DE | German | bezahlen, überweisen | Vol. 7 |
| NL | Dutch | betalen, overmaken | Vol. 7 |
| NO | Norwegian | betale, overføre | Vol. 7 |
Languages Index 2 does not list for this class are left off the table. Japanese is absent from Index 2 Payment — this page is Beyond Index 2. Non-Japanese rows are class citations, not sense×language micro-entries.