pay_GIVE · Hungarian (fizet)

Hierarchy

Same inventory as English pay_GIVE and the Romance twins. Not four-place. Surface count can name Pat, Chris, twenty dollars, and a lawnmower, but the lexicon does not list four co-arguments of √PAY_GIVE / fizet.

húsz dollárt = one MeasureP. Twenty is not dollars. Dollars is not a sister of fizet. Orthography of the accusative -t on dollár is the case of that one object. There is no extra argument “currency symbol.”

What Group C changes is the one preverbal Focus host, and the absence of a particle on this stem. What it does not change is the inventory. On pay_GIVE, Recipient HAS Amount and -ért holds the leftover DP. Payment-true is e2. There is no Hungarian sell page on this site, so goods-HAVE is not given a local Price cloth here. It remains the missing default, as the Romance sell pages already say of pagare / payer / pagar.

MeasureP WH diagnostics

WH forces Amount ≠ Denomination inside one accusative object of fizet. Verbal WH sees the MeasureP, not unit and degree as two objects. No fizet question is printed. The printed measuring WH on this site is the FEE set Mit számolnak fel?, Miben számolnak fel?, Milyen pénznemben?, and the LBC star Mit húsz számolnak fel?, plus FIN Mennyi ETH-t írt jóvá…? and Mennyit írt jóvá…?. The fizet strings below reuse those shapes without fel- or jóvá-, because this stem has no particle to strand. They are constructed. WH is Focus, so the question word is the unique preverbal host. Focus uniqueness of Mit and miben is the star already printed as Mit miben számolnak fel?.

1. ✓ Mit fizetett Pat? constructed · ACC MeasureP · FEE shape Mit számolnak fel?
2. ✓ Mennyi dollárt fizetett? constructed · whole QP · FIN shape Mennyi ETH-t írt jóvá…?
3. ✓ Mennyit fizetett? constructed · degree; unit bound · FIN shape Mennyit írt jóvá…?
4. ✓ Miben fizetett? constructed · U recoding · FEE shape Miben számolnak fel?
5. ✓ Milyen pénznemben fizetett? constructed · same U question · FEE short form Milyen pénznemben?
6. ✓ Kinek fizetett Pat húsz dollárt? constructed · Recipient WH · -nek packaging · no printed kinek + fizet string
7. ✓ Miért fizetett Pat húsz dollárt? constructed · Reason · miért ≠ Amount · letter already used as Charge-WH on blame-hu
8. * Mit húsz fizetett? constructed · LBC / sortal mismatch · same star shape as printed Mit húsz számolnak fel?
9. * Mit miben fizetett? constructed · Focus uniqueness · Mit and miben cannot both be the unique Focus · FEE shape Mit miben számolnak fel?

Left Branch Condition: Amount lives inside MeasureP. The degree does not extract and leave the unit next to the verb. The printed rejection is Mit húsz számolnak fel?. Mit húsz fizetett? is that shape on this stem, tagged constructed. Rescues that keep Amount and unit inside one object are mennyi dollárt, mennyit with the unit bound, and miben / milyen pénznemben. The rescue does not make dollár a sister of fizetett.

Geometry · pay_GIVE ≠ felszámol ≠ pay_BILL ≠ jóváír ≠ levon

In the constructed Pat Chrisnek húsz dollárt fizetett, Chris comes to HAVE the twenty. That is give-geometry. Dative-like Recipient is the preferred spell-out of low Appl_HAVE. The Incremental Theme is a MeasureP of funds, not goods. The HAVE claim is the shared geometry. The Recipient suffix is the open packaging.

Which theta role is the object in this low Appl_HAVE domain is the revisable note Causative templates and argument selection.

• ≠ felszámol / charge_FEE. FROM dual. Mit számolnak fel egy bitcoinért? is a levy: money FROM, e2 = debit / OWE. fizet is money TO, e2 = Recipient HAS Amount. Shared accusative MeasureP family and shared -ért do not make the Appl head one. fel- separates on felszámol. It is not a morpheme of fizet. FEE leaves Payer Case open. This page’s open Case is Recipient, not that Payer.
• ≠ pay_BILL. Invoice/obligation as the object; MeasureP as instrument. English rejects a DOC of twenty dollars and the invoice. This page does not open a Hungarian BILL lemma, and it does not write a számlát and the money as two objects of GIVE. e2 of BILL is invoice-clearance, not Recipient HAS Amount.
• ≠ credit_FIN · jóváír. Ledger increment. The printed cloth is A tanács minden számlának 0,3 ETH-t jóváírt: dative Account, accusative MeasureP. e2 is HAS_ON_BOOKS, not payout and not Recipient HAS the cash. That page already says fizet / átutal are not this root. The shared -nak/-nek letter is Account there and, on the hypothesis here, Recipient. Same case letters are not the same licenser. jóvá- separates under Focus. fizet has no such prefix.
• ≠ deduct · levon. MeasureP leaves a Domain (-ról/-ről). e2 is the decrement. le- separates. Payment stays fizet, átutal in that page’s Index 2 cell. Not HAVE of the Amount.
• ≠ elismer / tulajdonít / hibáztat. MERIT, ATT, and blame. Dative on those pages is Target, not a payment Recipient. Blame’s accusative is the Target, and its -ért is Charge. None of them has a MeasureP of funds. hibáztat also has no prefix, which is the morphological parallel for “no particle,” not a shared root.
• ≠ cserél / swap. Index 2 Transfer cites cserél / kicserél, ad, not fizet. fizet does not invert money and goods.
• Payment-true is e2. A follow-up that Chris never ended up with the twenty denies e2 of pay_GIVE. Goods-HAVE is sell. Invoice-clearance is BILL. Debit/OWE is FEE. HAS_ON_BOOKS is FIN. The decrement is levon.

Ordinary coercion toward trade (Amount as Theme₁, lawnmower as Theme₂) is available and is not the listed grid. átutal is not filled in as that coercion.

Shells, ApplP, and Case

VoiceP  [ Pat
  vP / initP
    ApplP_LOW  [ Chrisnek   [ Appl_HAVE
      VP  [ √PAY- / fizet  [ MeasureP  [ Amount húsz ] [ N dollárt ]ACC ] ] ] ]
    -ért  [ Consideration  egy fűnyíró ] ]

Hungarian fizet does not assign four structural Cases. Amount is accusative. Recipient, on the preferred hypothesis, is dative-like -nak/-nek. Consideration is inside -ért. The English DOC applied-object slot — Recipient as a second accusative — has no twin. There is no particle node. fizetett does not split.

The constituent immediately before the verb is the single Focus host when one is used. Material further left can be a topic. It is not a second Focus. That is the cut blame-hu already writes, and the cut credit-fin-hu stars as Nem 0,3 ETH-t minden számlának írt jóvá a tanács. On jóváír the prefix leaves the stem when Focus or nem takes the slot. On fizet the slot has no particle to displace. The one-host ceiling remains. Because no neutral fizet string is printed, this page does not claim that an immediately preverbal húsz dollárt is Focus-less. A particle verb can look Focus-less with the object preverbal while the prefix fills the verb-modifier slot. fizet has no prefix in that slot.

Amount is Incremental Theme of pay on the give-reading. The lawnmower is Consideration, not Theme. Homomorphism is on ⟨n, U⟩. A passive that promotes the Recipient as a bare nominative applied object would be the English DOC twin. It is not filed. Building that passive on a prefixed verb would invent a stem Index 2 does not cite here. The gap is recorded. No prefixed twin is given a frame.

Voice filter: weather fails Payer. Institutional payers (the city, payroll, escrow) pass on the English and Romance pages. The Hungarian weather star below is that filter in the clothes already used for A rossz időjárás felszámol and A rossz időjárás minden számlának 0,3 ETH-t jóváírt. Constructed. Weaker than Voice on blame — a city can pay; it cannot blame.

Omission does not demote the MeasureP or Consideration to pure adjuncts when present. The diagnostic is participanthood under Case, binding, and WH — not omitability.

N/A · not Hungarian pay_GIVE diagnostics

Sibling pages omit diagnostics the language does not have. Hungarian fizet is accusative MeasureP, preferred dative-like Recipient, ranked -ért Consideration, and one preverbal Focus host, with no particle on the stem. It is not a copy of Romance clitics, a Germanic separable prefix, or genitive of negation.

• A fel- or le- separation of fizet. N/A. fizet is not that stem. fel- belongs to felszámol. le- belongs to levon. No separation string is filed for fizet.
• A filled frame for átutal, or át- as a particle of this root. N/A. át- is the companion’s morphology. The companion stays an Index 2 stem without a GIVE Case frame.
• An English DOC or to-frame as a second Hungarian frame. N/A. Recipient is not a second bare accusative. The English alternation stays on pay-give.html.
• Romance clitic doubling. N/A. le + a, and Italian gli beside a in separate strings, stay on the Romance pages. Hungarian has no such clitic pair to file.
• Spanish por / para or Italian per as Hungarian letters. N/A. The live for-letter here is -ért. Purpose vs Consideration is a complement-type question on that one letter, flagged open where Purpose would stack.
• Genitive of negation rewriting the MeasureP. N/A as a Hungarian rule. nem does not rewrite húsz dollárt. The Polish rewrite is on pay-give-pl.html and the Polish measuring pages. The starred húsz dollárnak under nem is only the prohibition. -nak on that star is not the Recipient suffix.
• Japanese Double-o, Mandarin 把 / 给 / 为. N/A. Those clothes stay on pay-give-ja.html and pay-give-zh.html.
• Navajo money-HANDLE as a Hungarian stem. N/A. Sell · Navajo stays deferred.

Group C packaging · this tick Hungarian only

Group C is the Inner European set already used for Hungarian Focus + nem. Same √PAY_GIVE hierarchy as English, Japanese, Mandarin, and Romance. The cloth difference is the one preverbal host, not a new argument. This tick is Hungarian fizet only. English is live at pay-give.html. Japanese harau is live at pay-give-ja.html. Mandarin 付 is live at pay-give-zh.html. Spanish pagar is live at pay-give-es.html. French payer is live at pay-give-fr.html. Italian pagare is live at pay-give-it.html and closed Romance. Polish płacić / zapłacić is live; przelewać / przelać stay unfilled. Bulgarian плащам is live; превеждам stays unfilled. The next Index 2 Payment citation is a pause, or Group D German bezahlen, überweisen, or an unfilled companion. German is not opened here. Navajo money-HANDLE remains open/scout. Do not fake elicitation.

Open items

• Recipient Case. Preferred letter -nak/-nek, from live Account and Target, and from the Group C note that Recipient competes with Amount for Focus. No printed fizet string shows the suffix. Kinek fizetett…? is constructed, not elicited. The letter stays open as a field judgment. spec
• Polish płacić is live. Bulgarian плащам is live. The suggested following candidate is a pause, or Group D German bezahlen, or an unfilled companion. Another language of pay_GIVE would not increment VERB_COUNT. A pause is equally in order. spec
• átutal. Named. No filled GIVE frame, no second root, no át- separation copied onto fizet. spec
• Purpose stacked on Consideration. -ért + DP is the ranked Consideration, guided by FEE egy bitcoinért. A Purpose stack (Index 2’s outer Purpose) is not checked as good or bad. spec
• Hungarian pay_BILL. Not merged. No document + money double object is promoted to a second sense page.
• Definite conjugation in a printed string. fizette beside az összeget is the live definiteness cut, constructed here. It is not a quotation.
• Navajo sell, and unwritten merit pages. sell · Navajo stays deferred. No credit-merit-bg.html. No credit-merit-pl.html.

Corpus filenames

Primary geometry is the English pay lexical entry, including the Group C sentence “Hungarian fizet: Focus on Amount vs Recipient.” Hungarian clothes for MeasureP, -ért, Focus uniqueness, and the weather filter are the strings already printed on the FEE, FIN, deduct, and blame micro-entries. No fizet clause is among them. Constructed Pat/Chris frames diagnose packaging. They are not new elicitation. Index 2 Payment remains fizet, átutal.