charge_FEE · felszámol

Hierarchy

Same inventory as English charge_FEE. Not four-place. Surface count can name the shop, a payer, twenty dollars, and a meal. The lexicon does not list four co-arguments of √CHARGE_FEE / √FELSZÁMOL-.

Twenty dollars is one MeasureP. Amount and Denomination are inner arguments of that object. Composition is V(MeasureP), not V(n)(U). Bare Mit answers the whole QP or a fee-type first. Denomination alone is the marked reading.

Geometry is 1+2 with optional outer Consideration: one Initiator, one applied Source, one measuring object. That is the FROM dual of fizet’s payment. It is not English DOC copied as two accusative Themes, not bet’s 1+3, and not sell’s Price-as-MeasureP.

Working hierarchy: Chargor_NOM > Payer/Source_{Case open} > MeasureP ⟨n,U⟩_ACC (> Consideration -ért).

Hungarian frames · particle, accusative MeasureP, Payer open

felszámol is one lemma. fel- looks like a separable fel + számol. It is verbal-particle morphology: it occupies the verb-modifier slot when that slot is empty, and it follows the verb when Focus or nem takes the slot. Separation is Move of the particle. It is not a second predicate and not a new argument. The printed questions already show the separated order, because WH is Focus: számolnak fel, not felszámolnak. számolnak is indefinite 3pl, matching indefinite Mit. A definite fee would take definite conjugation. That alternation is object definiteness, the same cut already used on the live Hungarian pages. The definite fee string is not printed here and is not ranked.

No English double object of Payer + MeasureP as two bare accusative Themes. No genitive of negation — that rewrite belongs to Polish obciążyć. megvádol is the ACCUSE pair on the same plate and a different root (meg- + vádol). Do not merge the particles.

1. ✓ Mit számolnak fel? printed · bare WHAT · QP or fee-type first · U marked · fel separates
2. ✓ Miben számolnak fel? printed · U recoding
3. ✓ Milyen pénznemben? printed short form · same U question
4. ✓ Mit számolnak fel egy bitcoinért? printed · -ért = Consideration, not U of the fee
5. ✓ Miben számolnak fel egy bitcoinért? printed isolation · U_fee beside -ért
6. ✓ Nem számolnak fel? verbal nem · one host · fel follows · constructed from the particle note · no Payer filled
7. * Mit húsz számolnak fel? printed LBC · Amount stranded beside the unit
8. * Mit miben számolnak fel? Focus uniqueness · Mit and miben cannot both be the unique Focus
9. * Payer-ACC + MeasureP-ACC as two bare Themes. no English DOC copied · packaging prohibition · no Case-filled string filed
10. * A rossz időjárás felszámol. Voice filter · weather fails Chargor · constructed · Payer unfilled
11. ✓ A parkolóóra felszámol. institutional Initiator · constructed · prefix on the stem · no Focus · Payer unfilled

MeasureP WH · denomination diagnostics

WH forces Amount ≠ Denomination inside one accusative MeasureP. Verbal WH sees that object. It does not see unit and degree as two objects of felszámol. WH is Focus, so fel follows the verb. Same MeasureP pattern as English charge_FEE: the MeasureP is the fee, not a Price inside Consideration.

1. ✓ Mit számolnak fel? printed bare WHAT
2. ✓ Miben számolnak fel? printed · miben recodes U
3. ✓ Milyen pénznemben? printed · currency question
4. ✓ Mit számolnak fel egy bitcoinért? -ért holds Consideration; it does not answer U
5. ✓ Miben számolnak fel egy bitcoinért? U_fee isolated beside Consideration
6. * Mit húsz számolnak fel? LBC · sortal mismatch on a stranded numeral
7. * Mit miben számolnak fel? two unique Focus hosts

Two constraints sit on the stars. Left Branch Condition: Amount lives inside MeasureP; the degree does not extract and leave the unit next to the verb (Mit húsz). Focus uniqueness: Hungarian has one preverbal Focus. Mit and miben cannot both be that host. Rescues are the printed miben / milyen pénznemben questions — the Group C spelling of English in what.

There is no genitive of negation on this QP. nem does not rewrite Mit into a genitive. Polish obciążyć is the Group C host of that rewrite. It is not this page.

Focus + nem · one host · fel separates

Hungarian has one preverbal Focus position. On felszámol the verb modifier in that slot is the particle fel-. When the slot is empty of Focus and of nem, the particle stays on the stem. When a constituent is the unique Focus, or when nem takes the slot, the particle follows the verb. The particle cannot share the slot. The Group C note calls this “Focus reads height”: MeasureP and Payer are both candidates for that one host, and they cannot occupy it together.

1. ✓ Mit számolnak fel? printed · Mit is the unique Focus · particle off the stem
2. ✓ Miben számolnak fel? printed · miben is the unique Focus · particle off the stem
3. ✓ Nem számolnak fel? verbal nem · no second Focus · particle off · constructed · arguments unfilled
4. ✓ A parkolóóra felszámol. no preverbal Focus · particle stays · constructed
5. * Mit miben számolnak fel? two Focus hosts
6. * Mit felszámolnak? Focus already fills the slot · particle cannot stay on the stem · constructed from the particle note
7. * Nem felszámolnak? nem takes the slot · particle cannot stay · constructed from the particle note

A filled MeasureP under Focus+nem (the order live jóváír prints as Nem 0,3 ETH-t írtak jóvá…) is the same one-slot grammar. The FEE plate does not print that filled string. It stays unranked. Whether nem sits after a WH Focus (Mit nem számolnak fel?) is likewise unprinted. Open. Height still blocks a Payer phrase and a MeasureP phrase from being unique Focus together. Because Payer Case is open, this page does not star a kinek + mit string as if dative had been chosen.

Geometry · charge_FEE beside the live Hungarian roots

In the FEE geometry the Payer is the person the money comes FROM. In fizet the Recipient is the person the money goes TO. e2 of charge_FEE is debit / OWE of ⟨n,U⟩ on the Payer. A later payment does not have to be true for the levy to be true.

• fizet / pay_GIVE. Index 2 Payment. Shared MeasureP family, opposite direction. Payment-true is that later event, not e2 of felszámol.
• sell. Price is the MeasureP of a HAVE-goods root. -ért on this page is Consideration of the debit. It is not that Price. No Hungarian sell micro-entry is opened here. sell·Navajo stays deferred.
• deduct. Shared FROM + MeasureP. English deduct keeps Domain as a from-PP. English charge_FEE can promote the Payer. Hungarian does not copy that promotion as two accusative Themes. The Payer’s Case letter stays open.
• megvádol / charge_ACCUSE. Ascription: Judge > Target > Accusation. Different root on the same Group C plate. No selected MeasureP. No Appl_FROM of money. See charge-accuse.html.
• charge_ACCOUNT. To-card Destination is book-entry. This plate does not give it a Hungarian lemma. The FEE page keeps Appl_FROM and the accusative MeasureP.
• jóváír / credit_FIN. Live at credit-fin-hu.html. TO ledger increment: dative Account + accusative MeasureP, prefix jóvá-. Opposite polarity from FROM. The shared Focus slot and the shared accusative measure do not make the roots one lemma.
• elismer / credit_MERIT. Live at credit-merit-hu.html. Merit ascription. No MeasureP. Prefix el-, not fel-.
• tulajdonít / attribute_ATT. Live at attribute-att-hu.html. Content ascription. No MeasureP.
• hibáztat / okol. Live at blame-hu.html. Accusative is the Target. -ért there is Charge content. -ért here is Consideration of a fee. Same case letter, different licenser. No prefix on the blame lemmas.
• -ért and miatt. egy bitcoinért is Consideration (printed). miatt is Reason. The split is the packaging note. A ranked miatt example is not printed. Consideration is not sell’s Price MeasureP, and it is not blame’s Charge.
• Debit-true is e2. Goods-HAVE is sell’s e2. HAS_ON_BOOKS is jóváír’s e2. Guilt is megvádol’s business. None of those is e2 of felszámol.

Shells, ApplP, and Case

VoiceP  [ Chargor
  (ReasonP  [ miatt … ])
  ApplP_FROM  [ PayerCase open   [ Appl_FROM
    VP  [ fel- √SZÁMOL-   [ MeasurePACC  [ Amount ] [ N U ] ] ] ] ]
  PP_ért  [ -ért  [ Consideration ] ] ]

Voice introduces Chargor. Appl_FROM introduces Payer. MeasureP sits as Incremental Theme of the debit (accusative). Consideration attaches as -ért. Reason attaches as miatt. There is no Recipient HAVE shell and no English double object of two accusative Themes. Putting either in is how a four-place accident gets written.

Proto-roles are shell-local. Chargor is a partial Proto-Agent (institution, script, meter). Payer is Proto-Source, not Proto-Recipient. MeasureP is Incremental Theme of the debit. Denomination is not a further theta role.

∃e [ CHARGE(e)
  ∧ INIT(e, chargor)
  ∧ FROM(e, payer)
  ∧ TH(e, ⟨n, U⟩)
  ∧ CONSID(e, consideration) ]

Underivables (Hungarian)

1. * Mit húsz számolnak fel? printed LBC
2. * Mit miben számolnak fel? printed Focus uniqueness
3. * Mit felszámolnak? particle stays under Focus · constructed from the particle note
4. * Nem felszámolnak? particle stays under nem · constructed from the particle note
5. * Two bare accusative Themes (Payer + MeasureP). English DOC not copied · no filled string filed
6. * Genitive of negation on the measuring QP. Polish obciążyć, not Hungarian
7. * MeasureP and Payer both unique Focus. Focus reads height · Case of the Payer still open
8. * A rossz időjárás felszámol. Voice filter · constructed
9. * Fee MeasureP on megvádol, or an accusation on felszámol. different roots

Group C packaging · Hungarian FEE only

Group C (Hungarian, Bulgarian, Polish) is the Inner European Focus / cluster / GEN-neg contrast set already named on charge_FEE · English. Same hierarchy as the English levy. Hungarian hosts the fee as an accusative MeasureP, with one preverbal Focus, separation of fel-, and -ért Consideration. Bulgarian таксувам is the plate’s WH-cluster name (clusters do not split Amount from unit); обвинявам is its ACCUSE pair. Polish obciążyć / naliczyć is the plate’s GEN-neg name (the genitive hits the measure QP or a promoted Payer, not a stranded unit); oskarżyć stays the ACCUSE pair. This page is Hungarian felszámol only. Bulgarian is live at charge-fee-bg.html. Polish is live at charge-fee-pl.html and closes Group C FEE. This page does not open Group D (berechnen / belasten, in rekening brengen, belaste / ta betalt). megvádol stays the ACCUSE pair, unmerged.

Open items

• Payer Case. Dative-like -nak/-nek versus accusative promotion. The Group C note prints height, not the Case letter. Both spellings stay open. No field judgment either way.
• Filled Focus+nem on a MeasureP. The particle note and the printed WH set diagnose separation. A string with a filled amount under nem, and the order Mit nem számolnak fel?, are not on the FEE plate.
• miatt Reason. The letter is the Reason half of the -ért / miatt split. No printed example is ranked against egy bitcoinért.
• Definite conjugation. Printed számolnak is indefinite, with indefinite Mit. The definite pair is the usual Hungarian object-definiteness alternation. It is not a second argument and not a printed FEE string.
• Bulgarian таксувам. Live at charge-fee-bg.html. обвинявам stays the ACCUSE pair.
• Polish obciążyć / naliczyć. Live at charge-fee-pl.html. Closes Group C FEE. oskarżyć stays the ACCUSE pair.
• Group D FEE. German berechnen / belasten is live. Dutch and Norwegian stay deferred. sell·Navajo stays deferred. No credit-merit-bg.html and no credit-merit-pl.html.

Corpus filenames

Primary extracts are the Group C plate of the charge lexical entry (felszámol / megvádol; Focus reads height; particle separation under Focus and nem) and the Group C block of the denomination note (bare Mit számolnak fel?, Miben / Milyen pénznemben, egy bitcoinért, rejected Mit húsz, Focus uniqueness of Mit and miben). Geometry is shared with the English FEE micro-entry. The one-host Focus plate is the Group C shell note already cited for the live Hungarian attitude and ledger pages. DOCX originals under the Tritransitive lit tree. Constructed HU frames diagnose packaging. They are not new elicitation. Index 2 Payment remains fizet, átutal.