charge_FEE · berechnen / belasten

Hierarchy

Same inventory as English charge_FEE and the live Group C twins. Not four-place. Surface count can name the workshop, Pat, twenty, euros, and a meal. The lexicon does not list four co-arguments of √CHARGE_FEE. Group D does not add a fourth argument. It adds V2 and R-pronouns, and it disagrees, inside German, on which dependent wears structural accusative.

The fee is one MeasureP. Amount and Denomination are inner arguments of that object. Composition is V(MeasureP), not V(n)(U). A bare Was answers the whole QP or a fee-type first. Denomination alone is the marked reading, reached by a currency menu (in welcher Währung / worin). It is not the first answer out of the blue.

Geometry is 1+2 with optional outer Consideration: one Initiator, one applied Source, one measuring object. Shared dative with zahlen is not Appl_HAVE. V2 is a T-copy. An R-pronoun resumes für, mit, auf, or in. It does not resume Euro minus zwanzig.

Working hierarchy: Chargor > Payer/Source > MeasureP ⟨n,U⟩ (> für-Consideration). Cloth A Case: Payer DAT, MeasureP ACC. Cloth B Case: Payer or card ACC, Amount in mit.

German frames · two FEE cloths

berechnen and belasten are the two FEE names the Group D notes print. They are not an aspect pair and not a HAVE/FROM pair. in Rechnung stellen may appear as companion phrasing of cloth A (the same dative Payer and accusative MeasureP). The notes do not print a filled in Rechnung stellen string, so this page does not invent one. anklagen and live beschuldigen are the ACCUSE pair, different roots. Do not merge them with the levy.

1. ✓ Die Werkstatt hat Pat zwanzig Euro für das Essen berechnet. NegQ Group D (1) · constructed · DAT Pat · ACC MeasureP · für Consideration
2. ✓ Hat die Werkstatt Pat nicht zwanzig Euro berechnet? NegQ (2) · constructed · cheap associate = the money
3. ✓ Hat die Werkstatt Pat nicht zwanzig Euro für das Essen berechnet? NegQ (3) · constructed · Consideration stays für
4. ✓ Wie viel Euro hat sie ihm nicht berechnet? NegQ (28) · constructed · ACC MeasureP · DAT ihm · no P on the QP
5. ✓ Wie viel hat SoFi vor zwei Minuten für ein Bitcoin berechnet? how-much note · constructed PF · V2 hat · silent DAT · wie viel in Spec,CP
6. ✓ Hat RBS Chase Bank vor zwei Minuten fünfzigtausend (in) Yen oder Dollar für ein Bitcoin berechnet? RBS–Chase note · constructed · Chase stays DAT · units stay in Coord · no unit trace
7. ✓ Hat der Parkautomat Pat nicht zwanzig Euro berechnet? NegQ (95) · constructed · institutional Initiator
8. * Hat das Wetter Pat nicht zwanzig Euro berechnet? NegQ (92) · constructed · weather fails Chargor

1. ✓ Hat man Pat nicht mit zwanzig Euro belastet? NegQ (4) / (23) · constructed · ACC Payer · Amount in mit
2. ✓ Hat man die Karte nicht mit zwanzig Euro belastet? NegQ (24) · constructed · card ACC · ACCOUNT-adjacent host of the same cloth
3. ✓ Womit / Mit wie viel hat SoFi vor zwei Minuten für ein Bitcoin belastet? how-much note · constructed · Amount-WH is the mit-PP, not accusative wie viel
4. ✓ Hat RBS Chase Bank vor zwei Minuten mit fünfzigtausend (in) Yen oder Dollar für ein Bitcoin belastet? RBS–Chase note · constructed · Chase ACC · womit would resume mit, not Yen minus tausend
5. ✓ Hat man das Essen nicht auf Pats Karte gebucht / belastet? NegQ (70) · constructed · destination auf · charge_ACCOUNT neighbour · not a second FEE root

MeasureP WH / NegQ · denomination, R-pronouns, LBC

WH forces Amount ≠ Denomination inside one MeasureP. Verbal WH sees that object on cloth A. On cloth B the Amount is already inside mit, so the Amount question is womit / mit wie viel. R-pronouns follow the cloth. They follow the leftover P, not a fixed theta name. nicht does not rewrite the QP into a genitive. That rewrite is Polish, live at charge-fee-pl.html. There is no unique preverbal Focus host, so these questions are not Hungarian particle-separation.

1. ✓ Was berechnen Sie? denomination note (41) · Group D row · QP or fee-type first · U marked
2. ✓ Womit belasten Sie? denomination note (42) · cloth B · Amount as mit-PP · can be answered as a QP or, more readily, as U
3. ✓ In welcher Währung / worin berechnen Sie? denomination note (43) · currency menu · λU · worin resumes in, not a unit minus n
4. ✓ Was berechnen Sie für ein Bitcoin? denomination note (44) · dual · QP of the fee first · Consideration stays für
5. ✓ Wofür hat die Werkstatt Pat nicht zwanzig Euro berechnet? NegQ (27) · constructed · wofür = Consideration · not the unit
6. ✓ Womit hat man Pat nicht belastet? NegQ (31) · constructed · womit = the mit-Amount
7. ✓ Worauf hat man das Essen nicht belastet? NegQ (72) · constructed · worauf = the card · destination P
8. ✓ In welcher Währung hat sie ihm nicht zwanzig berechnet? NegQ (33) / (54) · constructed · unit recoded as a PP
9. * Was zwanzig berechnen Sie? denomination note (51) · LBC · underivable
10. * Was zwanzig hat sie ihm nicht berechnet? NegQ (50) · constructed · same LBC under nicht
11. * Für was zwanzig hat sie ihm nicht berechnet? NegQ (29) · constructed · unit cannot ride out of Consideration für
12. * Wie viel hat sie ihm nicht Euro berechnet? NegQ (53) · constructed · degree out, unit stranded next to V
13. * Wo hat sie ihm nicht für zwanzig berechnet? NegQ (30) · constructed · wofür does not decompose onto a unit remnant

The how-much derivation writes cloth A as [CP wie-viel₂ [C' hat_T [TP SoFi₁ [T' t_T [VoiceP t₁ [VP [MeasureP t₂ U] [für ein Bitcoin] berechnet]]]]]]. Chains are {SoFi₁, t₁} INIT, {hat_T, t_T} V2 / PAST, {wie viel₂, t₂} ACC Amount. Cloth B copies the mit-PP: [CP womit₂ [C' hat_T [TP SoFi₁ [T' t_T [VoiceP t₁ [VP [DP x] [PP t₂] belastet]]]]]]. wo- resumes mit. These brackets are the derivation note’s traces. They are not an interview.

Superiority in the NegQ note ranks Chargor and the accusative object above Consideration. It does not rank Amount against Denomination as two verbal WH targets. Multiple WH Wer hat wem wie viel wofür berechnet? is printed there as preferring Agent-initial. It is a constructed packaging line, not an elicited superiority paradigm, and it is not Hungarian Focus uniqueness.

Geometry · charge_FEE beside the live German roots

In the FEE geometry the Payer is the person the money comes FROM. e2 is debit / OWE of ⟨n,U⟩ on that Payer. A later payment does not have to be true for the levy to be true. Shared dative letters with pay do not flip FROM into HAVE.

• zahlen / bezahlen / überweisen / pay_GIVE. Index 2 Payment cites bezahlen, überweisen. The NegQ contrast uses Hat man Pat nicht zwanzig Euro gezahlt? beside Hat man Pat nicht zwanzig Euro berechnet? Same DAT + ACC letters. The constructed follow-ups flip: er hat die zwanzig nie bekommen is HAVE, good on the pay line; sie gingen vom Konto is FROM, good on the charge line. Payment-true is that later event, not e2 of berechnen.
• verkaufen. Constructed contrast: Hat die Werkstatt Pat das Essen nicht für zwanzig Euro verkauft? puts twenty inside für and the goods in the accusative. On berechnen, twenty is accusative and für hosts the goods as Consideration. Shared wofür is Price of sell and Consideration of charge. It does not give one shell. No German sell micro-entry is opened here. sell·Navajo stays deferred.
• um zu. Purpose is Type B. Constructed: Hat man Pat nicht zwanzig Euro berechnet, um die Rechnung zu begleichen? is good as Purpose. Wofür does not replace um zu. Wozu is why, not Consideration WH.
• deduct. Shared FROM + MeasureP. English deduct keeps Domain as a from-PP. German von on a source account is that Domain cloth when the notes use abgezogen. It is a wrapping, not evidence that the accusative Payer of belasten was secretly a PP. No German deduct page this tick.
• anklagen / charge_ACCUSE. Judge > Target > Accusation. Target accusative. Content in the genitive or under wegen. No selected MeasureP. wegen ≠ für. Constructed crash: *Hat man Pat nicht zwanzig Euro des Betrugs berechnet? See charge-accuse.html.
• beschuldigen. Live at blame-de.html. Index 2 Attitude. Accusative is the Target. Charge wears the genitive, wegen, or dass. On that page wofür resumes Charge content. On this page wofür resumes FEE Consideration. Same pronoun, different licenser. Guilt-true is that root’s business, not e2 of the levy.
• charge_ACCOUNT. auf die Karte is a Goal of book-entry. worauf resumes that destination. Cheap inner associate is the accusative item or the accusative card. Nein — Pat hat das Essen nie bekommen is not e2 of ACCOUNT. Keep the sister on charge-account.html.
• gutschreiben / credit_FIN. Live at credit-fin-de.html. TO ledger increment: accusative MeasureP, dative Account or auf+accusative Account. Opposite polarity from FROM. HAS_ON_BOOKS is that page’s e2. The shared measuring object does not make the roots one lemma. auf there is Account. auf here, on the card, is the ACCOUNT destination the NegQ note resumes with worauf.
• zuschreiben / credit_MERIT and attribute_ATT. Live at credit-merit-de.html and attribute-att-de.html. Content ascription: dative Target + accusative Charge. No MeasureP. No Appl_FROM of money. A dative on those pages is the ascribee. A dative on berechnen is the Payer.
• Hungarian Focus and Polish GEN-neg. Live felszámol separates fel- under one preverbal host. Live obciążyć / naliczyć rewrites the measuring QP under nie. German nicht leaves the accusative MeasureP accusative on cloth A and leaves the mit-PP intact on cloth B. Do not import the particle. Do not import the genitive rewrite.
• lassen. Outer CAUSE is two Voice domains. Constructed: Hat der Dekan die Werkstatt Pat nicht zwanzig Euro berechnen lassen? Causee can be accusative. MeasureP stays accusative on cloth A. Payer stays dative. Consideration stays für and does not become a third accusative. That is not a fourth argument of √CHARGE_FEE.
• High dative. Constructed: Hat man mir Pat nicht zwanzig Euro berechnet? An extra dative can be a high Affectee. It is not a second Payer and not a Recipient of HAVE. für mich stays Beneficiary.
• Debit-true is e2. Goods-HAVE is sell’s e2. HAS_ON_BOOKS is gutschreiben’s e2. Guilt is anklagen’s and beschuldigen’s business. Payment-true is bezahlen / überweisen. None of those is e2 of berechnen or belasten.

Passives, in the passives cut, are a Voice test and not a new argument. The cut’s map: on belasten the former accusative Payer can promote and the Amount stays a mit-PP; on berechnen the former accusative MeasureP can promote and the Payer stays dative. Consideration does not promote. No filled German passive paradigm is printed in that cut, so none is filed here. The map is a packaging prediction, not an elicited werden-paradigm.

Shells, ApplP, and Case

1. M1√CHARGE_FEE merges with MeasureP ⟨Amount, Denom⟩
2. M2Appl_FROM merges Payer · DAT on cloth A · ACC on cloth B
3. M3Voice merges Chargor
4. A4Cloth A: v ↔ MeasureP ACC · Cloth B: v ↔ Payer/card ACC, Amount in mit
5. V5V2 · {hat_T, t_T} · not a theta chain
6. V6WH or R-pronoun fronts · unit stays inside MeasureP
7. F7Voice filter · weather ≠ Chargor
8. G8Gold · debit / OWE ≠ bezahlen · LBC holds · no fourth argument

[CP hat_T [TP RBS_1 [T' t_T [VoiceP t_1
  [ApplP Chase_4
    [VP [MP fünfzigtausend [in [Yen oder Dollar]]]
        [für ein Bitcoin] berechnet]]]]]]
{RBS_1, t_1} INIT · {hat_T, t_T} V2 · Chase stays DAT · units stay in Coord

[CP hat_T [TP RBS_1 [T' t_T [VoiceP t_1
  [VP [DP Chase_4]
      [PP mit fünfzigtausend (in) Yen oder Dollar]
      [für ein Bitcoin] belastet]]]]]
Chase is ACC · womit would resume mit, not Yen minus tausend

λn ∃e ∃x ∃U [ CHARGE(e) ∧ INIT(e, SoFi) ∧ FROM(e, x)
  ∧ TH(e, ⟨n, U⟩) ∧ CONSID(e, z_BTC)
  ∧ τ(e) ⊆ [t* − 2 min, t*) ]

Voice introduces Chargor. Appl_FROM introduces Payer. MeasureP sits as Incremental Theme of the debit. Consideration attaches under für. There is no Recipient HAVE shell, no Hungarian verb-modifier slot, and no English double object of two bare Themes on cloth A. Cloth B’s accusative Payer is still Source. Putting HAVE, a stranded unit, or a third accusative Consideration into either cloth is how a four-place accident gets written.

Proto-roles are shell-local. Chargor is a partial Proto-Agent (workshop, bank, meter, script). Payer is Proto-Source, not Proto-Recipient. MeasureP is Incremental Theme of the debit. Denomination is not a further theta role. An R-pronoun is not a theta role.

Underivables (German)

1. * Was zwanzig berechnen Sie? LBC · denomination note · underivable
2. * Für was zwanzig hat sie ihm nicht berechnet? unit out of Consideration für · constructed
3. * Wie viel hat sie ihm nicht Euro berechnet? unit stranded next to V · constructed
4. * Wo hat sie ihm nicht für zwanzig berechnet? wofür does not split onto Euro minus zwanzig · constructed
5. * Hat das Wetter Pat nicht zwanzig Euro berechnet? Voice filter · constructed
6. * Hat man Pat nicht zwanzig Euro des Betrugs berechnet? FEE + ACCUSE stacked · für ≠ des / wegen · constructed
7. * Hat man Pat nicht Betrug berechnet? NegQ (82) · constructed · accusation on the levy verb
8. * A genitive rewrite of the QP under nicht. that host is Polish obciążyć / naliczyć · no German genitive string is printed, so none is starred as if elicited
9. * A unique Focus host, or a separable particle under nicht. Hungarian felszámol · not this page
10. * First-out-of-the-blue U as the default of bare Was. denomination note · marked U · currency menu is the direct question
11. * Consideration promoted, or für turned into a third accusative under lassen. passives cut · NegQ (103) · two Voice domains · Consideration stays für
12. * Payment entailed by the levy. e2 is debit / OWE · bezahlen / überweisen are later
13. * Ledger gutschreiben, or ATT/MERIT zuschreiben, as this MeasureP. live on their own pages

Group D packaging · German FEE opens the set

Group D (German, Dutch, Norwegian) is the V2 / R-pronoun set already named on charge_FEE · English. Same hierarchy as the English levy. Group C is closed: Hungarian felszámol (Focus and fel-), Bulgarian таксувам (WH clusters; за Consideration), Polish obciążyć / naliczyć (genitive of negation on the measuring QP). This page is German FEE only, and it opens Group D FEE. Dutch in rekening brengen is live and continues the set. Norwegian belaste is live and closes the set (med-Amount; ta betalt named and unfilled; siktet stays ACCUSE). anklagen stays on charge_ACCUSE. Live beschuldigen stays on blame-de.html.

Against Group B, cloth A is the same dative-Payer, accusative-MeasureP pattern Romance already writes. Group D adds cloth B and replaces en/ne with R-pronouns. What sits in C is V2 hat, not a Romance finite-verb copy. worin extracts in. It does not extract the denomination. belasten is the same FROM root as berechnen, with a different Case exponent — the comparison note’s split, Polish cloth B spelled as a mit-PP.

Open items

• Markedness of the two cloths. The NegQ note says constructed examples do not replace elicitation on belasten plus an accusative person versus dative plus berechnen. Both cloths are filed as packaging. Their relative markedness is not ranked.
• in Rechnung stellen. Companion phrasing of cloth A. No filled string is printed in the German notes used here, so none is adopted.
• worauf versus auf was. The same note leaves that markedness unelicited. worauf is the resumer the notes use for the card.
• Multi-accusative order under lassen. Two Voice domains are adopted. The internal order of Causee and MeasureP is not given an elicited ranking. Consideration still does not join that cluster.
• German passive paradigm. The passives cut predicts which dependent promotes on each cloth. It does not print a werden-paradigm. None is invented here.
• Dutch and Norwegian FEE. Dutch in rekening brengen is live. Norwegian belaste is live and closes Group D. Not reopened here.
• sell·Navajo stays deferred. No credit-merit-bg.html and no credit-merit-pl.html.

Corpus filenames

Primary extracts are the Group D charge notes: negative questions (two cloths, R-pronouns, anklagen versus berechnen), the SoFi how-much derivation (V2 traces), the RBS–Chase derivation (units in Coord, no unit copy), the Group B versus Group D comparison, and the denomination note’s German rows (Was berechnen Sie? through *Was zwanzig berechnen Sie?). The lexical entry’s Group D paragraph names berechnen / in Rechnung stellen / belasten against anklagen / beschuldigen. DOCX originals under the Tritransitive lit tree. Index 2 Payment remains bezahlen, überweisen. Nothing on this page is presented as field elicitation.