Working paper. Italian micro-entry closing the Group B Romance MERIT set (ES → FR → IT). Geometry from Lexical_Entry_Credit_Argument_Structure and NegQ association maps from Negative_Questions_Credit (Romance morphology split attribuire/attribuer/atribuir ascribe vs accreditare/créditer/acreditar-ledger; Italian ne resumes measured quantity on the Abney spine, parallel to French en). Constructed diagnostics diagnose Case clothes (a / di / per), light-noun merito, Voice filter, and the MERIT / FIN root split; they are not spontaneous-speech citations. English, Spanish, French, and Japanese twins already live.
Constructed examples. Frames below are packaging hypotheses aligned with the lexical entry, chat 23 / 25 Romance split notes, and the Italian blame twin (incolpare … di). Cause-true and settlement are not entailed — same missing defaults as English creditMERIT, attributeATT, and blame. Do not fake elicitation. FIN strings appear only as contrast pointers.
Sense-class · FIN/MERIT split (cleaner than Spanish). Index 2 lists Italian Attitude as incolpare, attribuire (Vols. 3, 5). This page deepens the merit / ascribe-positive reading as √ASCRIBE (+). Romance usually splits morphology more cleanly than English or Spanish: attribuire / light-noun merito host MERIT; accreditare hosts FIN / ledger (live at creditFIN · Italian). Flag any surface overlap; do not deepen FIN here. MERIT has no MeasureP and no Account.
Scout / deferred. Relative productivity of bare attribuire vs light-noun riconoscere / attribuire il merito is scout-leaning where the extract lists forms without ranking them. Mandarin / Navajo merit packaging and Group C / D predictions stay deferred. No fake elicitation.

Hierarchy

Same inventory as English creditMERIT, Spanish acreditar, French attribuer, and Japanese 功績を認める. Not five-place. Not four sisters of one V. Surface count can name the investors, the early completion, and the contractor — but the lexicon does not list four co-arguments of √ASCRIBE / √ATTRIBU-.

Intended labeling (shared with English)

√ASCRIBE (positive / meritorious) + VoiceJ(Judge) + Charge + Target  ·  hierarchy Cognizer / Judge > Charge / Content > Target

Voice introduces Judge (proto-Agent of the attitude). The ascription relates Target to Charge under positive / meritorious HOLD. Italian spells productive clothes as Charge ACC + a-Target (attribuire Charge a Target), Target ACC + di/per-Charge companions where natural, and light-noun on-geometry (riconoscere / attribuire il merito a Target). Optional high Affectee / outer CAUSEG (fare attribuire / fare riconoscere) wrap Voice; they are not listed inner arguments.

No MeasureP on MERIT. There is no verbal Amount+Denomination object unless Charge itself has been recoded as a share of credit (English lexical entry §5.4 hybrid — flag, do not deepen). Degrees that sneak in (quanto merito, partitives on Charge) live on the Abney spine of a light noun or of Charge — Left Branch Condition for sell / pay / chargeFEE / creditFIN does not apply as a verbal diagnostic here. Italian ne can resume a measured Charge quantity — Abney-side, not a verbal MeasureP (and on FIN ne resumes ledger quantity, not MERIT Charge).

What Group B changes is Case, clitics, and light-noun packaging. What it does not change is the inventory. Weather still satisfies Target and fails Judge. Cause-true is still not entailed. Target and Charge still do not invert at Transfer cost. Treating creditMERIT as Agent > Theme > Goal, or collapsing it with creditFIN because Italian can talk “accreditare” for ledger, predicts a DOC, a HAVE entailment, a MeasureP LBC host, or a grammatical weather-as-Judge — none of those exist on MERIT.

Italian frames · Case clothes

Romance packages merit-ascribe without a productive DOC. Charge can be ACC with Target in a; Target can be ACC with Charge inside di or per; light-noun il merito parks Target in a-PP. Clitics and si demotion are height diagnostics — as in the Transfer / blame Romance supplements — but the class contrast remains: Transfer Themes invert under Neg; MERIT Target and Charge do not. FIN uses accreditare for MeasureP / Account — different root; pointer only below. Keep MERIT on attribuire / merito.

  1. ✓ Gli investitori hanno attribuito il completamento anticipato all'appaltatore. to-style · ACC Charge · a-Target · bare attribuire
  2. ✓ Gli investitori hanno riconosciuto il merito all'appaltatore. light noun · merito · a-Target
  3. ✓ Hanno attribuito il merito all'appaltatore. light-noun companion · Index 2 attribuire
  4. ✓ Gli investitori hanno attribuito l'appaltatore del / per il completamento anticipato. with-style companion · ACC Target · di/per-Charge · scout-leaning
  5. ✓ Non hanno attribuito il completamento anticipato all'appaltatore? polar NegQ · to-style
  6. ✓ Non gli hanno riconosciuto il merito? polar NegQ · light noun · gli = Target
  7. ✓ Gli hanno attribuito il successo. gli = Target; Charge ACC
  8. ✓ Hanno attribuito il successo al maltempo. weather = Target OK
  9. ✓ Non hanno fatto attribuire il successo al comitato? fare wrap · outer CAUSEG
  10. ✓ FIN pointer only: Il consiglio ha accreditato 0,3 ETH su ogni portafoglio. FIN · accreditare · do not deepen
  11. * Il maltempo non ha attribuito il successo all'appaltatore? weather as Judge
  12. * Non hanno attribuito all'appaltatore il completamento anticipato? no productive DOC (bare double object)
  13. * Non hanno attribuito il completamento anticipato sull'appaltatore? no blame on-cloth / su-Target as Charge host for MERIT

NegQ baseline · association tracks ACC / Case object

✓ Non hanno attribuito il completamento anticipato all'appaltatore? to-style · cheap = Charge

✓ Non gli hanno riconosciuto il merito? light noun · gli Target

✓ Non si è attribuito il successo all'appaltatore? si / impersonal · Voice

✓ FIN contrast (pointer): Il consiglio non ha accreditato 0,3 ETH su ogni portafoglio?

* Il maltempo non ha attribuito a nessuno il successo? weather as Judge under Neg

* Non hanno attribuito all'appaltatore il completamento anticipato? no Neg-rescued DOC

# Non hanno attribuito il completamento anticipato all'appaltatore? — meaning the contractor didn’t cause it. cause-true not a default

A bare No on the canonical NegQ most readily challenges the ascription event or the ACC object of the chosen cloth. Challenging the oblique wants that content already under discussion. Negation does not grow a double-object and does not create a MeasureP on MERIT. HOLD is not cause-true — parallel to FIN’s missing payout default (HAS_ON_BOOKS ≠ spendable) and to Italian blame’s missing cause-true default.

WH / NegQ diagnostics · no MeasureP LBC

Unlike sell / payGIVE / chargeFEE / bet / creditFIN, creditMERIT has no verbal MeasureP. There is therefore no Left-Branch Condition of the Amount-from-Denomination type on √ASCRIBE. Degrees that appear are DP-internal on Charge or on the light noun merito / credito.

  1. ✓ Chi non ha attribuito il completamento anticipato all'appaltatore? WH = Judge
  2. ✓ Che cosa non hanno attribuito all'appaltatore? WH = Charge · to-style
  3. ✓ A chi non hanno attribuito il completamento anticipato? WH = Target · to-style
  4. ✓ Di / per che cosa non hanno attribuito l'appaltatore? WH = Charge · di/per companion · scout-leaning
  5. ✓ Quanto merito non gli hanno riconosciuto? degree on light noun · Abney-side, not verbal MeasureP
  6. * Quanto non hanno attribuito di completamento all'appaltatore? no verbal MeasureP LBC host on MERIT
  7. ✓ Hanno attribuito il successo al maltempo. weather = Target · fine
  8. * Non hanno fatto attribuire il successo al maltempo all'appaltatore? weather still not inner Judge under fare

Superiority ranks Judge > ACC > K-DP. Flip a-Target / di·per-Charge and Charge and Target change which participant is the Case object — Case prominence, not a fixed thematic ranking that would force English blame’s Cognizer > Target > Content default onto every Italian cloth. Cheap NegQ association tracks the Case object. There is no ranking of Charge against a silent Purpose, Price, or Theme₂.

a-Target ≠ FIN Account · di/per-Charge ≠ MeasureP

a Target = ascribee — not FIN wallet / Account, not bet Platform, not sell Recipient HAVE. di/per Charge = content of the attitude — not ledger Amount, not sell Price, not pay Consideration, not swap Theme₂, and not Italian blame’s FAULT polarity inside the same di letter. Chat 23: Romance quantity clitics resume FIN quantity, not MERIT Charge. MERIT stays on attribuire / merito; FIN stays on accreditare.

Geometry · creditMERIT ≠ creditFIN ≠ incolpare ≠ attribuireATT ≠ Transfer

In Gli investitori hanno attribuito il completamento anticipato all'appaltatore, the investors hold that the contractor is responsible for the early completion under meritorious evaluation. That is ascription, not HAVE of goods and not ledger INCREMENT. The contractor is Target. The early completion is Charge. HOLD is an attitude; MERITORIOUS(Target, Charge) is content, not a presupposed fact.

English twin spells to-frame Charge ACC / Target to and with-frame Target ACC / Charge with. Japanese twin spells Charge o + Target ni. Spanish twin: to-style Charge ACC / Target a; with-style Target a / Charge de·con; light-noun mérito + a-Target. French twin: to-style Charge ACC / Target à; light-noun mérite + à-Target; de/pour companions scout-leaning. Italian twin: to-style Charge ACC / Target a; light-noun merito + a-Target; di/per companions scout-leaning. Weather OK as Target, *not* as Judge.

Shells, ApplP, and Case

Base tree (ascribe-merit · Italian clothes)

to-style (attribuire Charge a Target):
VoiceP  [ JudgeNOM
  vP / √ASCRIBE
    ACC               Charge
    PP_a              Target ]

with-style companion (attribuire Target di/per Charge) · scout-leaning:
VoiceP  [ JudgeNOM
  vP / √ASCRIBE
    ACC               Target
    PP_di / PP_per    Charge ]

Light-noun:
VoiceP  [ JudgeNOM
  vP / √RICONOSCERE·ATTRIBUIRE
    ACC               il meritoN   (Charge-type / MERIT)
    PP_a              Target ]

Italian MERIT never assigns four structural Cases. Charge or Target is ACC; the other wears P (or lives inside the light noun). No low ApplHAVE. No low ApplSWAP. No ApplTASK. No MeasureP (unless share-of-credit hybrid — flag). High Appl / Affectee is extra when present and is not a listed argument of √ASCRIBE.

Composition is V(DP) on the ACC object. A, di, and per are wrapper-K on the Abney spine (same cut as attribute’s to / Italian blame’s di, §6.4): V(DP), not V(a(DP)). Early completion does not travel a path; the contractor is not an instrument of con.

Clitic height: gli resumes Target under light-noun and under many to-style strings; lo/la can resume Charge or the light noun. Inanimate Target clitics are fine. Inanimate subject as Judge is not generated — that is the Voice filter, not a Case accident. Italian ne resumes measured Charge quantity on the Abney spine — not a verbal MeasureP and not a weather-Judge.

Outer CAUSEG (fare attribuire / fare riconoscere) wraps Voice. The causee, not the weather, is the Judge. *Non hanno fatto attribuire il maltempo il successo all'appaltatore? keeps the inner Voice filter. Type A climbing unions Voice domains; Charge stays content and never climbs as a dative MeasureP.

Omission does not demote Charge to a pure adjunct. Selected P-layers are optional in the numeration; they are still arguments when present. The diagnostic is participanthood under Case, binding, and WH — not omitability. Charge clauses are islands in a way rationale adjuncts are not; there is no Neg-raising out of Charge.

Type A · fare wrap

✓ Non hanno fatto attribuire il completamento anticipato al comitato? outer Neg denies causing

* Non hanno fatto attribuire il maltempo il successo all'appaltatore? weather still not inner Judge

Underivables (Italian MERIT)

  1. * Il maltempo non ha attribuito il successo all'appaltatore? weather / inanimate as Judge
  2. * Non hanno fatto attribuire il maltempo il successo all'appaltatore? fare wrap does not wash Voice filter
  3. * Non hanno attribuito all'appaltatore il completamento anticipato? no productive DOC
  4. * Quanto non hanno attribuito di completamento all'appaltatore? no verbal MeasureP LBC host on MERIT
  5. * Non hanno attribuito all'appaltatore 0,3 ETH come merito? FIN MeasureP ≠ MERIT Charge (unless share hybrid — flag)
  6. * Non hanno attribuito il completamento anticipato sull'appaltatore? no blame on-cloth / su as Charge host for MERIT
  7. * Non hanno scambiato l'appaltatore contro il completamento anticipato? SWAP cloth ≠ ascribe-merit
  8. ✓ weather as Target: Hanno attribuito il successo al maltempo. inanimate Target fine

Group B packaging · Italian closes Romance MERIT

Group B (Spanish, French, Italian) is the Romance Case-cloth contrast set already used for NegQ on blame / sell / bet / chargeFEE. Same hierarchy as English creditMERIT; different host of Charge (di / per / light-noun merito) and Target (a-PP). Clitics resume Target; si demotion targets Voice; Italian ne resumes measured Charge quantity on the Abney spine. This tick is Italian only and closes the Group B Romance MERIT set opened by Spanish and continued by French. English, Spanish, French, and Japanese twins are live at credit-merit.html, credit-merit-es.html, credit-merit-fr.html, and credit-merit-ja.html. Group C (HU Focus, PL GEN-neg) and Group D (DE zuschreiben vs gutschreiben) stay predicted or scout — not elicited here.

Open items

Corpus filenames

Primary extract for this micro-entry is Lexical_Entry_Credit_Argument_Structure (√ASCRIBE vs √CREDIT_LEDGER; Romance morphology split). NegQ association maps from Negative_Questions_Credit (Romance quantity clitics resume FIN quantity, not MERIT Charge). Chat packaging: Tritransitive chats 23 (NegQ on credit · two-root · Groups A–D), 25 (credit attitude vs transfer · Romance attribuer vs créditer), and 35 (credit argument-structure acceptability). Italian blame twin geometry shared with blame-it.html (Group B §9). Constructed IT frames diagnose packaging; they are not new elicitation.

Series placement: Italian sense×language twin of English creditMERIT, Spanish acreditar, French attribuer, and Japanese 功績を認める. Closes Group B Romance MERIT (ES → FR → IT). Feeds Attitude / Evaluation Index 2 beside incolpare. Keeps FIN at creditFIN / ledger accreditare. Does not invent ZH/NV merit elicitation. Speculation flagged.

Index 2 citations for this class

Attitude / Evaluation citations from Index 2
CodeLanguageIndex 2 citationAs printed
ENEnglishblame EN micro-entry, creditMERIT EN micro-entry, attributeVols. 1, 3
ESSpanishculpar ES micro-entry, creditMERIT · acreditar ES micro-entry, atribuirVols. 3, 5
FRFrenchblâmer FR micro-entry, creditMERIT · attribuer FR micro-entry, attribuerVols. 3, 5
ITItalianincolpare IT micro-entry, creditMERIT · attribuire IT micro-entry, attribuireVols. 3, 5
HUHungarianhibáztat, okol, tulajdonít, elismer, jóváírVols. 3, 6
BGBulgarianобвинявам / виня, приписвам / отдавамVols. 3, 6
PLPolishobwiniać / winić, przypisywaćVols. 3, 6
DEGermanbeschuldigen, verantwortlich machen, zuschreibenVol. 7
NLDutchde schuld geven, toeschrijvenVol. 7
NONorwegianlegge skylden påVol. 7

Languages Index 2 does not list for this class are left off the table. Japanese MERIT sits Beyond Index 2 (no Attitude JA cell) at credit-merit-ja.html.