Working paper. French micro-entry continuing the Group B Romance MERIT set (ES → FR → IT). Geometry from Lexical_Entry_Credit_Argument_Structure and NegQ association maps from Negative_Questions_Credit (Romance morphology split attribuer/atribuir ascribe vs créditer/acreditar-ledger; en resumes FIN quantity, not MERIT Charge). Constructed diagnostics diagnose Case clothes (à / de / pour), light-noun mérite, Voice filter, and the MERIT / FIN root split; they are not spontaneous-speech citations. English, Spanish, and Japanese twins already live; Italian merit twin is live at credit-merit-it.html.
Constructed examples. Frames below are packaging hypotheses aligned with the lexical entry, chat 23 / 25 Romance split notes, and the French blame twin (blâmer … pour). Cause-true and settlement are not entailed — same missing defaults as English creditMERIT, attributeATT, and blame. Do not fake elicitation. FIN strings appear only as contrast pointers.
Sense-class · FIN/MERIT split (cleaner than Spanish). Index 2 lists French Attitude as blâmer, attribuer (Vols. 3, 5). This page deepens the merit / ascribe-positive reading as √ASCRIBE (+). Romance usually splits morphology more cleanly than English or Spanish: attribuer / light-noun mérite host MERIT; créditer / créditer un compte host FIN / ledger (√CREDIT_LEDGER pointer at creditFIN). Flag any surface overlap; do not deepen FIN here. MERIT has no MeasureP and no Account.
Scout / deferred. Italian MERIT is live at credit-merit-it.html (attribuire / riconoscere il merito). Relative productivity of bare attribuer vs light-noun reconnaître / attribuer le mérite is scout-leaning where the extract lists forms without ranking them. No fake elicitation.

Hierarchy

Same inventory as English creditMERIT, Spanish acreditar, and Japanese 功績を認める. Not five-place. Not four sisters of one V. Surface count can name the investors, the early completion, and the contractor — but the lexicon does not list four co-arguments of √ASCRIBE / √ATTRIBU-.

Intended labeling (shared with English)

√ASCRIBE (positive / meritorious) + VoiceJ(Judge) + Charge + Target  ·  hierarchy Cognizer / Judge > Charge / Content > Target

Voice introduces Judge (proto-Agent of the attitude). The ascription relates Target to Charge under positive / meritorious HOLD. French spells productive clothes as Charge ACC + à-Target (attribuer Charge à Target), Target ACC + de/pour-Charge companions where natural, and light-noun on-geometry (reconnaître / attribuer le mérite à Target). Optional high Affectee / outer CAUSEG (faire attribuer / faire reconnaître) wrap Voice; they are not listed inner arguments.

No MeasureP on MERIT. There is no verbal Amount+Denomination object unless Charge itself has been recoded as a share of credit (English lexical entry §5.4 hybrid — flag, do not deepen). Degrees that sneak in (combien de mérite, partitives on Charge) live on the Abney spine of a light noun or of Charge — Left Branch Condition for sell / pay / chargeFEE / creditFIN does not apply as a verbal diagnostic here. French en can resume a measured Charge quantity — Abney-side, not a verbal MeasureP (and on FIN en resumes ledger quantity, not MERIT Charge).

What Group B changes is Case, clitics, and light-noun packaging. What it does not change is the inventory. Weather still satisfies Target and fails Judge. Cause-true is still not entailed. Target and Charge still do not invert at Transfer cost. Treating creditMERIT as Agent > Theme > Goal, or collapsing it with creditFIN because French can talk “créditer” for ledger, predicts a DOC, a HAVE entailment, a MeasureP LBC host, or a grammatical weather-as-Judge — none of those exist on MERIT.

French frames · Case clothes

Romance packages merit-ascribe without a productive DOC. Charge can be ACC with Target in à; Target can be ACC with Charge inside de or pour; light-noun le mérite parks Target in à-PP. Clitics and se/on demotion are height diagnostics — as in the Transfer / blame Romance supplements — but the class contrast remains: Transfer Themes invert under Neg; MERIT Target and Charge do not. FIN uses créditer / créditer un compte for MeasureP / Account — different root; pointer only below. Keep MERIT on attribuer / mérite.

  1. ✓ Les investisseurs ont attribué l'achèvement anticipé au contractant. to-style · ACC Charge · à-Target · bare attribuer
  2. ✓ Les investisseurs ont reconnu le mérite au contractant. light noun · mérite · à-Target
  3. ✓ Ils ont attribué le mérite au contractant. light-noun companion · Index 2 attribuer
  4. ✓ Les investisseurs ont attribué le contractant de / pour l'achèvement anticipé. with-style companion · ACC Target · de/pour-Charge · scout-leaning
  5. ✓ N'ont-ils pas attribué l'achèvement anticipé au contractant ? polar NegQ · to-style
  6. ✓ Ne lui ont-ils pas reconnu le mérite ? polar NegQ · light noun · lui = Target
  7. ✓ Ils lui ont attribué le succès. lui = Target; Charge ACC
  8. ✓ Ils ont attribué le succès au mauvais temps. weather = Target OK
  9. ✓ N'ont-ils pas fait attribuer le succès au comité ? faire wrap · outer CAUSEG
  10. ✓ FIN pointer only: Le conseil a crédité 0,3 ETH sur chaque portefeuille. FIN · créditer · do not deepen
  11. * Le mauvais temps n'a-t-il pas attribué le succès au contractant ? weather as Judge
  12. * N'ont-ils pas attribué au contractant l'achèvement anticipé ? no productive DOC (bare double object)
  13. * N'ont-ils pas attribué l'achèvement anticipé sur le contractant ? no blame on-cloth / sur-Target as Charge host for MERIT

NegQ baseline · association tracks ACC / Case object

✓ N'ont-ils pas attribué l'achèvement anticipé au contractant ? to-style · cheap = Charge

✓ Ne lui ont-ils pas reconnu le mérite ? light noun · lui Target

✓ N'a-t-on pas attribué le succès au contractant ? on / impersonal · Voice

✓ FIN contrast (pointer): Le conseil n'a-t-il pas crédité 0,3 ETH sur chaque portefeuille ?

* Le mauvais temps n'a-t-il attribué à personne le succès ? weather as Judge under Neg

* N'ont-ils pas attribué au contractant l'achèvement anticipé ? no Neg-rescued DOC

# N'ont-ils pas attribué l'achèvement anticipé au contractant ? — meaning the contractor didn’t cause it. cause-true not a default

A bare Non on the canonical NegQ most readily challenges the ascription event or the ACC object of the chosen cloth. Challenging the oblique wants that content already under discussion. Negation does not grow a double-object and does not create a MeasureP on MERIT. HOLD is not cause-true — parallel to FIN’s missing payout default (HAS_ON_BOOKS ≠ spendable) and to French blame’s missing cause-true default.

WH / NegQ diagnostics · no MeasureP LBC

Unlike sell / payGIVE / chargeFEE / bet / creditFIN, creditMERIT has no verbal MeasureP. There is therefore no Left-Branch Condition of the Amount-from-Denomination type on √ASCRIBE. Degrees that appear are DP-internal on Charge or on the light noun mérite / crédit.

  1. ✓ Qui n'a pas attribué l'achèvement anticipé au contractant ? WH = Judge
  2. ✓ Qu'ont-ils pas attribué au contractant ? WH = Charge · to-style
  3. ✓ À qui n'ont-ils pas attribué l'achèvement anticipé ? WH = Target · to-style
  4. ✓ De / pour quoi n'ont-ils pas attribué le contractant ? WH = Charge · de/pour companion · scout-leaning
  5. ✓ Combien de mérite ne lui ont-ils pas reconnu ? degree on light noun · Abney-side, not verbal MeasureP
  6. * Combien n'ont-ils pas attribué d'achèvement au contractant ? no verbal MeasureP LBC host on MERIT
  7. ✓ Ils ont attribué le succès au mauvais temps. weather = Target · fine
  8. * N'ont-ils pas fait attribuer le succès au mauvais temps au contractant ? weather still not inner Judge under faire

Superiority ranks Judge > ACC > K-DP. Flip à-Target / de·pour-Charge and Charge and Target change which participant is the Case object — Case prominence, not a fixed thematic ranking that would force English blame’s Cognizer > Target > Content default onto every French cloth. Cheap NegQ association tracks the Case object. There is no ranking of Charge against a silent Purpose, Price, or Theme₂.

à-Target ≠ FIN Account · de/pour-Charge ≠ MeasureP

à Target = ascribee — not FIN wallet / Account, not bet Platform, not sell Recipient HAVE. de/pour Charge = content of the attitude — not ledger Amount, not sell Price, not pay Consideration, not swap Theme₂, and not French blame’s FAULT polarity inside the same pour letter. Chat 23: Romance en resumes FIN quantity, not MERIT Charge. MERIT stays on attribuer / mérite; FIN stays on créditer.

Geometry · creditMERIT ≠ creditFIN ≠ blâmer ≠ attribuerATT ≠ Transfer

In Les investisseurs ont attribué l'achèvement anticipé au contractant, the investors hold that the contractor is responsible for the early completion under meritorious evaluation. That is ascription, not HAVE of goods and not ledger INCREMENT. The contractor is Target. The early completion is Charge. HOLD is an attitude; MERITORIOUS(Target, Charge) is content, not a presupposed fact.

English twin spells to-frame Charge ACC / Target to and with-frame Target ACC / Charge with. Japanese twin spells Charge o + Target ni. Spanish twin: to-style Charge ACC / Target a; with-style Target a / Charge de·con; light-noun mérito + a-Target. French twin: to-style Charge ACC / Target à; light-noun mérite + à-Target; de/pour companions scout-leaning. Weather OK as Target, *not* as Judge.

Shells, ApplP, and Case

Base tree (ascribe-merit · French clothes)

to-style (attribuer Charge à Target):
VoiceP  [ JudgeNOM
  vP / √ASCRIBE
    ACC               Charge
    PP_à              Target ]

with-style companion (attribuer Target de/pour Charge) · scout-leaning:
VoiceP  [ JudgeNOM
  vP / √ASCRIBE
    ACC               Target
    PP_de / PP_pour   Charge ]

Light-noun:
VoiceP  [ JudgeNOM
  vP / √RECONNAÎTRE·ATTRIBUER
    ACC               le mériteN   (Charge-type / MERIT)
    PP_à              Target ]

French MERIT never assigns four structural Cases. Charge or Target is ACC; the other wears P (or lives inside the light noun). No low ApplHAVE. No low ApplSWAP. No ApplTASK. No MeasureP (unless share-of-credit hybrid — flag). High Appl / Affectee is extra when present and is not a listed argument of √ASCRIBE.

Composition is V(DP) on the ACC object. À, de, and pour are wrapper-K on the Abney spine (same cut as attribute’s to / French blame’s pour, §6.4): V(DP), not V(à(DP)). Early completion does not travel a path; the contractor is not an instrument of avec.

Clitic height: lui resumes Target under light-noun and under many to-style strings; le/la can resume Charge or the light noun. Inanimate Target clitics are fine. Inanimate subject as Judge is not generated — that is the Voice filter, not a Case accident. French en resumes measured Charge quantity on the Abney spine — not a verbal MeasureP and not a weather-Judge.

Outer CAUSEG (faire attribuer / faire reconnaître) wraps Voice. The causee, not the weather, is the Judge. *N'ont-ils pas fait attribuer le mauvais temps le succès au contractant ? keeps the inner Voice filter. Type A climbing unions Voice domains; Charge stays content and never climbs as a dative MeasureP.

Omission does not demote Charge to a pure adjunct. Selected P-layers are optional in the numeration; they are still arguments when present. The diagnostic is participanthood under Case, binding, and WH — not omitability. Charge clauses are islands in a way rationale adjuncts are not; there is no Neg-raising out of Charge.

Type A · faire wrap

✓ N'ont-ils pas fait attribuer l'achèvement anticipé au comité ? outer Neg denies causing

* N'ont-ils pas fait attribuer le mauvais temps le succès au contractant ? weather still not inner Judge

Underivables (French MERIT)

  1. * Le mauvais temps n'a-t-il pas attribué le succès au contractant ? weather / inanimate as Judge
  2. * N'ont-ils pas fait attribuer le mauvais temps le succès au contractant ? faire wrap does not wash Voice filter
  3. * N'ont-ils pas attribué au contractant l'achèvement anticipé ? no productive DOC
  4. * Combien n'ont-ils pas attribué d'achèvement au contractant ? no verbal MeasureP LBC host on MERIT
  5. * N'ont-ils pas attribué au contractant 0,3 ETH comme mérite ? FIN MeasureP ≠ MERIT Charge (unless share hybrid — flag)
  6. * N'ont-ils pas attribué l'achèvement anticipé sur le contractant ? no blame on-cloth / sur as Charge host for MERIT
  7. * N'ont-ils pas échangé le contractant contre l'achèvement anticipé ? SWAP cloth ≠ ascribe-merit
  8. ✓ weather as Target: Ils ont attribué le succès au mauvais temps. inanimate Target fine

Group B packaging · French continues Romance MERIT

Group B (Spanish, French, Italian) is the Romance Case-cloth contrast set already used for NegQ on blame / sell / bet / chargeFEE. Same hierarchy as English creditMERIT; different host of Charge (de / pour / light-noun mérite) and Target (à-PP). Clitics resume Target; se/on demotion targets Voice; French en resumes measured Charge quantity on the Abney spine. This tick is French only and continues the Group B Romance MERIT set opened by Spanish. English, Spanish, and Japanese twins are live at credit-merit.html, credit-merit-es.html, and credit-merit-ja.html. Italian merit micro-entry is live at credit-merit-it.html. Group C (HU Focus, PL GEN-neg) and Group D (DE zuschreiben vs gutschreiben) stay predicted or scout — not elicited here.

Open items

Corpus filenames

Primary extract for this micro-entry is Lexical_Entry_Credit_Argument_Structure (√ASCRIBE vs √CREDIT_LEDGER; Romance morphology split). NegQ association maps from Negative_Questions_Credit (Romance en resumes FIN quantity, not MERIT Charge). Chat packaging: Tritransitive chats 23 (NegQ on credit · two-root · Groups A–D), 25 (credit attitude vs transfer · Romance attribuer vs créditer), and 35 (credit argument-structure acceptability). French blame twin geometry shared with blame-fr.html (Group B §9). Constructed FR frames diagnose packaging; they are not new elicitation.

Series placement: French sense×language twin of English creditMERIT, Spanish acreditar, and Japanese 功績を認める. Continues Group B Romance MERIT (ES → FR; IT next). Feeds Attitude / Evaluation Index 2 beside blâmer. Keeps FIN at creditFIN / ledger créditer. Does not invent IT/ZH/NV merit elicitation. Speculation flagged.

Index 2 citations for this class

Attitude / Evaluation citations from Index 2
CodeLanguageIndex 2 citationAs printed
ENEnglishblame EN micro-entry, creditMERIT EN micro-entry, attributeVols. 1, 3
ESSpanishculpar ES micro-entry, creditMERIT · acreditar ES micro-entry, atribuirVols. 3, 5
FRFrenchblâmer FR micro-entry, creditMERIT · attribuer FR micro-entry, attribuerVols. 3, 5
ITItalianincolpare IT micro-entry, attribuireVols. 3, 5
HUHungarianhibáztat, okol, tulajdonít, elismer, jóváírVols. 3, 6
BGBulgarianобвинявам / виня, приписвам / отдавамVols. 3, 6
PLPolishobwiniać / winić, przypisywaćVols. 3, 6
DEGermanbeschuldigen, verantwortlich machen, zuschreibenVol. 7
NLDutchde schuld geven, toeschrijvenVol. 7
NONorwegianlegge skylden påVol. 7

Languages Index 2 does not list for this class are left off the table. Japanese MERIT sits Beyond Index 2 (no Attitude JA cell) at credit-merit-ja.html.