charge_FEE · belaste

Hierarchy

Same inventory as English charge_FEE and the live German and Dutch twins. Not four-place. Surface count can name a workshop, a payer, twenty, euros, and a meal. The lexicon does not list four co-arguments of √CHARGE_FEE. Group D does not add a fourth argument. Norwegian adds V2, a med-exponent of the Amount, and a for-swipe. It does not add a second structural object beside the MeasureP, and it does not add a HAVE shell.

The fee is one MeasureP. Amount and Denomination are inner arguments of that object. Composition is V(MeasureP), not V(n)(U). A bare hva that is not the for-swipe is the whole QP or a fee-type first, on the same denomination note as the German rows. Denomination alone is the marked reading. The Norwegian currency question that would ask it directly is constructed. The printed Norwegian swipe is Consideration, and Consideration is a P, not U.

Geometry is 1+2 with optional outer Consideration: one Initiator, one applied Source, one measuring object. Shared letters with betale are not Appl_HAVE. V2 is a T-copy. hva … for resumes for. It does not resume euro minus tjue, and it does not resume med.

Working hierarchy: Chargor > Payer/Source_ACC > MeasureP ⟨n,U⟩ (> for-Consideration). Cloth B Case: Payer accusative, Amount in med. The DOC-looking question is a surface of that FROM geometry. It is not a fourth GF and it is not German cloth A’s dative.

Norwegian frames · cloth B, one printed question

belaste is the FEE name the Group D notes print for Norwegian. Present belaster, preterite belastet, perfect har belastet are tense of that lemma, not a second root. There is no separable particle: med is the preposition of the Amount, the same way på is a preposition on godskrive and on legge skylden på. It is not a Focus particle. siktet is the ACCUSE pair, a different root. Do not merge it with the levy. Live blame stays legge skylden på.

1. ✓ Belastet de Pat tjue euro? printed · V2 question · DOC-looking surface · still FROM · Pat and tjue euro bare · not a HAVE double object · not a fourth argument
2. ✓ belaste Chase med femtitusen printed citation · cloth B · ACC Chase · med-Amount · no currency word is printed on this string, so none is added
3. ✓ hva … for printed swipe · Consideration · the P, not U · thinner than German wofür / womit / worauf

1. ✓ De belastet Chase med femtitusen. constructed finite of the printed citation · ACC Payer · med-Amount
2. ✓ Verkstedet belastet Pat med tjue euro. constructed · workshop Initiator · printed amount tjue euro · med cloth · parallel to German cloth B, not a Norwegian interview
3. ✓ Har de ikke belastet Pat med tjue euro? constructed · ikke after the finite verb · no GEN-neg · ACC stays the Payer
4. ✓ I går belastet de Pat med tjue euro. constructed · V2 · whole finite verb · med stays a preposition · not a stranded particle · not a Focus host
5. ✓ Hva belastet de Pat for? constructed spelling of printed hva … for · Consideration · not the unit · not med
6. ✓ Pat ble belastet med tjue euro. constructed · bli promotes the accusative of the cloth · that accusative is the Payer · med stays
7. ✓ Belastet parkeringsautomaten Pat med tjue euro? constructed Voice pair · institutional Initiator · parallel to German Parkautomat · not a printed Norwegian cell
8. * Belastet været Pat med tjue euro? constructed Voice filter · weather fails Chargor
9. * Pat fikk tjue euro belastet. constructed · få out · dative mostly gone · same cut as credit-fin-no.html and blame-no.html

MeasureP WH / NegQ · denomination, hva … for, LBC

WH forces Amount ≠ Denomination inside one MeasureP. Verbal WH sees that object. hva … for follows the Consideration P. It does not follow a fixed theta name, and it does not follow med. ikke does not rewrite the QP into a genitive. That rewrite is Polish, live at charge-fee-pl.html. There is no unique preverbal Focus host, so these questions are not Hungarian particle-separation. The printed Group D denomination cells are German. The printed Norwegian swipe is hva … for only. The other Norwegian lines are the same diagnostic in Norwegian forms. They are constructed.

1. ✓ hva … for printed · Consideration · P, not U · not a German wofür cell recopied as Norwegian
2. ✓ Hva belastet de Pat for? constructed spelling of that swipe · for stranded · not the unit
3. ✓ Hva belaster de? constructed · parallel to printed Was berechnen Sie? · QP or fee-type first · U marked · not a printed Norwegian cell
4. ✓ I hvilken valuta belaster de? constructed currency menu · λU · this i is the currency PP · not printed
5. ✓ Hvor mange euro belaster de Pat med? constructed · whole MeasureP inside med · unit inside the WH · not a printed womit cell
6. ✓ Hvor mye belaster de Pat med? constructed · degree WH · U bound · Amount stays in med
7. * Hva tjue belaster de? LBC · parallel to printed Was zwanzig berechnen Sie? · underivable · not a printed Norwegian cell
8. * Hva tjue har de ikke belastet Pat med? same LBC under ikke · constructed
9. * Hva tjue belastet de Pat for? unit cannot ride out of Consideration for · parallel to Für was zwanzig · constructed
10. * Hvor mye belaster de euro med? degree out, unit stranded · same LBC as Hvor mye har styret ETH godskrevet
11. * Hva har de for tjue belastet? hva … for does not decompose onto a unit remnant · parallel to Wo … für zwanzig

A packaging bracket for the med cloth, no WH, is [CP belastet_T [TP de₁ [T' t_T [VoiceP t₁ [ApplP Pat [VP [PP med tjue euro] belastet]]]]]]. Chains are {de₁, t₁} INIT and {belastet_T, t_T} V2. med is the Amount exponent, not a chain of its own. These brackets are a packaging hypothesis aligned with the German V2 traces. They are not an interview. The printed question Belastet de Pat tjue euro? uses the same V2 copy and shows the Amount bare. That surface does not add a theta. Superiority and multiple WH are not given a Norwegian paradigm here, and they are not Hungarian Focus uniqueness.

GEN-neg · N/A

Norwegian has no genitive of negation. ikke does not rewrite the MeasureP, and it does not rewrite the accusative Payer, into a genitive. The live Norwegian pages already say this: blame-no.html keeps the accusative on skylden under ikke, and credit-fin-no.html keeps the measuring object under ikke with no genitive spell-out. This page uses the same fact on the levy. No Norwegian genitive string is printed, so none is starred as if elicited.

The host of a genitive rewrite of the measuring QP is Polish, live at obciążyć / naliczyć (tej kwoty, trzech tokenów). Live Hungarian felszámol keeps the fee accusative under nem and separates fel-. Live German belasten leaves the accusative Payer accusative under nicht and keeps the Amount in mit. Those facts stay on those pages. Norwegian does not import the genitive and does not import the particle.

1. ✓ Har de ikke belastet Pat med tjue euro? accusative stays the Payer · med stays · ikke after the finite verb · no case rewrite
2. ✓ FIN parallel, not this root: Ble 0,3 ETH ikke godskrevet på kontoen? shape on credit-fin-no.html · bli promotes MeasureP there · no GEN-neg
3. ✓ blame parallel, not this root: Har de ikke lagt skylden for forsinkelsen på entreprenøren? accusative stays the noun · blame-no.html · that for is Charge
4. ✓ PL parallel, the cut this page does not copy: Rada nie obciążyła tej kwoty. GEN-neg on the measuring QP · charge-fee-pl.html
5. * A genitive rewrite of the QP under ikke. N/A · that host is Polish · no Norwegian genitive string is printed

Geometry · charge_FEE beside the live Norwegian roots

In the FEE geometry the Payer is the person the money comes FROM. e2 is debit / OWE of ⟨n,U⟩ on that Payer. A later payment does not have to be true for the levy to be true. Shared surface letters with pay do not flip FROM into HAVE. The DOC-looking question does not flip it either. The accusative Payer of cloth B is Case packaging of Appl_FROM, the same split German writes with belasten + mit.

• betale / overføre / pay_GIVE. Index 2 Payment cites betale, overføre. Payment-true is that later event, not e2 of belaste. No filled payment-versus-levy pair is printed in the Norwegian FEE notes, so none is filed as an elicited contrast. The direction is the shared FROM dual. ta betalt is the named get-paid companion, still unfilled, and it is not this Payment cell.
• sell. Price is a MeasureP of a HAVE-goods root. On a charge, for hosts Consideration, and hva … for swipes it. Shared for would be Price of sell and Consideration of charge. It does not give one shell. No Norwegian sell micro-entry is opened here. sell·Navajo stays deferred.
• deduct. Shared FROM + MeasureP. English deduct keeps Domain as a from-PP. The live Norwegian ledger page already rejects fra on an account as the TO cloth of godskrive and points that fra at trekke fra. That is not this levy, and it is not a Norwegian deduct page. No deduct page this tick.
• siktet / charge_ACCUSE. Judge > Target > Accusation. Different root. No selected MeasureP. for on sikte is Accusation. The notes name the pair and do not print a worked siktet string, so none is added. See charge-accuse.html.
• legge skylden på. Live at blame-no.html. Index 2 Attitude. The accusative is the light noun, not the person. Target is på. Charge for is the printed contrast on that page. On this page for is FEE Consideration, swiped by hva … for. Same preposition letter, different licenser. Guilt-true is that root’s business, not e2 of the levy. tilskrive stays live ATT and MERIT, not the blame lemma and not this lemma.
• charge_ACCOUNT. A to-card destination is book-entry. This plate does not give it a Norwegian lemma. German worauf resumes a card on charge-fee-de.html. Norwegian does not print that resumption. Keep the sister on charge-account.html.
• godskrive / credit_FIN. Live at credit-fin-no.html. TO ledger increment. The printed string is Styret har godskrevet 0,3 ETH på kontoen. HAS_ON_BOOKS is that page’s e2. Opposite polarity from FROM. på there is the Account. med here is the Amount. The bound prefix god- is that lemma’s morphology. belaste has no such prefix. bli on the ledger page promotes the MeasureP. bli on this cloth promotes the accusative Payer. Same Voice discipline, different accusative.
• tilskrive / credit_MERIT and attribute_ATT. Live at credit-merit-no.html and attribute-att-no.html. Content ascription: til-Target + accusative Charge. No MeasureP. No Appl_FROM of money. bli there promotes Charge. få is out on those pages too, because the dative is mostly gone. An accusative on those pages is the content. The accusative on this page is the Payer.
• German cloth A and Dutch cloth A. Live berechnen spells the Payer as dative and the MeasureP as accusative. Live in rekening brengen is one complex predicate and leaves Payer Case open. Norwegian does not copy the dative and does not copy the complex predicate. The parallel that is filed is German cloth B: accusative Payer, Amount in a with-preposition. Dutch waarvoor is a full R-pronoun. Norwegian prints the thinner swipe hva … for.
• Hungarian Focus and Polish GEN-neg. Live felszámol separates fel- under one preverbal host. Live obciążyć / naliczyć rewrites the measuring QP under nie. Norwegian ikke leaves the accusative Payer and leaves med as a preposition. Do not import the particle. Do not import the genitive rewrite.
• Debit-true is e2. Goods-HAVE is sell’s e2. HAS_ON_BOOKS is godskrive’s e2. Guilt is siktet’s and legge skylden på’s business. Payment-true is betale / overføre. None of those is e2 of belaste.

Passives are a Voice test and not a new argument. bli promotes the accusative of the cloth, the Payer, and leaves the Amount in med. få does not promote a missing dative. No further passive paradigm is printed, so none is filed. The German passives cut’s map stays on charge-fee-de.html.

Shells, ApplP, and Case

1. M1√CHARGE_FEE merges with MeasureP ⟨Amount, Denom⟩
2. M2Appl_FROM merges Payer · accusative on cloth B
3. M3Voice merges Chargor · med is the Amount exponent
4. A4v ↔ accusative Payer · ikke does not write a genitive
5. V5V2 · {belastet_T, t_T} · not a theta chain
6. V6hva … for fronts · unit stays inside MeasureP
7. F7Voice filter · weather ≠ Chargor · bli promotes Payer · få out
8. G8Gold · debit / OWE ≠ betale · LBC holds · no fourth argument · GEN-neg N/A

[CP belastet_T [TP de_1 [T' t_T [VoiceP t_1
  [ApplP Pat_ACC
    [VP [PP med tjue euro]
        belastet]]]]]]
{de_1, t_1} INIT · {belastet_T, t_T} V2
med is the Amount exponent, not a chain
the accusative is the Payer

[CP hva_3 [C' belastet_T [TP de_1 [T' t_T
  [VoiceP t_1 [ApplP Pat_ACC
    [VP [PP med femtitusen] [PP for t_3] belastet]]]]]]]
hva … for resumes for · it does not resume med
it does not resume euro minus tjue
R-inventory is this swipe, not wofür / womit / worauf

λn ∃e ∃x ∃U [ CHARGE(e) ∧ INIT(e, xChargor) ∧ FROM(e, xPayer)
  ∧ TH(e, ⟨n, U⟩) ∧ CONSID(e, z) ]

Voice introduces Chargor. Appl_FROM introduces Payer. MeasureP sits as Incremental Theme of the debit. Consideration attaches under for. There is no Recipient HAVE shell, no Hungarian verb-modifier slot, and no English double object of two bare Themes as a second geometry. Putting HAVE, a stranded unit, or a third object of Consideration into belaste is how a four-place accident gets written.

Proto-roles are shell-local. Chargor is a partial Proto-Agent (workshop, bank, meter, script). Payer is Proto-Source, not Proto-Recipient. MeasureP is Incremental Theme of the debit. Denomination is not a further theta role. A stranded for is not a theta role. med is not a theta role of its own. It is the exponent of the Amount.

Underivables (Norwegian)

1. * Hva tjue belaster de? LBC · parallel to the printed German cell · underivable · constructed
2. * Hva tjue belastet de Pat for? unit out of Consideration for · constructed
3. * Hvor mye belaster de euro med? unit stranded next to med · constructed
4. * Hva har de for tjue belastet? hva … for does not split onto euro minus tjue · constructed
5. * Belastet været Pat med tjue euro? Voice filter · constructed
6. * Pat fikk tjue euro belastet. få out · no dative to promote · constructed
7. * Tjue euro ble belastet Pat. bli promotes the accusative of the cloth, the Payer · the Amount is not that accusative · constructed
8. * A fee MeasureP on sikte, or an accusation on belaste. different roots · for on sikte is Accusation · no filled Norwegian string is printed, so none is starred as if elicited
9. * A genitive rewrite of the QP under ikke. N/A · host is Polish obciążyć / naliczyć
10. * A unique Focus host, or a particle separated under ikke. Hungarian felszámol · med is a preposition · not this page
11. * First-out-of-the-blue U as the default of bare hva. denomination note · marked U · currency menu is the direct question · hva … for is Consideration
12. * Payer + MeasureP as a HAVE double object, or a dative Payer copied from German cloth A. DOC-looking surface stays FROM · German DAT/ACC split stays on charge-fee-de.html
13. * A filled Case frame for ta betalt. named companion · no frame printed · light-verb / get-paid scout · not a second cloth
14. * Payment entailed by the levy. e2 is debit / OWE · betale / overføre are later · Index 2 Payment stays those two
15. * Ledger godskrive, or ATT/MERIT tilskrive, as this MeasureP. live on their own pages · på there is Account or not used · til there is Target

Group D packaging · Norwegian FEE closes the set

Group D (German, Dutch, Norwegian) is the V2 / R-pronoun set already named on charge_FEE · English. Same hierarchy as the English levy. Group C is closed: Hungarian felszámol (Focus and fel-), Bulgarian таксувам (WH clusters; за Consideration), Polish obciążyć / naliczyć (genitive of negation on the measuring QP). German berechnen / belasten opened Group D with two Case cloths. Dutch in rekening brengen continued it with one complex predicate. This page is Norwegian FEE only, and it closes Group D FEE. The Norwegian cloth is accusative Payer + med-Amount on belaste, the cloth B parallel, plus the printed DOC-looking question that stays FROM. ta betalt is named and unfilled. siktet stays on charge_ACCUSE. Live legge skylden på stays on blame-no.html.

Against German cloth A, Norwegian does not rank the Payer as dative. Against Dutch, Norwegian does not file a complex predicate and does not leave the Payer’s Case unfilled: the filled cloth’s accusative is the Payer. What sits in C is V2 belastet or har, not a Romance finite-verb copy and not a Hungarian Focus host. hva … for extracts for. It does not extract the denomination. The R-inventory is that swipe. German womit and worauf stay on the German page.

Open items

• ta betalt. Named companion. Light-verb / get-paid framing. No Case frame, no med, and no for are printed on it. None is ranked. It is not a second FEE cloth.
• DOC-looking surface beside med. Both are printed: Belastet de Pat tjue euro? and belaste Chase med femtitusen. The question stays FROM. The med string is the filled Case cloth. Relative markedness of the bare double surface against med is not re-elicited here.
• R-inventory. hva … for is the swipe the notes print. It is Consideration. An Amount swipe parallel to German womit, and a card swipe parallel to worauf, are not printed. None is filed. A currency menu is the constructed i hvilken valuta, not a printed Norwegian cell.
• for three ways. On belaste, Consideration. On sikte, Accusation. On live legge skylden på, Charge of that ascription. The letter is shared. The licensers are not.
• Card host. German cloth B can put the card in the accusative. The Norwegian notes print Pat and Chase. No card string is printed, so none is adopted, and no Norwegian charge_ACCOUNT page is opened.
• sell·Navajo stays deferred. No credit-merit-bg.html and no credit-merit-pl.html. No second sense×language page this tick.

Corpus filenames

The Group D charge notes name Norwegian belaste / ta betalt against siktet. They print Belastet de Pat tjue euro? (DOC-looking, still FROM), belaste Chase med femtitusen (cloth B), and hva … for (Consideration). They do not print a filled ta betalt frame and they do not print a filled siktet string. The printed denomination rows, the two German Case cloths, and the numbered German NegQ strings stay on charge-fee-de.html. Dutch waarvoor stays on charge-fee-nl.html. Norwegian questions on this page that are not the printed swipe are constructed parallels to the German cells, plus the ordinary V2 and ikke-after-finite shape already used on the live Norwegian pages. The lexical entry’s Group D paragraph is the same source the German page cites. DOCX originals under the Tritransitive lit tree. Index 2 Payment remains betale, overføre. Nothing on this page is presented as field elicitation.