charge_FEE · in rekening brengen

Hierarchy

Same inventory as English charge_FEE and the live German twin. Not four-place. Surface count can name a workshop, a payer, twenty, euros, and a meal. The lexicon does not list four co-arguments of √CHARGE_FEE. Group D does not add a fourth argument. Dutch adds V2, an R-pronoun, and a complex predicate. It does not add a second structural object beside the MeasureP.

The fee is one MeasureP. Amount and Denomination are inner arguments of that object. Composition is V(MeasureP), not V(n)(U). A bare wat answers the whole QP or a fee-type first. Denomination alone is the marked reading, reached by a currency menu. It is not the first answer out of the blue. That three-way split is the denomination note’s general diagnostic. The Dutch questions that illustrate it are constructed.

Geometry is 1+2 with optional outer Consideration: one Initiator, one applied Source, one measuring object. Shared letters with betalen are not Appl_HAVE. V2 is a T-copy. waarvoor resumes voor. It does not resume euro minus twintig, and it does not resume the in inside in rekening.

Working hierarchy: Chargor > Payer/Source_{Case open} > MeasureP ⟨n,U⟩ (> voor-Consideration). The complex predicate is packaging of that hierarchy. It is not a fourth GF.

Dutch frames · one complex predicate

in rekening brengen is the FEE name the Group D notes print for Dutch. It is not an aspect pair and not a HAVE/FROM pair. The verb is brengen. The participle of that verb is gebracht. The fixed piece stays with it: in rekening gebracht. That is lemma morphology of the complex predicate, the same way de schuld … gegeven is lemma morphology on blame-nl.html and separable bij is lemma morphology of bijschrijven. It is not a Focus particle and not a stranded-particle test. No second FEE verb is printed, so none is filed. aanklagen is the ACCUSE pair, a different root. Do not merge it with the levy. Live blame stays de schuld geven.

1. ✓ twintig euro in rekening brengen citation · complex predicate · MeasureP · Payer unfilled
2. ✓ Ze hebben twintig euro voor het eten in rekening gebracht. constructed · perfect · voor Consideration · in rekening with the participle · Payer unfilled · same meal as the English/German diagnostics, not a Dutch interview
3. ✓ Hebben ze twintig euro niet in rekening gebracht? constructed · niet before the participle · ordinary Dutch Neg shape · no GEN-neg · Payer unfilled
4. ✓ Brengen ze twintig euro in rekening? constructed · V2 · finite brengen · predicate piece final · not a Focus host
5. ✓ Waarvoor brengen ze twintig euro in rekening? constructed spelling · the notes name waarvoor as Consideration · not the unit · not in rekening
6. ✓ Heeft de parkeerautomaat twintig euro in rekening gebracht? constructed Voice pair · institutional Initiator · parallel to German Parkautomat · Payer unfilled · not a printed Dutch cell
7. * Heeft het weer twintig euro in rekening gebracht? constructed Voice filter · weather fails Chargor · Payer unfilled

MeasureP WH / NegQ · denomination, waarvoor, LBC

WH forces Amount ≠ Denomination inside one MeasureP. Verbal WH sees that object. waarvoor follows the Consideration P. It does not follow a fixed theta name, and it does not follow the predicate-internal in. niet does not rewrite the QP into a genitive. That rewrite is Polish, live at charge-fee-pl.html. There is no unique preverbal Focus host, so these questions are not Hungarian particle-separation. The printed Group D denomination cells are German. The Dutch lines are the same diagnostic in Dutch forms. They are constructed, except the waarvoor resumption, which the notes name.

1. ✓ Wat brengen ze in rekening? constructed · parallel to printed Was berechnen Sie? · QP or fee-type first · U marked · not a printed Dutch cell
2. ✓ In welke valuta brengen ze in rekening? constructed currency menu · λU · this in is the currency PP · it does not resume in rekening
3. ✓ Wat brengen ze voor een bitcoin in rekening? constructed · parallel to printed Was berechnen Sie für ein Bitcoin? · QP of the fee first · Consideration stays voor
4. ✓ Waarvoor hebben ze twintig euro niet in rekening gebracht? constructed · waarvoor = the named Consideration resumption · not the unit · niet before the participle
5. ✓ Hoeveel euro brengen ze in rekening? constructed · whole MeasureP · unit inside the WH
6. ✓ Hoeveel brengen ze in rekening? constructed · degree WH · U bound
7. * Wat twintig brengen ze in rekening? LBC · parallel to printed Was zwanzig berechnen Sie? · underivable
8. * Wat twintig hebben ze niet in rekening gebracht? same LBC under niet · constructed
9. * Waarvoor twintig hebben ze niet in rekening gebracht? unit cannot ride out of Consideration voor · parallel to Für was zwanzig
10. * Hoeveel brengen ze euro in rekening? degree out, unit stranded · same LBC as Hoeveel heeft de raad ETH
11. * Waar hebben ze voor twintig in rekening gebracht? waarvoor does not decompose onto a unit remnant · parallel to Wo … für zwanzig
12. * Waarin brengen ze twintig euro rekening? waarin does not peel in out of the predicate · in rekening is not a free P

A packaging bracket for the perfect, Payer unfilled, is [CP hebben_T [TP ze₁ [T' t_T [VoiceP t₁ [ApplP Payer_open [VP [MeasureP twintig euro] [voor het eten] in rekening gebracht]]]]]]. Chains are {ze₁, t₁} INIT and {hebben_T, t_T} V2. in rekening is not a chain. These brackets are a packaging hypothesis aligned with the German V2 traces. They are not an interview. Superiority and multiple WH are not given a Dutch paradigm here, and they are not Hungarian Focus uniqueness.

GEN-neg · N/A

Dutch has no genitive of negation. niet does not rewrite the MeasureP, and it does not rewrite an unfilled Payer, into a genitive. The live Dutch pages already say this: blame-nl.html keeps the accusative on de schuld under niet, and credit-fin-nl.html keeps the measuring object under niet with no genitive spell-out. This page uses the same fact on the levy. No Dutch genitive string is printed, so none is starred as if elicited.

The host of a genitive rewrite of the measuring QP is Polish, live at obciążyć / naliczyć (tej kwoty, trzech tokenów). Live Hungarian felszámol keeps the fee accusative under nem and separates fel-. Live German berechnen leaves the accusative MeasureP accusative under nicht. Those facts stay on those pages. Dutch does not import the genitive and does not import the particle.

1. ✓ Hebben ze twintig euro niet in rekening gebracht? MeasureP stays · niet before the participle · no case rewrite
2. ✓ FIN parallel, not this root: Heeft de raad elke rekening 0,3 ETH niet bijgeschreven? printed shape on credit-fin-nl.html · no GEN-neg there either
3. ✓ blame parallel, not this root: Hebben ze de aannemer de schuld van de vertraging niet gegeven? accusative stays the noun · blame-nl.html
4. ✓ PL parallel, the cut this page does not copy: Rada nie obciążyła tej kwoty. GEN-neg on the measuring QP · charge-fee-pl.html
5. * A genitive rewrite of the QP under niet. N/A · that host is Polish · no Dutch genitive string is printed

Geometry · charge_FEE beside the live Dutch roots

In the FEE geometry the Payer is the person the money comes FROM. e2 is debit / OWE of ⟨n,U⟩ on that Payer. A later payment does not have to be true for the levy to be true. Shared surface letters with pay do not flip FROM into HAVE. The Case letter of the Dutch Payer stays open, so this page does not treat an IO or a bare object as a HAVE shell.

• betalen / overmaken / pay_GIVE. Index 2 Payment cites betalen, overmaken. Payment-true is that later event, not e2 of in rekening brengen. No filled payment-versus-levy pair is printed in the Dutch FEE notes, so none is filed as an elicited contrast. The direction is the shared FROM dual.
• sell. Price is a MeasureP of a HAVE-goods root. On a charge, voor hosts Consideration, and waarvoor resumes it. Shared waarvoor would be Price of sell and Consideration of charge. It does not give one shell. No Dutch sell micro-entry is opened here. sell·Navajo stays deferred.
• deduct. Shared FROM + MeasureP. English deduct keeps Domain as a from-PP. The live Dutch ledger page already rejects van on an account as the TO cloth of bijschrijven and points that van at decrement. That is not evidence for a Dutch deduct lemma, and it is not this levy. No Dutch deduct page this tick.
• aanklagen / charge_ACCUSE. Judge > Target > Accusation. Different root. No selected MeasureP. The notes name the pair and do not print a worked aanklagen string, so none is added. See charge-accuse.html.
• de schuld geven. Live at blame-nl.html. Index 2 Attitude. The accusative is the light noun, not the person. Charge is van, resumed by waarvan. On this page waarvoor resumes FEE Consideration. Same R-pronoun family, different licenser. Guilt-true is that root’s business, not e2 of the levy. toeschrijven stays live ATT and MERIT, not the blame lemma and not this lemma.
• charge_ACCOUNT. A to-card destination is book-entry. This plate does not give it a Dutch lemma. in rekening is the predicate piece, not that destination. Keep the sister on charge-account.html.
• bijschrijven / crediteren / credit_FIN. Live at credit-fin-nl.html. TO ledger increment. The printed strings are een bedrag bijschrijven op een rekening and De raad heeft elke rekening 0,3 ETH gecrediteerd. HAS_ON_BOOKS is that page’s e2. Opposite polarity from FROM. The noun rekening on that page is the Account. The same noun inside in rekening brengen is part of the levy predicate. The shared noun does not make the roots one lemma.
• toeschrijven / credit_MERIT and attribute_ATT. Live at credit-merit-nl.html and attribute-att-nl.html. Content ascription: IO or aan-Target + accusative Charge. No MeasureP. No Appl_FROM of money. An IO on those pages is the ascribee. An IO, if Dutch FEE ever ranks one, would be the Payer. That ranking is not printed, so it is not filed.
• Hungarian Focus and Polish GEN-neg. Live felszámol separates fel- under one preverbal host. Live obciążyć / naliczyć rewrites the measuring QP under nie. Dutch niet leaves the MeasureP and leaves in rekening as the predicate piece. Do not import the particle. Do not import the genitive rewrite.
• laten. Outer CAUSE is two Voice domains on the live Dutch blame and FIN pages. No filled FEE causative is printed in the Dutch notes, so none is filed. Consideration stays voor and does not become a further object of √CHARGE_FEE. That is not a fourth argument.
• Debit-true is e2. Goods-HAVE is sell’s e2. HAS_ON_BOOKS is bijschrijven / crediteren’s e2. Guilt is aanklagen’s and de schuld geven’s business. Payment-true is betalen / overmaken. None of those is e2 of in rekening brengen.

Passives are a Voice test and not a new argument. No Dutch passive paradigm for this predicate is printed, so none is filed, and which dependent would promote is not ranked. The German passives cut’s map stays on charge-fee-de.html. It is not copied here as an elicited worden-paradigm.

Shells, ApplP, and Case

1. M1√CHARGE_FEE merges with MeasureP ⟨Amount, Denom⟩
2. M2Appl_FROM merges Payer · Case letter open
3. M3Voice merges Chargor · in rekening is the predicate piece
4. A4v ↔ MeasureP · niet does not write a genitive
5. V5V2 · {hebben_T, t_T} · not a theta chain
6. V6WH or waarvoor fronts · unit stays inside MeasureP
7. F7Voice filter · weather ≠ Chargor
8. G8Gold · debit / OWE ≠ betalen · LBC holds · no fourth argument · GEN-neg N/A

[CP hebben_T [TP ze_1 [T' t_T [VoiceP t_1
  [ApplP Payer_open
    [VP [MP twintig euro]
        [voor het eten]
        in rekening gebracht]]]]]]
{ze_1, t_1} INIT · {hebben_T, t_T} V2
in rekening is the predicate piece, not a chain
Payer Case is not copied

[CP waarvoor_3 [C' brengen_T [TP ze_1 [T' t_T
  [VoiceP t_1 [ApplP Payer_open
    [VP [MP twintig euro] [PP t_3] in rekening]]]]]]]
waarvoor resumes voor · it does not resume in rekening
it does not resume euro minus twintig

λn ∃e ∃x ∃U [ CHARGE(e) ∧ INIT(e, xChargor) ∧ FROM(e, xPayer)
  ∧ TH(e, ⟨n, U⟩) ∧ CONSID(e, z) ]

Voice introduces Chargor. Appl_FROM introduces Payer. MeasureP sits as Incremental Theme of the debit. Consideration attaches under voor. There is no Recipient HAVE shell, no Hungarian verb-modifier slot, and no English double object of two bare Themes. Putting HAVE, a stranded unit, or a third object of Consideration into the complex predicate is how a four-place accident gets written.

Proto-roles are shell-local. Chargor is a partial Proto-Agent (workshop, bank, meter, script). Payer is Proto-Source, not Proto-Recipient. MeasureP is Incremental Theme of the debit. Denomination is not a further theta role. An R-pronoun is not a theta role. in rekening is not a theta role.

Underivables (Dutch)

1. * Wat twintig brengen ze in rekening? LBC · parallel to the printed German cell · underivable
2. * Waarvoor twintig hebben ze niet in rekening gebracht? unit out of Consideration voor · constructed
3. * Hoeveel brengen ze euro in rekening? unit stranded next to the predicate · constructed
4. * Waar hebben ze voor twintig in rekening gebracht? waarvoor does not split onto euro minus twintig · constructed
5. * Waarin brengen ze twintig euro rekening? predicate-internal in is not a free P · constructed
6. * Heeft het weer twintig euro in rekening gebracht? Voice filter · constructed
7. * A fee MeasureP on aanklagen, or an accusation on in rekening brengen. different roots · no filled Dutch string is printed, so none is starred as if elicited
8. * A genitive rewrite of the QP under niet. N/A · host is Polish obciążyć / naliczyć
9. * A unique Focus host, or in rekening separated under niet. Hungarian felszámol · not this page
10. * First-out-of-the-blue U as the default of bare wat. denomination note · marked U · currency menu is the direct question
11. * Payer + MeasureP as two bare Themes, or a ranked dative Payer copied from German cloth A. Case letter unprinted · German DAT/ACC split stays on charge-fee-de.html
12. * German cloth B (belasten + mit) as a Dutch second cloth. no Dutch companion verb is printed
13. * Payment entailed by the levy. e2 is debit / OWE · betalen / overmaken are later
14. * Ledger bijschrijven / crediteren, or ATT/MERIT toeschrijven, as this MeasureP. live on their own pages · rekening there is Account

Group D packaging · Dutch FEE continues the set

Group D (German, Dutch, Norwegian) is the V2 / R-pronoun set already named on charge_FEE · English. Same hierarchy as the English levy. Group C is closed: Hungarian felszámol (Focus and fel-), Bulgarian таксувам (WH clusters; за Consideration), Polish obciążyć / naliczyć (genitive of negation on the measuring QP). German berechnen / belasten opened Group D with two Case cloths. This page is Dutch FEE only, and it continues Group D FEE. The Dutch cloth is the complex predicate, not a copy of German cloth B and not a filled German in Rechnung stellen string. Norwegian belaste is live and closes Group D FEE. aanklagen stays on charge_ACCUSE. Live de schuld geven stays on blame-nl.html.

Against German cloth A, Dutch does not rank the Payer as dative. Against German cloth B, Dutch does not file a mit-Amount. What sits in C is V2 hebben or finite brengen, not a Romance finite-verb copy and not a Hungarian Focus host. waarvoor extracts voor. It does not extract the denomination and it does not extract rekening.

Open items

• Payer Case. Appl_FROM is adopted. Dative versus accusative versus a bij-phrase is not printed. None is ranked. German cloth A’s dative stays on the German page.
• Companion FEE verb. None is named. aanklagen is the ACCUSE pair, not a second levy root. No scout verb is added beyond that name.
• waarin versus a currency in. waarvoor is the R-pronoun the notes use. waarin is not filed as a resumer of in rekening. A currency menu is the constructed in welke valuta, not a printed Dutch cell.
• Dutch passive paradigm. Unprinted. Promotion is not ranked. No worden or krijgen string is invented for this predicate.
• laten. Two Voice domains are the wrap already on the live Dutch pages. No filled FEE causative is printed, so none is adopted. Consideration still does not join the inner objects as a further argument of the levy.
• Norwegian FEE. Live at belaste. Cloth B is ACC Payer + med-Amount. ta betalt stays an unfilled companion. Closes Group D. Not reopened here.
• sell·Navajo stays deferred. No credit-merit-bg.html and no credit-merit-pl.html.

Corpus filenames

The Group D charge notes name Dutch in rekening brengen against aanklagen. They name waarvoor as the Consideration resumption. The printed denomination rows, the two German Case cloths, and the numbered German NegQ strings stay on charge-fee-de.html. Dutch questions on this page are constructed parallels to those cells, plus the ordinary V2 and niet-before-participle shape already used on the live Dutch pages. The lexical entry’s Group D paragraph is the same source the German page cites. DOCX originals under the Tritransitive lit tree. Index 2 Payment remains betalen, overmaken. Nothing on this page is presented as field elicitation. No companion FEE verb was printed, so none was scouted.