Working paper. French-only micro-entry from Tritransitive NegQ Group B Romance (Negative_Questions_Sell_GroupB_Romance), sharing geometry with Lexical_Entry_Sell_Argument_Structure and the English / Spanish sell micro-entries. Constructed diagnostics diagnose Case, clitics, and MeasureP; they are not spontaneous-speech citations. Italian vendere in the same DOCX is pointed only — this tick does not deepen it.
Constructed examples. Frames below are packaging hypotheses aligned with Volume 5 and the Romance Transfer supplement. Payment-true is implicated, not entailed — same moral as English sell and as earmark not entailing spending. Do not fake elicitation.
Class table. Index 2 does not list sell. Like chargeFEE, this root sits Beyond Index 2 with measuring companions. French Index 2 Transfer cites échanger, donner — not vendre. Neighbouring Index 2 classes (Transfer, Payment) are not a translation of sell.
Scout / deferred. Italian vendere shares the Group B DOCX but is not a micro-entry this tick. Spanish Group B twin is live at sell-es.html; Japanese and Mandarin Group A at sell-ja.html and sell-zh.html; Navajo remains deferred. No fake elicitation.

Hierarchy

Same inventory as English sell. Not five-place. Not four sisters of one V. Surface count can name Pat, Chris, a lawnmower, and a price, but the lexicon does not list four co-arguments of √SELL / √VEND-.

Intended labeling (shared with English / Spanish)

√SELL + ApplHAVE(Recipient, Themegoods) + pour-selected MeasurePPrice ⟨Amount, Denomination⟩

Voice introduces Agent. Low ApplHAVE introduces Recipient and relates Recipient to Theme. √SELL / proc takes Theme (goods) as Incremental Theme of eHAVE. French spells Recipient as DAT (lui / à + NP), not as a second ACC. pour selects one MeasureP whose inner arguments are Amount (degree) and Denomination (unit). Optional high Appl / Loc introduces Platform (y / sur) or affectee — not a sixth inner argument and not the denomination. Optional pour + INF is Type B Purpose stacked outside Price — same letter as Price; complement type (QP vs INF) and follow-up disambiguate.

$20 = vingt dollars = one MeasureP. Orthography is not extra arity. There is no sixth argument “currency symbol.” See English sell · Hierarchy for the shared arithmetic.

What Group B changes is Case, clitics, and which letter does two jobs. What it does not change is the inventory. Twenty is still not dollars. Dollars is still not a sister of vendre. Payment-settled is still implicated, not e2. HAVE of the goods is still e2.

French frames · Case clothes

No English DOC / to-frame ACC flip. Theme stays ACC. Recipient is DAT (lui doubling à-PP). Price stays inside pour. Cheapness under Neg therefore tracks the goods, not an applied ACC Recipient. There is no Chris was sold a lawnmower twin. Participle agreement (vendue) tracks ACC Theme, not Price.

  1. ✓ Pat a vendu une tondeuse à Chris.
  2. ✓ Pat a vendu une tondeuse à Chris pour vingt dollars.
  3. ✓ Pat a vendu une tondeuse pour vingt dollars. Recipient omitted; pour-PP may reread as Theme₂ of exchange — still one MeasureP
  4. ✓ Pat a vendu une tondeuse. Recipient and Price independently omissible
  5. ✓ Pat n’a-t-il pas vendu une tondeuse à Chris pour vingt dollars ? canonical NegQ
  6. ✓ Ne lui a-t-il pas vendu une tondeuse pour vingt dollars ? lui = Recipient
  7. ✓ Ne lui en a-t-il pas vendu une pour vingt dollars ? en = quantified Theme QP
  8. ✓ La tondeuse ne lui a-t-elle pas été vendue pour vingt dollars ? passive promotes Theme; agreement tracks ACC
  9. * Chris n’a-t-il pas été vendu une tondeuse pour vingt dollars ? no DOC-passive twin
  10. * Ne lui a-t-il pas vendu vingt dollars une tondeuse ? DAT / ACC cannot absorb Price as object

NegQ baseline (French map)

✓ Pat n’a-t-il pas vendu une tondeuse à Chris pour vingt dollars ?

✓ Ne la lui a-t-il pas vendue pour vingt dollars ?

✓ Combien de BTC ne lui a-t-il pas vendu pour 8 400 USDT ?

* Chris n’a-t-il pas été vendu une tondeuse pour vingt dollars ?

* Ne lui a-t-il pas vendu vingt dollars une tondeuse ?

A bare Non on the canonical NegQ most readily challenges the event or the goods. Challenging the twenty wants the Price QP already under discussion. That is the opposite of payer, where the money is ACC and is cheap.

MeasureP WH diagnostics

WH forces Amount ≠ Denomination inside one Case object of pour. Verbal WH sees the MeasureP, not unit and degree as two objects of vendre. Same MeasureP pattern as English sell, Spanish vender, and deduct. LBC survives Neg. en resumes one QP (goods); it does not resume dollars minus vingt.

  1. ✓ Pour combien de dollars ne lui a-t-il pas vendu la tondeuse ?
  2. ✓ Pour vingt de quoi ne lui a-t-il pas vendu la tondeuse ?
  3. ✓ En quelle monnaie ne lui a-t-il pas vendu la tondeuse pour vingt ?
  4. ✓ Ne lui en a-t-il pas vendu deux pour vingt dollars ? en = goods QP
  5. * Pour quoi vingt ne lui a-t-il pas vendu la tondeuse ? LBC / sortal mismatch (Price remnant)
  6. * Combien ne lui a-t-il pas vendu la tondeuse dollars ? stranded unit after vendre
  7. * Ne lui en a-t-il pas vendu la tondeuse pour vingt ? en ≠ Price unit
  8. * Il en a vendu la tondeuse pour vingt. en cannot resume dollars minus vingt

Two constraints conspire on the stars: Left Branch Condition (Amount inside MeasureP; French cannot extract the degree and leave the unit stranded under pour), and sortal mismatch under bare quoi (quoi wants an N or whole DP; vingt is a numeral, not a denomination). Combien de dollars pied-pipes. Rescues are pour vingt de quoi and en quelle monnaie — the Group B spelling of English twenty of what / in what currency. The rescue does not make dollars a sister of vendu.

pour overload (French cannot write Spanish’s por / para split)

pour vingt dollars = Price (QP complement). pour vider l’abri / pour lever des fonds = Purpose (INF / clause). English stacked for twenty dollars to clear the shed; Spanish writes the stack without reusing one P: por veinte dólares para vaciar el cobertizo. French must disambiguate inside one pour by complement type and follow-up — packaging, not a second root. Association site E (Purpose) is therefore a complement-type reading of pour, not a different letter.

Platform vs Price

✓ N’y a-t-il pas vendu la tondeuse pour vingt dollars ? y = venue / sur Uniswap

* N’y a-t-il pas vendu la tondeuse vingt dollars ? y does not become Price

Geometry · vendre ≠ échanger ≠ payer

In Pat a vendu une tondeuse à Chris, Chris comes to HAVE the lawnmower. That is give-geometry. DAT Recipient is the spell-out of low ApplHAVE — the HAVE diagnostic that SWAP lacks.

When Recipient is dropped (Pat a vendu une tondeuse pour vingt dollars), the pour-PP can be reread as incoming Incremental Theme of an exchange. That rereading changes the Appl head (HAVE vs SWAP); it does not split vingt from dollars or add a verbal sister for the unit.

Shells, ApplP, and Case

Base tree (asymmetric sale · French cloth)

VoiceP  [ Pat
  vP / initP
    ApplP_LOW  [ ChrisDAT   [ Appl_HAVE
      VP  [ √VEND-   [ Theme  une tondeuseACC ] ] ] ]
    PP_pour  [ pour  [ MeasureP  [ Amount vingt ] [ N dollars ] ] ] ]

French vendre never assigns four structural Cases. Theme is ACC; Recipient is DAT; Price is inside P. The English DOC applied-object slot has no twin — that is why *Chris n’a-t-il pas été vendu une tondeuse ? stays bad and why cheapness under Neg tracks the goods. Participle agreement (vendue) tracks that ACC.

Amount is not an Incremental Theme of sell on the give-reading. The lawnmower is. Twenty dollars can measure the sale as a scale without being the object that is incrementally transferred. On a SWAP rereading, the MeasureP becomes the incoming Incremental Theme — still one Theme, still internally Amount + Unit.

Optional high Appl DAT (ethical / affectee) is a different dative from Recipient. Volume 5 splits three datives: Recipient of eHAVE, high Affectee of the event, FI causee of outer CAUSE. NegQ does not turn the Affectee into a fourth argument of √VEND-. Type A faire climbing unions Voice domains; lui under faire vendre is Causee or Recipient until à Chris is written; Price stays outside the DAT cluster and never climbs as a dative. Purpose pour + INF never climbs either.

Omission does not demote Price to a pure adjunct. High and selected P-layers are optional in the numeration; they are still arguments when present. The diagnostic is participanthood under Case, binding, and WH — not omitability.

Outer CAUSE · three-way DAT (corpus)

✓ Ne lui a-t-il pas fait vendre la tondeuse à Chris pour vingt dollars ? FI; lui ambiguous until à Chris

✓ Ne la lui a-t-il pas fait vendre pour vingt dollars ? climbing ACC; Price still PP

* Ne lui en a-t-il pas fait vendre pour vingt ? en still ≠ Price unit

Underivables (French)

  1. * Chris n’a-t-il pas été vendu une tondeuse ? no DOC-passive twin
  2. * Ne lui a-t-il pas vendu vingt dollars une tondeuse ? Price ≠ DAT / ACC object
  3. * Pour quoi vingt ne lui a-t-il pas vendu la tondeuse ? Amount ≠ denomination N under pour
  4. * Combien ne lui a-t-il pas vendu la tondeuse dollars ? LBC stranded unit
  5. * Il en a vendu la tondeuse pour vingt. en ≠ Price unit remnant
  6. * Ne lui a-t-il pas vendu 8 400 USDT à Kim pour 0,2 BTC ? no SWAP inversion (unless goods really are USDT)
  7. * N’y a-t-il pas vendu la tondeuse vingt dollars ? y ≠ Price

Group B packaging · this tick French only

Group B (Spanish, French, Italian) is the Romance Case-cloth contrast set already used for NegQ on sell. Same hierarchy as English; different host of Amount+Denomination and cloth of Recipient (DAT / à-PP, not DOC ACC). French’s distinctive Group B fact vs Spanish: pour overloads Price and Purpose; Spanish splits them as por / para. This tick is French only. Italian vendere shares the DOCX and may be briefly pointed; full sense×language page for Italian is a later queue tick. Spanish Group B is at sell-es.html; Group A Japanese at sell-ja.html; Mandarin at sell-zh.html; Navajo stays deferred.

Open items

Corpus filenames

Primary extract for this micro-entry is Group B Romance NegQ on sell (§3.2 French frames, §6 LBC, §7 pour overload, §11 faire DAT split). Geometry is shared with the English lexical entry and the Spanish micro-entry. Chat packaging summary: Tritransitive NegQ Turn 3. Text extract used this tick under /tmp/sell-fr-extracts/.

Series placement: French sense×language twin of English sell and Spanish vender. Feeds WH-Raising of Denominations and Pied-Piping MeasureP under Group B cloth, with the pour overload as the French-specific packaging fact. Does not reopen Type A / Type B causation-chain papers. Does not invent IT/JP elicitation.