credit_FIN · godskrive

Hierarchy

Same inventory as English credit_FIN, German credit_FIN, and Dutch credit_FIN. Not five-place. Not four sisters of one V. Surface count can name the board, 0,3, ETH, the account, and a Q3 threshold — but Amount and Denomination share one MeasureP, Account is one Recipient / Domain-of-increment, and Reason is high / outer.

0,3 ETH = one MeasureP. Orthography is not extra arity (Norwegian decimal comma, same as the string already on the MERIT and ATT pages). Amount and Denomination are both inner arguments of that object. Composition is V(MeasureP), not V(n)(U). Hom(e, ⟨n,U⟩): the increment is measured by degree n on scale U.

Working hierarchy: Allocator > MeasureP ⟨Amount, Denomination⟩ > Recipient / Account > Reason. Case ranking on godskrive is Allocator > MeasureP (ACC) > Account (på+Account). Weather still fails Allocator. Payout is still not entailed. HAS_ON_BOOKS ≠ payout.

Norwegian frames · Case clothes

One lemma, not two roots. godskrive takes accusative MeasureP and Account under på. That is the string already printed on credit-merit-no.html and attribute-att-no.html. DAT is mostly gone: there is no productive dative Account of the German jedem Konto type, and there is no bare IO Account of the Dutch elke rekening 0,3 ETH bijschrijven type for få to promote. The live MERIT and ATT pages already mark få out for that reason. på is the productive Account wrapper. til is MERIT/ATT’s Target preposition and the allative of Index 2 overføre; a bare til-Account is not filed. No double accusative of MeasureP + Account. Do not conflate FIN’s på-Account with blame’s på-Target on legge skylden på, and do not conflate it with MERIT’s til-Target — same preposition letters can show up elsewhere, different packaging, different object.

1. ✓ Styret har godskrevet 0,3 ETH på kontoen. printed på+Account cloth · already on MERIT/ATT · ACC MeasureP
2. ✓ godskrive et beløp på en konto infinitive of the printed cloth · constructed
3. ✓ Styret har godskrevet 0,3 ETH på hver konto. på+Account · distributive · constructed
4. ✓ Styret godskriver 0,3 ETH på hver konto. present · god- stays on the stem
5. ✓ I går godskrev styret 0,3 ETH på kontoen. V2 · whole finite verb · bound prefix
6. ✓ På kontoen godskrev styret 0,3 ETH. V2 · på-PP fronted · not a second cloth
7. ✓ Banken har godskrevet 0,3 ETH på kontoen. Allocator = institution
8. ✓ Oppgjørssentralen har godskrevet 0,3 ETH på hver konto. Allocator = institution
9. ✓ Den smarte kontrakten har godskrevet 0,3 ETH på hver konto. Allocator = code · constructed
10. ✓ Styret har godskrevet 0,3 ETH på hver konto grunnet terskelen i tredje kvartal. outer Reason · grunnet · not a second Account
11. ✓ Man har godskrevet 0,3 ETH på hver konto. man demotion · MeasureP stays ACC
12. ✓ 0,3 ETH ble godskrevet på kontoen. bli promotes MeasureP · Account stays in på
13. ✓ På kontoen ble 0,3 ETH godskrevet. PP fronted · subject is still the MeasureP
14. ✓ 0,3 ETH godskrives på kontoen. s-passive · same promotion · not a second cloth
15. ✓ MERIT contrast: Investorene har tilskrevet æren til entreprenøren. MERIT · til-Target + ACC Charge · credit-merit-no.html
16. ✓ ATT contrast: Rådet tilskrev den tidlige ferdigstillelsen til entreprenøren. ATT · same letters · attribute-att-no.html
17. ✓ blame contrast: Komiteen la skylden for forsinkelsen på entreprenøren. blame · på = Target · blame-no.html
18. * Kontoen ble 0,3 ETH godskrevet. bli does not promote the på-Account · not a second accusative Theme
19. * Kontoen fikk 0,3 ETH godskrevet. få out · no dative IO left to promote
20. * Styret har godskrevet kontoen 0,3 ETH. no DOC of MeasureP + Account as two bare ACC Themes · DAT mostly gone
21. * Styret har godskrevet 0,3 ETH og kontoen. no coordination of two bare Themes
22. * Styret har godskrevet 0,3 ETH til kontoen. bare til-Account not filed · that PP is overføre and MERIT Target
23. * Styret har godskrevet kontoen med 0,3 ETH. med-amount not filed · MeasureP stays the accusative
24. * I går skrev styret 0,3 ETH på kontoen god. no stranded god · unlike DE gut / NL bij
25. * I går skrev styret 0,3 ETH gods på kontoen. no gods particle · gods is not a morpheme of this lemma
26. * Det dårlige været har godskrevet 0,3 ETH på kontoen. weather ≠ Allocator
27. * Styret har godskrevet 0,3 ETH fra kontoen. fra Account = deduct / trekke fra, not TO

MeasureP WH / NegQ · LBC and på

Unlike credit_MERIT and attribute_ATT, credit_FIN has a verbal MeasureP. Amount and Denomination compose one measure object. Whole-QP pied-piping is free under Neg. Amount-only is free when the unit is bound. Left-branch extraction of Amount leaving the unit next to the verb is still out — same LBC record as deduct / sell / charge_FEE / English, German, and Dutch credit_FIN. på takes the whole Account DP. It does not split the MeasureP. Norwegian has no Romance en and no genitive of negation on this root. Bound god- never leaves the stem; that is lemma morphology, not a WH diagnostic. Stranding the preposition på (hvilken konto … på) is ordinary Norwegian PP-stranding. It is not a verb particle, and it is not the German gut / Dutch bij strand.

1. ✓ Hvor mye ETH har styret godskrevet på kontoen? whole MeasureP
2. ✓ Hvor mye har styret godskrevet på kontoen? degree WH · U bound
3. ✓ På hvilken konto har styret godskrevet 0,3 ETH? på-Account WH · pied-piping
4. ✓ Hvilken konto har styret godskrevet 0,3 ETH på? PP-stranding of på · not a verb particle · constructed
5. ✓ Hvem har godskrevet hvor mye ETH på hvilken konto? Alloc > MeasureP > på-Account
6. ✓ Hva har styret godskrevet på kontoen? whole MeasureP as hva
7. * Hvor mye har styret ETH godskrevet på kontoen? LBC · U stranded
8. * Hva har styret 0,3 godskrevet på kontoen? what hijacks object · stranded n
9. * På hva har styret godskrevet 0,3 ETH konto? Account noun stranded outside på
10. ✓ MERIT pointer: Hva har de tilskrevet til entreprenøren? WH = Charge · not MeasureP · tilskrive
11. * Hvor mye ETH har de tilskrevet til entreprenøren? unless Charge recoded as a share

Superiority ranks Allocator > MeasureP > på-Account > outer Reason. Amount and Denomination never compete as two verbal WH-items. Cheap NegQ association tracks the MeasureP. Challenging the Account wants that book already under discussion.

Geometry · credit_FIN ≠ credit_MERIT ≠ attribute_ATT ≠ deduct ≠ payer ≠ blame

In Styret har godskrevet 0,3 ETH på kontoen, the board writes 0,3 ETH onto the account’s book. That is ledger INCREMENT, not ascription and not HAVE of goods. The account is Account. 0,3 ETH is MeasureP. HAS_ON_BOOKS holds after the event; spendability / payout is not entailed.

• ≠ credit_MERIT / tilskrive + æren / fortjeneste. Group D names the packaging. MERIT ascribes Charge to a Target (har tilskrevet æren til entreprenøren): til-Target + accusative Charge, no MeasureP, no Account. FIN has MeasureP and Account and the lemma godskrive. Collapsing them because both can be called credit is the error the lexical entry was written to block. Live twin: credit-merit-no.html.
• ≠ attribute_ATT / bare tilskrive. ATT is content-ascribe on the same letters as MERIT: til-Target + accusative Charge, polarity open, light-noun tilskrivning / attribusjon (not æren / fortjeneste) when a noun is used. ATT has no MeasureP and no Account. Live twin: attribute-att-no.html.
• ≠ blame / legge skylden på. Blame ascribes fault. Its accusative is the light noun skylden, and the person is på. FIN’s accusative is MeasureP; FIN’s på is the account. Same preposition letter, different lemma. Blame stays on legge skylden på.
• ≠ deduct. Shared MeasureP. Opposite polarity: deduct = FROM_SET decrement; credit_FIN = TO_SET increment. Norwegian fra on the account yields trekke fra / deduct, not TO (*har godskrevet 0,3 ETH fra kontoen). Live twin: deduct.html. No Norwegian deduct page this tick.
• ≠ betale / overføre / pay_GIVE. Index 2 Payment cites those two verbs. Pay writes MeasureP with Recipient HAVE. FIN’s HAS_ON_BOOKS is weaker; payout is a later verb (trekke / utbetale / overføre). overføre til can cause a credit onto another account; that does not make overføre this root, and it does not make til the filed Account cloth of godskrive.
• ≠ attribute_XFER. Shared CREDIT_LEDGER family. Norwegian ledger packaging for this tick is godskrive, not a second XFER page. XFER stays at attribute-xfer.html.
• ≠ sell / SWAP. Sell: Recipient HAS goods; Price stays inside a price PP. This cloth is not SWAP. Earmark’s Purpose ≠ FIN’s outer grunnet.
• ≠ separable gut / bij. German strands gut (schreibt … gut) and Dutch strands bij (schrijft … bij) as lemma morphology of those verbs. Norwegian god- does not strand. Do not import that diagnostic.
• Missing defaults. Payout and spendability are not entailed. A later debit can reverse the book without making the original credit event false. HAS_ON_BOOKS ≠ physical HAVE ≠ RESTRICTED_FOR.
• Hybrid trap (§5.4). har tilskrevet 30 % av besparelsene til entreprenøren can look MeasureP-shaped and still be MERIT or ATT (quantified Charge on tilskrive). Diagnostics: replaceable by ascribe (tilskrive); not by deposit (godskrive); weather can sit as MERIT/ATT Target and cannot sit as FIN Allocator. MERIT stays on tilskrive.

Shells, ApplP, and Case

VoiceP  [ Allocator = styret
  (ReasonP)  [ grunnet terskelen ]   // optional, outer
  ApplP_TO / book-Rec  [ på [ kontoen ]
    VP  [ √CREDIT_LEDGER   [ MeasureP  [ Amount 0,3 ] [ N ETH ] ] ] ]
]

VoiceP  [ Allocator = styret
  ApplP_TO / book-Rec  [ på [ hver konto ]
    VP  [ √CREDIT_LEDGER   [ MeasureP ⟨0,3, ETH⟩ ] ] ]
]
— MeasureP stays ACC; Account wears wrapper-K på
— no second structural accusative
— no dative IO for få to promote

godskrive assigns one structural accusative: the MeasureP. The Account wears på. There is no frame in which MeasureP and Account are both bare accusative Themes. Composition of the på-frame is V(DP), not V(på(DP)) — same wrapper-K point as the attribute entry (§6.4). Norwegian på has no accusative/dative case split; do not import the German auf dem Konto locative reject as a Norwegian case fact. No low Appl_HAVE of goods. No low Appl_SWAP. No √ASCRIBE. High Appl / Affectee / outer Reason is extra when present.

Bound god- is the lemma’s prefix (godskriver, godskrev, godskrevet, å godskrive). German infix gutzuschreiben and Dutch bij te schrijven do not transfer: Norwegian does not split the prefix around å. The sequence gods inside godskrive and godskrevet is god plus stem-initial s. It is not evidence for a particle gods-. V2 fronts the whole finite verb (I går godskrev styret …). A stranded skrev … god or skrev … gods is out.

∃e [ INCREMENT(e)
  ∧ INIT(e, styre)
  ∧ DEGREE(e, 0.3) ∧ UNIT(e, ETH)
  ∧ TO_SET(e, account) ∧ Hom(e, ⟨0.3, ETH⟩)
  ∧ JUSTIFIED_BY(e, Q3) ]   // Reason optional
result: HAS_ON_BOOKS(account, ⟨0.3, ETH⟩) after e

Underivables (Norwegian FIN)

1. * Det dårlige været har godskrevet 0,3 ETH på kontoen. weather / inanimate as Allocator
2. * Det det dårlige været har gjort, er å godskrive 0,3 ETH på hver konto. do-test · Allocator filter
3. * Hvor mye har styret ETH godskrevet på kontoen? LBC · U stranded
4. * Hva har styret 0,3 godskrevet på kontoen? LBC · stranded n
5. * Styret har godskrevet 0,3 ETH fra kontoen. fra ≠ TO · use trekke fra / deduct
6. * Styret har godskrevet 0,3 ETH på det dårlige været. Account ≠ inanimate cause
7. * Investorene har tilskrevet entreprenøren med 0,3 ETH. MERIT cloth + FIN MeasureP hybrid
8. * Den smarte kontrakten har tilskrevet den tidlige ferdigstillelsen til entreprenøren. system Allocator ≠ MERIT Judge (coerced)
9. * Styret har godskrevet kontoen 0,3 ETH. no DOC of MeasureP + Account as two bare ACC Themes
10. * Styret har godskrevet 0,3 ETH til kontoen. bare til-Account not filed
11. * Kontoen fikk 0,3 ETH godskrevet. få out
12. * I går skrev styret 0,3 ETH på kontoen god. bound god- does not strand
13. ✓ institution / contract as Allocator: Den smarte kontrakten har godskrevet 0,3 ETH på hver konto. book-keeper fine

N/A · not Norwegian FIN diagnostics

Sibling FIN pages omit these where the language does not have them. Norwegian FIN matches that list, with one local cut: bli and få are the promotion pair, and they are filed above. They are not renamed here as German werden or Dutch worden / krijgen.

• Hungarian Focus + nem. N/A. No preverbal Focus host on godskrive.
• Genitive of negation. N/A. Norwegian has no GEN-neg rewrite of the MeasureP or the Account.
• Stranded particle. N/A. god- is a bound prefix (godskriver / godskrev / godskrevet / å godskrive). It does not strand the way German gut strands or Dutch bij strands. There is no gods particle to test. V2 is ordinary clause shape, the same shape the live Norwegian MERIT and ATT pages already use for bound til-. PP-stranding of the preposition på is a different fact and is filed under WH.
• Romance en / ne. N/A. Quantity is the accusative MeasureP, or a degree WH with the unit bound.
• German dative / Dutch krijgen. N/A as Norwegian Case. The dative is mostly gone. få does not revive it. Account stays in the på-PP.

NegQ pointer · association sites

Negative questions on credit_FIN keep the FIN map. They do not invent a fifth theta name and they do not create a Charge. Neg sits high and associates downward. Cheap inner associate = the MeasureP. The på-Account stays the book. Reason stays outer. Payout / spendability is systematically missing as a default Neg target — same moral as bet’s missing settlement. One polar question below is the string already printed as contrast on the live MERIT page.

Open items

• Hungarian FIN. Live at credit-fin-hu.html (jóváír; printed A tanács minden számlának 0,3 ETH-t jóváírt). Focus+nem is on that page, not on Norwegian.
• Bare til-Account. Not filed. The printed goal is på kontoen. til is MERIT/ATT’s Target preposition and the recipient preposition of Index 2 overføre. Speaker check before anyone ranks til as Appl_TO. spec
• med on godskrive. godskrive kontoen med 0,3 ETH would flip the account into a direct object. It is not the printed cloth and it is not ranked as a second geometry. It does not make the amount a second Theme. spec
• Bare NP account. godskrevet kontoen 0,3 ETH is not filed. DAT is mostly gone, and få does not promote that NP. Two bare accusatives would be a DOC this entry refuses. Constructed reject, not elicited. spec
• godskriving / kreditere. Noun and a banker companion. Relative naturalness against primary godskrive is scout-leaning. Not ranked. kreditere is not a second primary lemma on this page.
• Norwegian deduct. FROM dual still English-primary at deduct. trekke fra / fradrag are not this tick.
• Debit as named dual. Does NegQ on a debit verb copy the FIN map with polarity flipped? Prediction: no MERIT debit.
• Hybrid QP Charge (§5.4). Controlled discrimination of quantified Charge on tilskrive vs true FIN MeasureP on godskrive — speaker check recommended in the lexical entry.
• Navajo sell. Still deferred. No new blame language. No credit_MERIT Bulgarian or Polish page.

Corpus filenames

Primary extract for this micro-entry is the FIN half of Lexical_Entry_Credit_Argument_Structure (frames §3.2, Voice §4.1, MeasureP WH §5.2, shells §7.2) plus FIN NegQ association from Negative_Questions_Credit (Group D packaging split: tilskrive vs godskrive). Printed clothes: the contrast string already on the live MERIT and ATT pages. Decrement dual: Lexical_Entry_Deduct_Argument_Structure. Chat packaging: Tritransitive chats 23 (NegQ on credit · two-root · Groups A–D), 25 (credit attitude vs transfer), and 35 (credit argument-structure acceptability), plus Larson shells Group D (Norwegian V2, no stranded particle, bli vs få, tilskrive ≠ godskrive). Index 2 Vol. 7: Norwegian Payment = betale, overføre; Norwegian Attitude = legge skylden på only. No separate FIN lemma in Index 2.