Thief, Victim, Theme · marking by lemma · Hungarian cloth · working claim, revisable
Voice[Thief] + low Appl(Victim) + complement of the root (Theme)
lop / ellop · Theme accusative -t · Wiktionary names a person in the ablative -tól/-től · the purse example of ellop does not fill it
rabol sense 1 · Theme accusative · person ablative -tól/-től · A bankártól egy csomó pénzt raboltak
kilop · Theme accusative · container elative -ból/-ből · a zsebéből · az istállójából
kirabol / meglop · person or place accusative · a Theme beside that object is unprinted in the sense-1 examples
megfoszt · vkit accusative · vmitől ablative · deprive · the served examples are not a purse
A theft, on this reading, has a Thief, a Victim, and a Theme. They are not three equal sisters of one Hungarian verb. Voice adds the Thief. Low Appl introduces the Victim, as a possessor-source inside the verb’s domain: the person who had the thing and no longer has it. That is the same kind of added argument as the dative Victim on stehlen, the indirect Victim on robar, the dative Victim on voler, the у-phrase of украсть, the a-phrase of rubare, the の possessor of 盗む, and the bare dative of kraść. It is a working drawing. It is not a settled analysis. The root’s complement is the Theme, the thing taken.
What Értelmező prints for lop. The header is LOP ige -tam, -ott, -jon. Sense 1 is tárgyas: taking a thing into one’s possession without the owner’s knowledge and consent, secretly and unlawfully. The Theme is accusative: ezüstkanalat, a pénzt, a gyümölcsöt, Fát, pénztárcákat, az áramot, a töltőtollat, lovat, játékot. The place of the act, where a line fills one, is inessive or superessive: Fát lopott az erdőben, pénztárcákat lopott a villamoson, Áruházakban lop. Sense 1.a is tárgy nélkül: Áruházakban lop, Éjjel jár lopni. Sense 1.b, marked ritka, is Vkit lop: taking things bit by bit from someone’s property. The example is Lopta a gazdáját. The person is the accusative. A Theme is absent from that line. Tömörkény’s loptak már játékot a kis unokáknak has a dative, unokáknak, beside the accusative toys. The dative is the people the toys are for. The line does not name a person stolen from.
What is different from the English gloss, and from the Polish dative. English Wiktionary prints the source of steal in from (stolen from the gallery, stolen from us, They stole all my money (from me)). One English preposition covers the person and the place. kraść splits them into a bare dative for the person and z plus genitive for the place. Hungarian does not print that bare dative as the person stolen from. English Wiktionary’s Hungarian entry for lop names the person as “from someone: -tól/-től”, and the example is Másoktól lop ötleteket. The things are ideas. Értelmező sense 5, the plagiarism sense, prints the same pair in the government line Lop vmiből, vkitől (vmit): Ezt a jelenetet Szigligetitől lopta is ablative of a person, and Egész szakaszokat lopott más tudósok műveiből is elative of the works. Sense 5 stays off the purse. Sense 1 of lop does not print -tól/-től.
What Értelmező prints for ellop. The header is ELLOP tárgyas ige. Sense 1 is taking and appropriating a thing that is someone else’s property, unnoticed and secretly. The Theme is accusative: a szemét, az esernyőjét, valamit, mindent, ami lopható. Ellopták az esernyőjét puts the owner in the possessive suffix -jét on the Theme. There is no separate ablative in that line. English Wiktionary names “from someone: -tól/-től” and prints A bűnöző ellopja a pénztárcát. The wallet is accusative. The ablative is named and unfilled. The etymology is el- + lop. The conjugation note says the prefix can split: nem lop el, el is lop. The future cell prints el fog lopni. Értelmező sense 1 already writes the prefix apart from the verb under ne: Mikszáth’s valamit el ne lopjon. Sense 2, using someone else’s idea without naming the source, prints the ablative and the split together: Ezt a gondolatot, ötletet tőlem lopta el. That line is an idea. It is off the purse. The same sense also prints a dative possessor of the Theme: Ellopta vkinek a találmányát. Sense 3 is time, off the purse, and it prints both cases with the prefix after the verb: elloptak tőle két órát, Két órát lopott el ezzel a hivatalos munkaidőből, Móra’s lopok el a munkámtól. Wiktionary labels lop imperfective and ellop perfective. Értelmező does not print those labels. This page quotes Wiktionary’s labels and does not turn them into a telicity claim. Értelmező lists ellop among the igekötős igék of lop.
What rabol and kilop print of the person and the place. Értelmező rabol sense 1 is tárgyas: taking valuables by force or threat, usually more than once, from someone. The government in the wording is vkitől. The examples fill it: Pénzt, ékszereket rabol is accusative Theme, with no person; A bankártól egy csomó pénzt raboltak a banditák is ablative bankártól plus accusative pénzt. That ablative is the theft-sense person-source. Sense 1.b, marked ritka, puts a place in the accusative: A haramiák az elhagyott falvakat rabolják, Jókai’s rabolták a helységet. Sense 2 takes a person or an animal as the Theme, Gyermeket, embereket, leányt, nőket rabol. That is carrying someone off. It stays off the wallet. Sense 3 prints the ablative again, on money got by fraud: vagyonokat raboltak a hiszékeny áldozatoktól. Jókai’s Egy milliót raboltak rajtam is superessive rajtam, on that same sense. kilop sense 1 is taking something out of a place in order to appropriate it. The Theme is accusative and the container is elative: Kilopja a pénzt vkinek a zsebéből, Kilopta a borjút a szomszéd istállójából, Móricz’s a zsebemből kilopni a pénzt. vkinek in vkinek a zsebéből is the possessor of the pocket. The source case on the pocket is the elative. The prefix splits: ezreket loptak ki a dolgozó parasztok zsebéből. A person as the thing taken out, Kilopta a kastélyból a leányt, stays off the purse.
What kirabol and meglop print. Értelmező kirabol sense 1 is robbing someone or something by plunder. The object is accusative, a place or a person: Kiraboltak egy boltot, egy kereskedőt; kirabolták a raktárt, a vagonokat. Arany writes the prefix apart: te raboltad ki Rozgonyi sírboltját. Hunyady’s akit … kirabolt a kaliforniai expresszen has the person as the accusative relative, and the train is superessive, the place of the act. No Theme sits beside those objects. Sense 2’s definition is elvesz vkitől vmit, ablative of a person and accusative of a thing, and the example fills elatives of the body: a munkás testéből az erőt, lelkéből a bizalmat. That sense is figurative. English Wiktionary defines kirabol as loot, plunder, rob, burgle, mug, names kifoszt as a synonym, and prints the split nem rabol ki, ki is rabol, and the future ki fog rabolni. The kifoszt article was not opened. meglop sense 1 is harming someone by theft. The object is an accusative person: Meglopta az apját, Meglopták, amikor aludt, Petőfi’s meglopta az ezerszemű Istent is. No Theme is in those lines. Sense 2 is Meglop vmit: ellop vmiből vmit, and the example is Meglopták a ménest. The herd is accusative.
megfoszt and the companions named beside the articles. Értelmező sense 2 is Megfoszt vkit vmitől: withhold, take, or elrabol from someone what is due to them. The person is accusative. The thing is ablative. The served examples are time, a weapon, joy, a post, a throne, a rank: minden szabad idejétől megfosztotta, Kuncz’s fegyverétől megfosztva, Móricz’s a társasélet örömeitől. English Wiktionary glosses deprive, of something -tól/-től, and prints A tiszteket megfosztották a rangjuktól. The officers are accusative. The rank is ablative. A purse in that slot is unprinted. Sense 1, husking a cob, stays off the frame. The prefix note is nem foszt meg, meg is foszt, future meg fog fosztani. lopkod is its own article. Sense 1 takes small things repeatedly, accusative a gyümölcsöt. Sense 2’s definition says vkitől v. vhonnan, and the examples fill an accusative person or group: Lopkodja az anyját, a szövetkezetet. The ablative and the place are unfilled. ellopkod is named among the derivatives of ellop. That article was not opened. Hungarian Wiktionary’s lop is illegálisan elvesz, megszerez, with no case line. The synonyms it prints, csen, csór, megfúj, happol, have no frame on that page.