earmark · riservare / accantonare / vincolare per

Hierarchy

Same inventory as English earmark. Not three co-arguments of one V predicting a DOC and a transfer. Surface count can name the president, 14M BTC, and new technology — but Purpose is a use-property (type ⟨s,t⟩) via Italian per, not a Goal of motion via a / DAT (allocate) and not a HAVE-Recipient (grant). Writing those three as sisters predicts a Goal DAT promote and a spend entailment. Italian keeps Purpose as per, and it still refuses Goal DAT on this cloth.

14M BTC = one MeasureP. Orthography is not extra arity. Amount and Denomination share one Case object. Composition is V(Resource), not V(n)(U). Hom(m, e): the designation is measured by the quantity. Romance quantity clitic ne resumes the QP — not a unit stranded from its degree, and not Goal (ci / vi track venue / dossier, not Goal).

Working hierarchy: Agent > Resource > Purpose (> optional Beneficiary, Time, Instrument — high / peripheral). Resource outranks Purpose for Case, passives, and measuring. What Group B Italian changes is Case cloth (per, reject DAT Goal, ne). What it does not change is the inventory.

∃e [ DESIGNATE(e)
  ∧ INITIATOR(e, pres_it)
  ∧ RESOURCE(e, 14m_btc)
  ∧ RESTRICTED_FOR(e, 14m_btc, λe′. USE_IN_NEW_TECH(e′))
  ∧ Hom(14m_btc, e) ]

Italian frames · Case clothes

Resource object under ACC; Purpose as per-PP. There is no productive DOC. Purpose does not become an object. Beneficiary sometimes looks like an applied object in allocate’s DAT, but earmark cloth keeps Beneficiary as per and refuses Goal DAT promote. Four-place surface: per Purpose (+ optional Beneficiary / Time). Primary lemmas for the page: riservare / accantonare / vincolare per (Purpose / earmark hinge; riservare also wears the restriction lean, parallel to Index 2 Romance réserver / reservar). Document all three forms; relative ranking is scout; do not invent a sense split.

1. ✓ Il presidente ha vincolato 14M BTC per una nuova tecnologia. canonical · ACC Resource · per Purpose · vincolare
2. ✓ Il presidente ha riservato 14M BTC per una nuova tecnologia. riservare · restriction lean companion · same Purpose cloth
3. ✓ Hanno accantonato fondi per comprare energia. accantonare · Purpose infinitive · Type B
4. ✓ Hanno riservato l’eccedenza. Purpose contextually bound
5. ✓ Hanno vincolato 14M per il ministero. Beneficiary; Purpose implicit
6. ✓ Hanno vincolato 14M per il ministero per la tecnologia. four-place surface · two per-PPs
7. ✓ Hanno riservato le monete come riserva strategica. come-Role · classification, not Purpose
8. ? Hanno vincolato 14M BTC al ministero. a coerces toward allocate Goal · packaging change
9. ? Hanno destinato 14M BTC per una nuova tecnologia. destinare per scout · Purpose lean · not Goal
10. ✓ Hanno destinato 14M BTC al ministero. allocate contrast · a-Goal live
11. ✓ Hanno stanziato 14M BTC al ministero. allocate hinge · stanziare a
12. * Il presidente ha vincolato una nuova tecnologia 14M BTC. no DOC · Purpose ≠ object
13. * Non gli hanno vincolato 14M BTC? as Goal reject Goal DAT promote · earmark cloth
14. ✓ Non gli hanno destinato 14M BTC? allocate Goal DAT · * on this root
15. ✓ 14M BTC sono stati vincolati / riservati / accantonati per una nuova tecnologia. Resource QP promotes
16. * Una nuova tecnologia è stata vincolata 14M BTC. Purpose ≠ ACC promote
17. * Il ministero è stato vincolato 14M BTC. Ben ≠ Goal-promote · use allocate / grant
18. * Hanno vincolato 14M BTC che Trump vinca. Purpose ≠ settlement Content

MeasureP WH · denomination diagnostics

WH forces Amount ≠ Denomination inside one Case object. Verbal WH sees the Resource MeasureP under ACC, not unit and degree as two objects of earmark. Same MeasureP pattern as pay_GIVE’s Amount, sell’s Price, charge_FEE’s fee, deduct’s decrement, bet’s Stake, and allocate’s Theme — here the MeasureP is the restricted Resource (ACC), and Purpose stays a selected per-PP.

1. ✓ Quanti BTC ha vincolato il presidente per una nuova tecnologia? unit bound
2. ✓ Quanto hanno riservato per una nuova tecnologia? unit contextually bound
3. ✓ Quanto di cosa hanno vincolato per una nuova tecnologia? n and U inside host
4. ✓ In che / di che / in quale moneta ne hanno vincolato 14M? U recoding · ne tracks quantity
5. ✓ Cosa hanno vincolato / riservato / accantonato per una nuova tecnologia? bare WHAT · Resource
6. * Cosa hanno vincolato 14M per una nuova tecnologia? LBC · stranded n
7. * Quanto hanno vincolato BTC per una nuova tecnologia? LBC · U stranded
8. ✓ Per cosa hanno vincolato 14M BTC? Purpose
9. * Cosa hanno vincolato 14M BTC? as Purpose ACC Purpose needs per · not ACC
10. ✓ Per chi hanno vincolato 14M BTC? Beneficiary
11. * A chi hanno vincolato 14M BTC? as allocate Goal a-Goal is wrong cloth on earmark-leaning vincolare per
12. ✓ A chi hanno destinato 14M BTC? allocate Goal contrast
13. ✓ Quanti BTC hanno vincolato per cosa? Superiority · Resource > Purpose
14. ✓ Non hanno vincolato 14M BTC per una nuova tecnologia? NegQ · MeasureP cheap associate
15. ✓ Non hanno riservato 14M BTC per una nuova tecnologia? riservare · same Neg cheapness
16. ✓ Non ne hanno vincolato 14M per una nuova tecnologia? ne quantity · MeasureP resume
17. * Non gli hanno vincolato 14M al ministero? as Goal DAT Goal reject · §11.2 hinge

Superiority ranks Agent > Resource > Purpose / Beneficiary > (optional Time / Vehicle). Amount and Denomination never compete as two verbal WH-items. Cheap NegQ association tracks the Case object: ACC MeasureP under vincolare / riservare / accantonare. Quantity clitic ne resumes the QP (Romance Group B map); ci / vi track venue / dossier, not Goal. Purpose-per is selected enough to WH with per cosa?; it is not a second ACC and does not promote like Goal. DAT on destinare / stanziare a is Goal/Ben allocate cloth, not Purpose.

Geometry · earmark ≠ allocate_GOAL ≠ grant_GIVE ≠ riservare_restriction ≠ detrarre

In Il presidente ha vincolato 14M BTC per una nuova tecnologia, the BTC is restricted for a use. New technology does not HAVE the coins. Spending is not e2. That is Allocation with Purpose flavour — not Goal-address (allocate / destinare / stanziare a), not conferral (grant / concedere / elargire), not Risk, not Exchange.

• ≠ allocate_GOAL · IT / destinare / stanziare a. Shared designation, MeasureP, authority, Type B Purpose available, missing spend-true. Split: listed third is Purpose property P via per (earmark) vs Goal individual y via a / DAT (allocate). Goal DAT / promote (✓ Non gli hanno destinato 14M?); earmark Beneficiary does not (*Non gli hanno vincolato 14M? as Goal). HAVE idle on earmark, sliding on allocate. Live twin: allocate-goal-it.html.
• ≠ grant_GIVE / concedere / elargire. Shared authority and MeasureP available. Split: grant requires Appl_HAVE / HAVE-RIGHT; earmark refuses HAVE as e2 and keeps Purpose as per. Follow-up No — il ministero non ha mai ricevuto diritti di disposizione challenges grant e2; on earmark it is idle (restriction can hold without drawing rights).
• ≠ book / reserve / schedule / Index 2 prenotare / pianificare / companion riservare as Ben/Time only. Same Allocation family (Index 2 lists prenotare / pianificare). Split: reserve a cabin per la squadra is Beneficiary; schedule per venerdì is Time; earmark 14M BTC per una nuova tecnologia is Purpose. Same family of heads; different flavour of the non-measuring inner relation. This page uses riservare as companion restriction lean — not a Ben/Time-only collapse, and not a fake sense subscript.
• ≠ vendere / sell. Sell: Recipient HAS goods; Price stays inside per. Earmark: Resource is ACC MeasureP of the restriction; per una nuova tecnologia is Purpose, not Price. No SWAP inversion. (Italian per overloads Price vs Purpose — sell keeps Price; this root keeps Purpose.)
• ≠ bet / scommettere. Shared MeasureP packaging and a non-individual third of type ⟨s,t⟩. Split: bet’s third is settlement Content (Proposition); earmark’s is a use-property (RESTRICTED_FOR). *hanno vincolato 14M che Trump vinca — Purpose is not Settle(p).
• ≠ deduct / detrarre / credit_FIN / charge_FEE / pay_GIVE. Shared MeasureP Hom available. Split: deduct’s per is Reason (JUSTIFIED_BY) with FROM decrement; credit_FIN writes ledger HAS_ON_BOOKS; chargeFEE / pay write levy or Appl_HAVE. Earmark tags a Resource; amount need not leave. Four pers: Purpose (earmark) ≠ Reason (deduct) ≠ Consideration (charge) ≠ Price (sell).
• Restriction-true is e2. A follow-up that denies spending, building the technology, transfer out of the reserve, or HAVE does not deny the earmark event. Un-earmark / reallocate (svincolare / riassegnare / ridestinare scout) is a separate event that terminates e2.

Shells, ApplP, and Case

VoiceP  [ il presidente
  (BenP / TimeP)
  VP  [ √EARMARK / √VINCOL- / √RISERV- / √ACCANTON-   [ MeasureP  [ Amount 14M ] [ N BTC ] ] ]
  PurpP  [ per  [ una nuova tecnologia ] ]

Packaging (same geometry):
  vincolare per · accantonare · riservare
  — Purpose stays per; Resource stays ACC
  destinare / stanziare a — Goal cloth; do not merge

Voice introduces Agent with AUTHORITY(x,e) as a selectional / felicity conjunct — not a fifth argument. Presidents, legislatures, CFOs, DAOs, and statutes pass; bare persons need a hat; weather fails. Resource sits as Incremental Theme of the designation under ACC. Purpose attaches as Type B Purp/Res outside the first phase, spelled per. There is no Recipient HAVE shell and no ACC / DAT promotion of Purpose or Beneficiary as Goal. Putting a promotable a-Goal / DAT clitic in is how the allocate cloth (destinare / stanziare a) is written — a different root packaging, not √EARMARK growing a listed Goal.

Italian assigns ACC to the Resource only. Purpose, Beneficiary, Time, Source are PPs (per, marked a toward allocate, da). Quantity clitic ne resumes the MeasureP. Passive promotes the Resource QP as a whole — never Amount alone, never U alone, never Purpose into subject, never Beneficiary (*Il ministero è stato vincolato 14M; *Non gli hanno vincolato 14M? as Goal).

Underivables (Italian · this root)

1. * Una nuova tecnologia è stata vincolata 14M BTC. Purpose ≠ ACC / subject
2. * Il ministero è stato vincolato 14M BTC. Ben ≠ ACC · use allocate / grant
3. * Non gli hanno vincolato 14M BTC al ministero? as Goal Goal DAT reject
4. * 14M sono stati vincolati BTC per una nuova tecnologia. Amount ≠ separate passive
5. * BTC sono stati vincolati 14M per una nuova tecnologia. U ≠ separate passive
6. * Cosa hanno vincolato 14M per una nuova tecnologia? LBC · stranded n
7. * Hanno vincolato 14M BTC che Trump vinca. Purpose ≠ Content
8. * Il tempo ha vincolato 14M BTC per una nuova tecnologia. Voice filter
9. * Il presidente ha vincolato una nuova tecnologia 14M BTC. no DOC
10. * A chi hanno vincolato 14M BTC? as allocate Goal a-Goal is allocate cloth
11. * Hanno vincolato una nuova tecnologia per 14M BTC. no SWAP
12. * Non hanno fatto vincolare 14M BTC per la tecnologia dal tempo? fare does not wash Voice filter

Group B packaging · this tick Italian Purpose only

Group B (Spanish, French, Italian) keeps the Goal vs Purpose Case split under Neg. Quote §11.2: “Spanish destinar / asignar fondos a vs reservar / afectar para; French allouer / affecter à vs réserver / flécher pour; Italian destinare / stanziare a vs accantonare / vincolare per. DAT / à / a is the allocate Goal and can cliticize; that clitic is a cheap Neg associate and is the Romance reason allocate looks more like grant than earmark does. en / ne tracks the quantity on both. y tracks a venue or dossier, not Goal. para / pour / per remains Purpose. destinar a is the hinge verb: Goal-leaning allocate, still not full HAVE unless coerced toward conceder / otorgar.”

This tick is Italian earmark only — ha vincolato 14M BTC per una nuova tecnologia (ACC Resource, per Purpose); *Non gli hanno vincolato 14M al ministero? as Goal (DAT reject); Beneficiary does not promote. English twin live at earmark.html. Japanese twin live at earmark-ja.html. Spanish twin live at earmark-es.html. French twin live at earmark-fr.html. Goal twin live at allocate-goal-it.html. Mandarin 专款专用 / 指定用于 / 把 — pointed, not deepened. Label speculation; do not fake elicitation.

Open items

• vincolare per vs accantonare vs riservare ranking. Relative naturalness of budgetary Purpose hinge vs set-aside vs restriction companion needs controlled elicitation — flagged scout-leaning, not closed. Do not invent a sense subscript. spec
• destinare per / stanziare per. Purpose-leaning packing on the destinare/stanziare hinge — open; do not merge with live allocate_GOAL · IT a-Goal. spec
• Mandarin 专款专用 / 指定用于 / 把. Now live at earmark-zh.html (把 Resource; 为了/用于 Purpose; reject 给 Goal). Relative ranking among 专款专用 / 指定用于 / 预留 remains scout. Suggested next rotate: attribute_ATT or allocate_GOAL · ZH.
• Polish GEN-neg on allocation — GEN on the Resource QP, not on Purpose, not on a stranded unit. Same prediction as bet / deduct / credit_FIN. spec
• Outer CAUSE (fare). Site on the making vs on the designation; Purpose never becomes Causee Case under √EARMARK’s Italian cloth. Spend still not entailed under the wrap. Goal DAT still unused on this cloth.
• Reserve coercion (?Kim ha riservato il divano per gli ospiti) — bleeds into √RESERVE; less authority. Border with book / reserve / Index 2 prenotare remains a packaging check, not a fifth GF.

Corpus filenames

Primary extract for this micro-entry; companions supply allocate contrast and Neg association. DOCX originals under the Tritransitive lit tree (lit/grok-tritransitive/files/). Text extract: /workspace/allocate_earmark_extract.txt (from Allocate_Earmark_Comparison.docx §11.2 Group B). Twin pages: earmark.html · earmark-ja.html · earmark-es.html · earmark-fr.html. Goal contrast: allocate-goal-it.html. NegQ chat: lit/grok-tritransitive/chats/21-negative-questions-on-earmark.md.