allocate_GOAL · 拨给 / 分配给 (bōgěi / fēnpèi gěi)

Hierarchy

Same inventory as English allocate_GOAL. Not three co-arguments of one V predicting a stable DOC and a transfer. Surface count can name the president, 14M BTC, and the ministry — but the listed third is a Goal individual y via Mandarin 给, not a Purpose property via 为了 (earmark). HAVE(y,m) is optional / speaker-variable, not required. Writing those three as sisters of a grant-like Appl_HAVE predicts a productive DOC and a drawing-rights challenge to e2. Mandarin keeps the middle, and it still refuses two 把.

1400 万 BTC = one MeasureP. Orthography / measure-word morphology is not extra arity. Amount and Denomination share one Case object. Composition is V(#P), not V(n)(U). Hom(m, e): the designation is measured by the quantity. 把 takes the whole QP under 没 / 没有; it does not split Amount from unit, and it does not front Goal or Purpose.

Working hierarchy: Agent > Theme > Goal (> optional Purpose, Time, Source — high / peripheral). Theme outranks Goal for measuring; Goal can promote in the 被 frame (unlike earmark’s Beneficiary). What Group A Mandarin changes is Case cloth. What it does not change is the inventory.

∃e [ DESIGNATE(e)
  ∧ THEME(e, m)
  ∧ GOAL(e, y)
  ∧ Hom(m, e) ]
  · HAVE(y, m) optional / speaker-variable — not listed as required

Mandarin frames · Case clothes

Theme object under ACC, often 把-fronted as a whole QP; Goal as the individual introduced by 给 (inside 拨给 / 分配给) that can promote. There is no productive DOC and no two-把 of Theme plus Goal. 为了 / 用于 is an optional Type B Purpose on top of Goal — not a substitute for the 给-third. Primary lemma: 拨给 / bōgěi. Companion 分配给 / fēnpèi gěi is the same GOAL cloth. 专款专用 / 指定用于 are the live earmark contrast. 预留 stays that sister’s scout.

1. ✓ 总统把 1400 万 BTC 拨给了部委。 canonical · 把 whole QP · 给-Goal · 拨给
2. ✓ 总统把 1400 万 BTC 分配给了部委。 分配给 · same GOAL cloth
3. ✓ 总统为了新技术把 1400 万 BTC 拨给了部委。 four-place · 给-Goal + 为了 Purpose
4. ✓ 他们把资金拨给了实验室，用于购买能源。 Purpose 用于 · Type B extra
5. ✓ 他们拨给了这笔余款。 Goal contextually bound
6. ✓ 他们为了新技术拨了 1400 万。 Goal dropped · looks like earmark · packaging change
7. ✓ 总统拨给了部委 1400 万 BTC。 给-Goal postverbal · still one Goal · not a second 把
8. * 总统拨了部委 1400 万 BTC。 no productive DOC · Goal needs 给
9. * 总统把部委把 1400 万 BTC 拨给了。 no two-把 of Theme+Goal
10. * 总统把 1400 万 BTC 拨了部委。 missing 给 · Goal ≠ bare second object
11. * 总统把新技术拨给了 1400 万 BTC。 为了-as-only-third · 把 does not front Purpose
12. ✓ 1400 万 BTC 被拨给了部委。 Theme QP promotes
13. ✓ 部委被拨给了 1400 万 BTC。 Goal promotes · grant-like · * on earmark Ben
14. * 部委被指定了 1400 万 BTC。 earmark contrast · Ben ≠ Goal-promote · 指定用于
15. ✓ 实验室被授予了 1400 万 BTC 的提取权。 grant · HAVE Recipient promotes cleanly
16. * 他们拨给了 1400 万 BTC 川普会赢。 Goal ≠ settlement Content
17. * 他们把金拨给了夜班。 allocate_POST · off this page
18. * 他们把责任拨给了承包商。 allocate_ASCRIBE · off this page
19. * 他们把三个小时拨给了这个问题。 allocate_SLOT · off this page

MeasureP WH · Neg diagnostics

WH forces Amount ≠ Denomination inside one Case object. Verbal WH sees the Theme MeasureP under ACC / 把, not unit and degree as two objects of allocate. Same MeasureP pattern as pay_GIVE’s Amount, sell’s Price, charge_FEE’s fee, deduct’s decrement, bet’s Stake, and earmark’s Resource — here the MeasureP is the addressed Theme, and Goal stays a selected 给-individual (or promoted). Under Neg, 把 fronts the whole QP (没 / 没有); 把 does not front Goal or Purpose, and it does not split Amount from U.

1. ✓ 总统把多少 BTC 拨给了部委？ unit bound
2. ✓ 他们把多少拨给了部委？ unit contextually bound
3. ✓ 他们把什么拨给了部委？ bare WHAT · Theme
4. ✓ 他们用什么币把 1400 万拨给了部委？ U recoding
5. * 他们把 1400 万什么拨给了部委？ LBC strand · Amount leaving unit
6. * 他们把多少拨给了 BTC 部委？ Amount ≠ U as separate objects
7. ✓ 他们把 1400 万 BTC 拨给了谁？ Goal
8. ✓ 他们为了什么把 1400 万 BTC 拨给了部委？ Purpose extra
9. ? 他们把 1400 万 BTC 拨给了什么用途？ Goal is an individual, not a use
10. * 他们把 1400 万 BTC 指定给了谁？ as allocate Goal on earmark cloth 给-Goal is wrong cloth on 指定用于 / 专款专用
11. ✓ 他们把多少 BTC 拨给了谁？ Superiority · Theme > Goal · both WH
12. ✓ 他们没有把 1400 万 BTC 拨给部委吗？ Neg · 把 whole QP under 没有
13. * 他们没有把 1400 万什么拨给部委吗？ LBC strand under 没/没有

Superiority ranks Agent > Theme > Goal > (optional Purpose / Time / Source). Amount and Denomination never compete as two verbal WH-items. Cheap NegQ association tracks the Case object: the 把-fronted Theme QP under 拨给 / 分配给. Goal-给 is selected enough to WH with 拨给了谁？ and to promote; it is not a second 把. Full NegQ parking is below.

Geometry · allocate_GOAL ≠ earmark ≠ grant_GIVE ≠ 卖 ≠ 入账

In 总统把 1400 万 BTC 拨给了部委, the BTC is addressed to an office. The ministry need not HAVE drawing rights. Spending is not e2. That is Allocation with Goal flavour — between Purpose-restriction (earmark / 专款专用 / 指定用于) and conferral (grant / 授予).

• ≠ earmark / 专款专用 / 指定用于. Shared designation, MeasureP, authority, Type B Purpose available, missing spend-true. Split: listed third is Goal individual y via 给 (allocate) vs Purpose property P via 为了 / 用于 (earmark). Goal promotes (✓ 部委被拨给了 1400 万 BTC); earmark Beneficiary does not (*部委被指定了 1400 万 BTC). HAVE idle on earmark, sliding on allocate. Live sister: earmark-zh.html. 预留 stays that page’s scout.
• ≠ grant_GIVE / 授予 / 给予. Shared promotable human third and a 给-frame available. Split: grant requires Appl_HAVE / HAVE-RIGHT; allocate’s HAVE is optional. Follow-up 不，部委没有获得提取权 challenges grant e2; on allocate it is speaker-variable (budget-speak vs disbursement-speak).
• ≠ book / reserve / schedule. Same Allocation family (Index 2 lists those three). Split: reserve a cabin 为了团队 is Beneficiary; schedule 为了周五 is Time; allocate 1400 万 BTC 拨给部委 is Goal. Earmark is Purpose flavour of the same family.
• ≠ 卖 / sell. Sell: Recipient HAS goods; Price stays inside instrument / 多少钱 cloth. Allocate: Theme is the 把 MeasureP of the designation; 部委 is Goal, not Price. No SWAP inversion. Spending not entailed. Live: sell-zh.html.
• ≠ bet / 赌. Shared MeasureP packaging. Split: bet’s third is settlement Content (Proposition); allocate’s is a Goal individual. *把 1400 万 BTC 拨给了川普会赢 — Goal is not Settle(p). Index 2 Mandarin cell is this Risk verb, not allocate.
• ≠ 入账 / credit_FIN. Shared 把-MeasureP and a 给 / 向 / 到 third available. Split: 入账 writes ledger HAS_ON_BOOKS. Allocate addresses a line without requiring that result. Particle overlap is packaging coincidence. Live: credit-fin-zh.html.
• ≠ deduct / 扣. Shared MeasureP Hom. Split: deduct’s third is FROM Domain (从); Reason is 因为. Allocate’s third is 给-Goal. Amount need not leave a domain. Live: deduct-zh.html.
• ≠ charge_FEE / 收 · pay_GIVE / 付. Shared MeasureP and a human third. Split: chargeFEE writes Appl_FROM (向 Payer) plus a levy; pay writes Appl_HAVE of the money. Allocate does not require either result. 为 on charge/pay is Consideration, not this page’s optional Purpose and not the 给-Goal. Live: charge-fee-zh.html · pay-give-zh.html.
• HAVE as sliding feature. Follow-up 不，部委没有获得提取权: idle challenge to earmark e2; default challenge to grant e2; speaker-variable on allocate. That middle is why institutional Mandarin keeps 拨给 next to 授予 and apart from 专款专用.
• Address-true is e2. A follow-up that denies spending or HAVE does not (by default) deny the allocate event. Reallocate (重新拨给 / 改拨 scout) redirects Goal; later event.

Shells, ApplP, and Case

VoiceP  [ 总统
  VP  [ √ALLOCATE_GOAL / 拨给 / 分配给
        [ MeasureP  [ Amount 1400万 ] [ N BTC ] ]把 / ACC ]
  GoalP / Appl_GOAL  [ 给  [ 部委 ] ]
  (PurpP  [ 为了 / 用于  [ 新技术 ] ])

Packaging (same geometry):
  拨给 · 分配给
  — Goal stays 给; Theme stays ACC / 把
  专款专用 / 指定用于 / 预留 — Purpose cloth; do not merge

Voice introduces Agent with AUTHORITY(x,e) as a selectional / felicity conjunct — not a fifth argument. Presidents, treasuries, CFOs, protocols, and statutes pass; bare persons need a hat; weather fails. Theme sits as Incremental Theme of the designation under ACC / 把. Goal attaches as Appl_GOAL spelled 给 — listed enough to promote, not listed enough to be a second 把 or a bare DOC object. Purpose, when present, is Type B 为了 / 用于 outside the first phase. Putting required HAVE in is how the grant cloth (授予 / 给予) is written — a different root packaging. Putting Purpose in as the only third, and refusing 给, is how earmark is written.

Mandarin assigns ACC / 把 to the Theme. Goal is 给 (or promoted to subject). Purpose, Time, Source are further coverbs. 被 promotes the Theme QP as a whole, or Goal (✓ 部委被拨给了 1400 万 BTC), never Amount alone, never U alone, never Purpose into subject. Two 把 is unused.

Underivables (Mandarin · this root)

1. * 新技术被拨给了 1400 万 BTC。 Purpose ≠ ACC / subject · 为了-as-only-third
2. * 1400 万被拨给了 BTC。 Amount ≠ separate passive
3. * BTC 被拨给了 1400 万。 U ≠ separate passive
4. * 他们把 1400 万什么拨给了部委？ LBC strand
5. * 他们拨给了 1400 万 BTC 川普会赢。 Goal ≠ Content
6. * 天气把 1400 万 BTC 拨给了部委。 Voice filter
7. * 部委被指定了 1400 万 BTC。 earmark Ben cloth · use 拨给 / grant
8. * 总统把部委把 1400 万 BTC 拨给了。 no two-把
9. * 总统拨了部委 1400 万 BTC。 no productive DOC
10. * 他们把金拨给了夜班。 POST distractor · off page
11. * 他们把责任拨给了承包商。 ASCRIBE distractor · off page
12. * 他们把三个小时拨给了这个问题。 SLOT distractor · off page
13. * 不是天气让他们把 1400 万 BTC 拨给部委的吗？ causation wrap does not wash Voice filter

NegQ pointer · association sites

Negative questions on allocate_GOAL read the Allocation-plus-Goal geometry; they do not invent a fourth theta name. Neg sits high and associates downward. Cheap inner associate = Theme QP in the 把-frame (Goal if promoted). Purpose stays 为了 / 用于 when present. Spend-true missing as default; HAVE challenge speaker-variable.

Group A packaging · this tick Mandarin GOAL only

Group A (English, Japanese, Mandarin, Navajo) keeps the Goal vs Purpose Case split under Neg. Quote Allocate_Earmark_Comparison §11.2: “Chinese 拨给 / 分配给 write Goal with 给 and lean allocate; 专款专用 / 指定用于 write Purpose without a Goal and lean earmark; 把 fronts the QP on both. 给 is the allocate diagnostic; 为了 is the Purpose diagnostic.” Quote Negative_Questions_Earmark: “Chinese 把 fronts the whole QP under 没 / 没有. 为 / 为了 marks Purpose. 给 marks a Beneficiary when the packaging leans allocate. 把 does not front Purpose.”

This tick is Mandarin allocate_GOAL only — 没有把 1400 万 BTC 拨给部委 (把 Theme, 给-Goal); *two-把; *bare DOC; *为了 as the only third. Purpose 为了 / 用于 stays an optional extra. English twin is live at allocate-goal.html. Japanese twin is live at allocate-goal-ja.html. Spanish, French, and Italian twins are live. Purpose sister is live at earmark-zh.html (专款专用 / 指定用于; 预留 scout). Navajo: classificatory handling stems plus outer purpose or beneficiary postpositions; restriction-without-Goal vs address-to-office is particles and context, not two inner Patients — remains open/scout. Sell · Navajo remains deferred. Label speculation on ranking; do not fake elicitation.

Open items

• 拨给 vs 分配给 ranking. Both wear GOAL cloth in the extract. Relative naturalness of budgetary 拨给 vs split-among 分配给 needs controlled elicitation — flagged scout-leaning, not closed. Do not invent a sense split. spec
• 预留. Stays the earmark restriction scout on earmark-zh.html. Not merged into this Goal page. spec
• Navajo HANDLE. Classificatory-stem packaging remains labeled speculation/scout. Sell · Navajo also deferred. spec
• Polish GEN-neg on allocation — GEN on the Theme QP in the to-frame, not on Purpose, not on a stranded unit; Goal DAT/PP should refuse GEN unless Goal is ACC. Same prediction as bet / deduct / credit_FIN. spec
• HAVE sliding — budget-speak vs disbursement-speak on 拨给 vs 授予. Follow-up 不，部委没有获得提取权 stays speaker-variable here; do not force grant’s drawing-rights default.
• Outer CAUSE. Site on the making vs on the designation; Goal may promote under the wrap; HAVE still not required; two-把 still unused.
• POST / ASCRIBE / SLOT distractors — keep off this NegQ profile. Separate stubs if deepened later.

Corpus filenames

Primary extract for this micro-entry; companions supply earmark sister geometry and Neg association. DOCX originals under the Tritransitive lit tree (lit/grok-tritransitive/files/). Text extract used this tick: /workspace/allocate_earmark_extract.txt (from Allocate_Earmark_Comparison.docx §11.2 Group A). Sister page: earmark-zh.html. English twin: allocate-goal.html.