Debtor, debt, Creditor · Hindi marking · working claim, revisable
Hindi has no single lexical verb equal to English owe. The participants sit on a debt noun and a light verb or a copula. R. S. McGregor, The Oxford Hindi-English Dictionary (p. 174), क़र्ज़ qarz, masculine: 1 a debt. 2 a loan. The collocations are उठाना (of, का), उतारना or अदा करना or चुकाना ‘to pay a debt’, काढ़ना or लेना ‘to take a loan (from, से)’, खाना ‘to live on money borrowed (from, का)’, and देना ‘to lend (to, को)’. None of those glosses is the English verb owe. क़र्ज़दार is ‘indebted, owing; a debtor’. ऋण r̥ṇ (p. 139) is masculine, ‘a debt; credit; debit; an obligation’, and the collocations are sent to क़र्ज़. ऋण-दाता is ‘a creditor’. John T. Platts, A Dictionary of Urdu, Classical Hindi, and English (p. 790), is the entry that prints the English verb: qarẓ rakhnā (-kā) ‘To have a debt (of), to owe.’ The debtor is the subject of रखना. -का is the amount, the same parenthesis as qarẓ uṭhānā (-kā) ‘to contract or incur a debt’ and as qarẓ lenā ‘with gen. -kā of amount’. Platts prints no finite clause, no creditor, and no पर.
उधार udhār. McGregor (p. 125), masculine: 1 a loan. 2 a debt; credit. उधार होना is ‘to be on loan; to have been borrowed, to be owing (by)’. The English by names the debtor. The entry prints no postposition on that debtor. उधार देना (को) is ‘to lend; to sell on credit; to discharge a debt’. उधार लेना is ‘to borrow; to buy on credit’. Hardev Bahri, Learners’ Hindi-English Dictionary (p. 67), उधार masculine: credit, loan. उधार का रूपया is loan-money. का agrees with masculine रूपया. उधार की पुस्तके is loaned books. की agrees with the feminine plural. मैंने रूपया उधार दिया था, तुमने लिया था is ‘I had lent money, you had borrowed it.’ Those का and की are on things. They are not a creditor.
Possessor and location, working claim. The debt noun is the subject of होना. The debt is on the debtor. McGregor’s पर sense 1 (p. 601) is ‘on, upon; over’. The creditor is the possessor, का / की / के, and that postposition agrees with the debt noun. McGregor’s का (p. 186) sense 1 is ‘of; belonging to’. उस का एक घर था has का with masculine singular घर. उसकी सिर्फ़ एक ही आँख है has की with feminine आँख. गाँव के लोग has के with masculine plural लोग. हिंदी की एक किताब has की with feminine किताब. क़र्ज़, उधार, and ऋण are masculine, so the cell on those nouns is का. Sense 5, उसके एक बहन है, is the oblique connective. It is a different use of के. मुझ पर तुम्हारा क़र्ज़ है stacks the debtor in पर, the creditor in masculine तुम्हारा, and singular है with क़र्ज़. It is constructed. A stack that puts the debtor in का and the creditor in पर is not in these entries. It is not filed. The पर of उधार खाए बैठना, ‘to wait intently (for, पर)’, is that idiom. It is not this debtor.
Obligation. The debtor is a dative subject, and the creditor is the recipient of देना. Both are को. Rajesh Bhatt, Tina Bögel, Miriam Butt, Annette Hautli, and Sebastian Sulger, “Urdu/Hindi Modals” (LFG11, CSLI, 2011), example (2c): a dative subject, an infinitive, and होना, glossed ‘Yasin has/wants to do this’. The reading is ambiguous between an obligation and a desire. Example (11a) is the same dative. Example (11b) puts the subject in ergative ने and glosses the desire, ‘Yasin wants to do this’. The obligation’s debtor is the dative, not that ergative. McGregor’s देना sense 3 is ‘to make (a payment)’, beside ‘to give’. The recipient is को sense 2 (p. 215): उसको किताब दिजिए, ‘please give him a book’. The sum is the unmarked complement. McGregor’s पर sense 4 prints इस पर फ़ीस देनी है, ‘there are the fees to pay as well’. देनी is feminine, with feminine फ़ीस. That पर is ‘as well’. It is not a person. Bhatt et al. (2c) print a masculine singular infinitive with a singular nominative. Their feminine plural infinitive, example (3), is with चाहिए, not with होना. मुझे तुम्हें सौ रुपये देने हैं puts the debtor in मुझे, the creditor in तुम्हें, and masculine plural देने हैं with रुपये, the plural of Bahri’s masculine रूपया. The plural is the number extension of देनी है and of the singular infinitive in (2c). The clause is constructed. The two को phrases are the persons. The infinitive matches the unmarked noun: देनी matches फ़ीस, and the infinitive in (2c) matches the singular nominative. Yamuna Kachru, Hindi (John Benjamins, 2006), describes agreement on the perfective transitive: a को-marked object does not control it. No page number is cited. That perfective is the bill page. It is not this infinitive.
से is the source, or the debt noun, and it is not the creditor of the state. McGregor’s क़र्ज़ लेना is ‘from, से’. Platts: qarẓ lenā takes the person in -se. McGregor’s एहसान लेना is ‘from, से’. Bahri (p. 76) वह ऋण से दबा है is ‘he is heavily in debt’. से is on ऋण. The lending को is the other direction. McGregor क़र्ज़ देना is ‘to lend (to, को)’. The subject is the lender. Bahri ऋण देना is ‘to lend money’. That को is the borrower. It is not the creditor of देना है.
Indebtedness is a separate sense, and it has no sum. McGregor ऋणी (p. 139): 1 indebted (to, का). 2 under obligation (to). Sense 2 does not repeat का. 3 masculine, a debtor. Bahri (p. 76): मैं आपका ऋणी रहूँगा, ‘I shall be indebted/obliged to you.’ The debtor is unmarked मैं. The creditor is आपका. का agrees with masculine ऋणी. रहूँगा is masculine first-person singular future. It agrees with the debtor. The copula of that line is रहना, not होना. मैं आपका ऋणी हूँ is constructed. Feminine रहूँगी is unprinted. एहसान (p. 143) is ‘favour; sense of obligation, gratitude’. एहसान करना and रखना are ‘to, पर’. एहसान का बोझ (किसी पर) loads the obligation on a person. एहसान मानना is ‘from, का’. एहसान लेना is ‘from, से’. Platts (p. 29) prints the same set: rakhnā (-par), karnā (-par), lenā (se), mānnā (-kā). पर on एहसान is the person the favour is done to, the one placed under the obligation. English I owed the surgeon my life and I owe my success to my teachers stay on owe.
Where this frame diverges from English X owes Y Z. English owe is one verb. The debtor is the subject. The creditor is a bare object, owes me $5, I owe Janet $50, or to after the sum, She still owes £3 000 to her father. The sum is one object. The same verb prints I owed the surgeon my life and I owe my success to my teachers. Hindi splits the work. Platts’s to owe is क़र्ज़ रखना: the debtor is the subject of रखना, का is the amount, and the creditor is unprinted. The possessor-locative makes the debt the subject of होना, puts that debt on the debtor with पर, and puts the creditor in agreeing का. English does not make the debt the subject, and it does not put the debtor in on. The English on of on our car is a different phrase, on the English page. देना है gives both persons को. English separates them by the subject and by a bare object or to. The postposition does not. ऋणी and एहसान take the gratitude line off the sum. Paying the debt is चुकाना. This page does not open that frame.