deduct · afschrijven / aftrekken

Hierarchy

Same inventory as English deduct, the Group C twins, and live German abbuchen. Not five sisters of one V. Surface count can name the board, 0,3, ETH, every account, and a Q3 threshold — but Amount and Denomination share one MeasureP, Domain is one van-phrase, and Reason is high / outer. elke quantifies that one Domain. It is not an extra argument. The same quantifier on the FIN page quantifies one Account, as an IO or under op, without van.

0,3 ETH = one MeasureP. Orthography is not extra arity (Dutch decimal comma, the same string already on the live FIN page). Amount and Denomination are both inner arguments of that object. Composition is V(MeasureP), not V(n)(U). Hom(e, ⟨n,U⟩): the decrement is measured by degree n on scale U. Leaving the unit outside the MeasureP strands it. The noun het bedrag and the counted QP drie bedragen are the same one object. They do not display a case ending that German uses to separate accusative from genitive.

Working hierarchy: Agent-ish > MeasureP ⟨Amount, Denomination⟩ > Domain > Reason. Ranking on afschrijven is Initiator (subject) > MeasureP (structural object, including under niet) > Domain (van). Weather still fails the Initiator. e2 is the decrement. HAS_ON_BOOKS, debit/OWE, and payout are other roots.

Dutch frames · Case clothes

One ranked lemma, afschrijven. Companion aftrekken is named and is not a second frame. The working cloth uses perfect heeft … afgeschreven with subject De raad, the same subject as printed heeft … gecrediteerd. The MeasureP is the structural object. The Domain is under van. Separable af is lemma morphology: right edge in V2, inside the participle, split around te in the infinitive (af te schrijven), the same pattern as FIN’s bij te schrijven. A subordinate clause keeps the prefix attached to the verb. Do not conflate this van-Domain with FIN’s IO Account, with FIN’s op + Account, with FEE’s voor Consideration, with blame’s van Charge, or with a bare aan. V2 and the R-pronoun waarvan are not a fourth argument. waarvan resumes van. Blame already states that this R-pronoun does not strand van.

1. ✓ De raad heeft 0,3 ETH van elke rekening afgeschreven. working cloth · constructed · MeasureP + van+Domain · affirmative of the string FIN rejects
2. ✓ De raad schrijft 0,3 ETH van elke rekening af. V2 · separable af at the right edge · lemma morphology, like FIN bij · constructed
3. ✓ …, dat de raad 0,3 ETH van elke rekening afschrijft. subordinate · prefix stays attached · constructed
4. ✓ De bank heeft 0,3 ETH van elke rekening afgeschreven. Initiator = institution · constructed
5. ✓ Het clearinghouse heeft 0,3 ETH van elke rekening afgeschreven. Initiator = institution · wording matched to FIN · constructed
6. ✓ Het slimme contract heeft 0,3 ETH van elke rekening afgeschreven. Initiator = code · constructed
7. ✓ De raad heeft het bedrag van elke rekening afgeschreven. noun MeasureP · het bedrag · no case ending to read as GEN · constructed
8. ✓ De raad heeft drie bedragen van elke rekening afgeschreven. counted QP · one MeasureP · constructed
9. ✓ De raad heeft 0,3 ETH van elke rekening afgeschreven wegens de drempel in het derde kwartaal. outer Reason · wegens · not FEE voor · constructed · same Reason cloth as FIN
10. ✓ Men heeft 0,3 ETH van elke rekening afgeschreven. men demotion · MeasureP stays the object · parallel to FIN Men heeft … bijgeschreven
11. ✓ De raad heeft 0,3 ETH van elke rekening niet afgeschreven. niet before the participle · af stays inside afgeschreven · Domain stays van · GEN-neg N/A
12. ✓ De raad heeft het bedrag van elke rekening niet afgeschreven. noun MeasureP under niet · form unchanged · constructed
13. ✓ De raad heeft drie bedragen van elke rekening niet afgeschreven. counted QP stays one object · unit inside the QP · constructed
14. ✓ 0,3 ETH werd van elke rekening afgeschreven. worden promotes the MeasureP · van here is the Domain · constructed
15. ✓ Het bedrag werd van elke rekening afgeschreven. noun MeasureP promoted · participle uninflected
16. ✓ 0,3 ETH werd door de raad van elke rekening afgeschreven. passive agent door · so van elke rekening is not read as the agent · constructed
17. ✓ FIN contrast, printed: De raad heeft elke rekening 0,3 ETH gecrediteerd. Account = DO · amount = MeasureP · credit-fin-nl.html
18. ✓ FIN contrast, printed cloth: een bedrag bijschrijven op een rekening. op+Account · the string already on the MERIT and ATT pages
19. ✓ FIN contrast, on the FIN page: De raad heeft 0,3 ETH op elke rekening bijgeschreven. op+Account · ACC MeasureP · directional goal, not a second object
20. ✓ FIN contrast, on the FIN page: De raad schrijft 0,3 ETH op elke rekening bij. V2 · separable bij · same morphology type as af
21. ✓ FIN contrast, on the FIN page: 0,3 ETH werd op elke rekening bijgeschreven. worden promotes the MeasureP · op stays
22. ✓ FIN contrast, on the FIN page: Elke rekening kreeg 0,3 ETH bijgeschreven. krijgen-passive of the IO Account · FIN only
23. ✓ FEE contrast, on the FEE page: Ze hebben twintig euro voor het eten in rekening gebracht. complex predicate · voor Consideration · Payer unfilled · charge-fee-nl.html
24. * FEE contrast, on the FEE page: Wat twintig brengen ze in rekening? LBC on the fee QP · starred there · e2 there is debit / OWE
25. ✓ ATT contrast, printed: De raad heeft de aannemer de vroegtijdige oplevering toegeschreven. ACC = Charge · IO = Target · attribute-att-nl.html
26. ✓ MERIT contrast, printed: De investeerders hebben de aannemer de vroegtijdige oplevering toegeschreven. same letters · credit-merit-nl.html
27. ✓ blame contrast, printed: De commissie gaf de aannemer de schuld van de vertraging. ACC = the noun · van = Charge · blame-nl.html
28. ✓ DE contrast: Der Rat hat 0,3 ETH von jedem Konto abgebucht. von+DAT · deduct-de.html
29. ✓ HU contrast: A tanács minden számláról 0,3 ETH-t levont. DEL Domain + ACC MeasureP · deduct-hu.html
30. ✓ BG contrast: Съветът отчисли 0,3 ETH от сметката. от+Domain · deduct-bg.html
31. ✓ PL contrast: Rada odjęła 0,3 ETH z rachunku. ACC MeasureP + z+GEN · deduct-pl.html
32. * De raad heeft niet af 0,3 ETH van elke rekening geschreven. fake Focus split · af does not leave the participle · not Hungarian le-
33. * …, dat de raad 0,3 ETH van elke rekening schrijft af. subordinate clause does not strand af
34. * De raad heeft elke rekening 0,3 ETH afgeschreven. IO Account = bijschrijven / TO, not FROM
35. * De raad heeft 0,3 ETH op elke rekening afgeschreven. op+Account = FIN directional Account, not this Domain
36. * De raad heeft 0,3 ETH en elke rekening afgeschreven. no DOC of MeasureP + Domain as two bare Themes
37. * De raad heeft elke rekening en 0,3 ETH afgeschreven. no coordination of two bare Themes
38. * De raad heeft 0,3 ETH van elke rekening bijgeschreven. already starred on FIN · van is this root, not bijschrijven
39. * De raad heeft 0,3 ETH van elke rekening voor een bitcoin afgeschreven. voor is FEE Consideration, not deduct Reason · Reason is wegens
40. * Het slechte weer heeft 0,3 ETH van elke rekening afgeschreven. weather ≠ Initiator
41. * Elke rekening werd 0,3 ETH afgeschreven. no promotion of the van-PP Domain
42. * Elke rekening kreeg 0,3 ETH afgeschreven. krijgen-passive is FIN’s IO Account, not this Domain

MeasureP WH / LBC

afschrijven has a verbal MeasureP. Amount and Denomination compose one measure object. Whole-QP pied-piping is free under Neg. Amount-only is free when the unit is bound. Left-branch extraction of Amount leaving the unit next to the verb is still out — same LBC record as English deduct, sell, charge_FEE, and the live credit_FIN twins. van pied-pipes with the Domain. It does not split the MeasureP, and it does not strand the noun. waarvan resumes that van, the same R-pronoun family as FEE’s waarvoor and as blame’s waarvan. The licensers differ. V2 and the R-pronoun are not a fourth argument. There is no Hungarian preverbal Focus slot, so WH fronting is not a second host competing with a particle. Separable af goes to the right edge in a main clause and stays on the verb in a subordinate clause. It does not sit in a Focus host. Degree WH below uses ETH so it is not confused with a counted noun.

1. ✓ Hoeveel ETH heeft de raad van elke rekening afgeschreven? whole MeasureP
2. ✓ Hoeveel heeft de raad van elke rekening afgeschreven? degree WH · U bound
3. ✓ Van welke rekening heeft de raad 0,3 ETH afgeschreven? van+Domain WH · whole PP
4. ✓ Waarvan heeft de raad 0,3 ETH afgeschreven? R-pronoun · resumes van · does not strand
5. ✓ Wie heeft 0,3 ETH van elke rekening afgeschreven? Initiator WH
6. ✓ Wat heeft de raad van elke rekening afgeschreven? whole MeasureP as wat
7. ✓ Waarom heeft de raad 0,3 ETH van elke rekening afgeschreven? Reason · same WH as FIN Waarom · not FEE waarvoor
8. ✓ Wie heeft hoeveel ETH waarvan afgeschreven? cluster hypothesis · not a ranked elicitation · not Hungarian Focus uniqueness
9. * Hoeveel heeft de raad ETH van elke rekening afgeschreven? LBC · U stranded · same cut as FIN Hoeveel heeft de raad ETH
10. * Wat heeft de raad 0,3 van elke rekening afgeschreven? what hijacks the object · stranded n
11. * Van welke heeft de raad rekening 0,3 ETH afgeschreven? van does not strand the noun
12. * Waar heeft de raad 0,3 ETH van afgeschreven? waarvan does not strand van
13. ✓ FEE pointer, on the FEE page: Wat brengen ze in rekening? WH = fee MeasureP · not this Domain · charge-fee-nl.html
14. ✓ FEE pointer, on the FEE page: Waarvoor hebben ze twintig euro niet in rekening gebracht? waarvoor = Consideration · not deduct Reason
15. ✓ blame pointer: waarvan on blame resumes Charge · blame-nl.html · not this Domain

Superiority ranks Initiator > MeasureP > van-Domain > outer Reason. Amount and Denomination never compete as two verbal WH-items. Cheap NegQ association tracks the MeasureP. Challenging the Domain wants that book already in the associate, under van or resumed by waarvan. Multiple WH fronting stays an open cluster flag. It is not an elicited superiority paradigm, and it is not Hungarian Focus uniqueness. Dutch has no ли. The polar question is verb-first.

Geometry · deduct ≠ credit_FIN ≠ charge_FEE ≠ charge_ACCUSE ≠ ATT / MERIT / blame ≠ pay

In the constructed cloth De raad heeft 0,3 ETH van elke rekening afgeschreven, the board takes 0,3 ETH off the account’s book. That is FROM_SET decrement. The account is Domain. 0,3 ETH is MeasureP. e2 is decrement-true of that measure from the Domain.

• ≠ credit_FIN / bijschrijven / crediteren. Shared MeasureP. Opposite polarity: deduct = FROM_SET decrement; FIN = TO_SET increment. FIN’s printed cloths are Account as DO on crediteren (De raad heeft elke rekening 0,3 ETH gecrediteerd) and op + Account on bijschrijven (een bedrag bijschrijven op een rekening), with an IO Account as the constructed twin of the German dative. van on the account is this root (*heeft 0,3 ETH van elke rekening bijgeschreven, already starred there). FIN’s e2 is HAS_ON_BOOKS. Payout is not entailed there, and it is not e2 here. Separable bij and separable af are the same kind of lemma prefix. They do not make the roots one verb. Live twin: credit-fin-nl.html.
• ≠ charge_FEE / in rekening brengen. Shared FROM family and a verbal measure. FEE’s e2 is debit / OWE. FEE’s Consideration is voor (voor het eten, on the FEE page), resumed by waarvoor. The predicate is brengen plus the fixed piece in rekening. That piece is not a separable prefix and not this Domain. Deduct ranks the Domain as van and files Reason as wegens. The FEE page’s earlier note that the FIN van reject points at decrement is a pointer to this root. It is not evidence that FEE’s open Payer was a van-PP, and it is not a second deduct frame. Live twin: charge-fee-nl.html.
• ≠ charge_ACCUSE / aanklagen. Ascription: Judge > Target > Accusation. Different root. No selected MeasureP. No Appl_FROM of a measure. The FEE plate names aanklagen and does not print a worked string. See charge-accuse.html.
• ≠ blame / de schuld geven. Fault ascription. The accusative is the light noun de schuld. The person is IO or aan. Charge is van, resumed by waarvan. That van is Charge content. It is not deduct’s Domain and not FEE’s Consideration. Printed: De commissie gaf de aannemer de schuld van de vertraging. Weather is a fine Target and a failed Initiator.
• ≠ attribute_ATT / toeschrijven. Content-ascribe. Accusative Charge + IO or aan-Target. No MeasureP and no Domain. Printed: De raad heeft de aannemer de vroegtijdige oplevering toegeschreven. Live twin: attribute-att-nl.html.
• ≠ credit_MERIT / toeschrijven + verdienste. Merit ascribe on the same letters as ATT. IO Target + accusative Charge. No MeasureP. Live at credit-merit-nl.html. Do not invent credit-merit-bg.html. Do not invent credit-merit-pl.html.
• ≠ betalen / overmaken / pay_GIVE. Index 2 Payment. Pay writes a MeasureP with Recipient HAVE. Deduct writes a MeasureP FROM a Domain. A later transfer can move funds. That later event is not e2 of this cloth. The FIN page lists afschrijven beside uitbetalen and overmaken as a later payout name. That list is not a second geometry of √DEDUCT, and it is not filed as elicited payout.
• ≠ earmark. Earmark’s Purpose is RESTRICTED_FOR. Deduct’s wegens is JUSTIFIED_BY. No FROM-loss on earmark. No Dutch earmark page is opened here.
• ≠ sell / SWAP. Sell: Recipient HAS goods; Price stays inside a price phrase. Deduct’s object is the decrement. sell·Navajo stays deferred. No Dutch sell page is opened here.
• ≠ Hungarian Focus, ≠ Bulgarian object-stays, ≠ Polish GEN-neg, ≠ German accusative ending. Live Hungarian levon separates le- under Focus or nem and keeps the measure accusative. Live Bulgarian отчислявам has no nominal genitive, so the direct object keeps its form under не. Live Polish odjąć rewrites the measuring QP under nie. Live German abbuchen leaves den Betrag accusative under nicht and spells the Domain as von+DAT. Dutch niet leaves het bedrag in place and leaves van elke rekening in place. There is no dative ending on elke rekening for van to govern. Separable af is V2 morphology, not a Focus host.
• Missing defaults. Destruction, house-credit, guilt, and payout are not entailed. A follow-up that denies those sequels does not deny the decrement. HAS_ON_BOOKS ≠ decrement ≠ debit/OWE ≠ HAVE. Absence of GEN-neg ≠ the definition of deduct.

Shells, ApplP, and Case

1. M1√DEDUCT merges with MeasureP ⟨Amount, Denom⟩
2. M2van+Domain merges with the set
3. M3Voice merges Initiator
4. A4T ↔ Initiator · subject φ · V2 is the T-copy, not a fourth argument
5. A5v ↔ MeasureP · structural object, including under niet (het bedrag, drie bedragen)
6. V6WH fronts; van pied-pipes; waarvan resumes; Amount stays inside MeasureP
7. V7Separable af at the right edge in V2; inside afgeschreven; af te schrijven
8. F8Voice filter · weather ≠ Initiator
9. G9Gold · e2 = decrement · LBC holds · GEN-neg N/A ≠ a new theta and ≠ the definition

VoiceP  [ Initiator = de raad
  (ReasonP)  [ wegens de drempel ]   // optional, outer
  ApplP_FROM  [ van elke rekening ]
    VP  [ √DEDUCT   [ MeasureP  [ Amount 0,3 ] [ N ETH ] ] ]
]
— the MeasureP is the structural object (het bedrag / drie bedragen / 0,3 ETH)
— van spells the Domain; Dutch does not mark elke rekening dative
— that preposition is not GEN-neg
— af is the lemma prefix (schrijft … af / afgeschreven / af te schrijven)

Neg  [ niet ]
  VP  [ afgeschreven ]
— MeasureP keeps its form under niet (het bedrag / drie bedragen)
— decimal 0,3 ETH was never a case ending
— Domain: van elke rekening unchanged
— no second structural object
— af stays inside the participle; it is not a Focus host
— GEN-neg is N/A (Polish tej kwoty is deduct-pl.html)
— German den Betrag vs des Betrages is deduct-de.html
— object-stays under не is Bulgarian (deduct-bg.html), a different reason
— Focus separation of le- is Hungarian (deduct-hu.html), not this field

afschrijven licenses one structural object: the MeasureP. Under niet that object keeps its form. The Domain wears van. There is no frame in which MeasureP and Domain are both bare Themes. No low Appl_HAVE of goods. No √ASCRIBE. No √CHARGE_FEE. High Reason is extra when present. Separable af (schrijft … af, afgeschreven, af te schrijven) is lemma morphology, the same type as FIN’s bij. It is not a Hungarian particle, not FEE’s in rekening, and not a Norwegian stranded-particle diagnostic.

∃e [ DECREMENT(e)
  ∧ INIT(e, raad)
  ∧ DEGREE(e, 0.3) ∧ UNIT(e, ETH)
  ∧ FROM_SET(e, R) ∧ Hom(e, ⟨0.3, ETH⟩)
  ∧ JUSTIFIED_BY(e, Q3) ]   // Reason optional
e2: ⟨0.3, ETH⟩ is off the books of R after e

Underivables (Dutch deduct)

1. * Het slechte weer heeft 0,3 ETH van elke rekening afgeschreven. weather / inanimate as Initiator
2. * Wat het slechte weer gedaan heeft, is 0,3 ETH van elke rekening af te schrijven. do-test · Initiator filter
3. * Hoeveel heeft de raad ETH van elke rekening afgeschreven? LBC · U stranded
4. * Wat heeft de raad 0,3 van elke rekening afgeschreven? LBC · stranded n
5. * De raad heeft elke rekening 0,3 ETH afgeschreven. IO ≠ FROM · use bijschrijven / crediteren for TO
6. * De raad heeft 0,3 ETH van elke rekening bijgeschreven. FIN verb + FROM Domain · already starred on credit-fin-nl
7. * De raad heeft 0,3 ETH en elke rekening afgeschreven. no DOC of MeasureP + Domain as two bare Themes
8. * De raad heeft niet af 0,3 ETH van elke rekening geschreven. af does not split out of the participle
9. * De raad heeft 0,3 ETH van elke rekening voor een bitcoin afgeschreven. voor ≠ Reason · FEE Consideration
10. * Elke rekening werd 0,3 ETH afgeschreven. van-Domain does not promote
11. * Elke rekening kreeg 0,3 ETH afgeschreven. no krijgen-passive of this Domain
12. * Van welke heeft de raad rekening 0,3 ETH afgeschreven? van does not strand the noun
13. * Waar heeft de raad 0,3 ETH van afgeschreven? waarvan does not strand van
14. * De raad heeft de aannemer 0,3 ETH van elke rekening toegeschreven. ATT/MERIT verb + decrement MeasureP hybrid
15. ✓ institution / contract as Initiator: Het slimme contract heeft 0,3 ETH van elke rekening afgeschreven. book-keeper fine

N/A · not Dutch deduct diagnostics

Sibling deduct pages omit diagnostics the language does not have. Dutch deduct matches the FIN page’s local cuts: van+Domain, structural MeasureP, no genitive of negation, separable af as lemma morphology, and worden promotion of the MeasureP. krijgen is FIN’s IO promotion. It is not a diagnostic of this van-Domain. Hungarian Focus and prefix separation stay on deduct-hu.html. Bulgarian’s lack of nominal case stays on deduct-bg.html. Polish genitive of negation stays on deduct-pl.html. German von+DAT and the accusative ending on den Betrag stay on deduct-de.html.

• Genitive of negation as a Dutch fact, or as the definition of deduct. N/A. Dutch does not rewrite the MeasureP under niet. The Polish rewrite hits the measuring QP of zapisać and of obciążyć as well as odjąć. √DEDUCT is the decrement. Do not read the missing genitive as the sense, and do not star a German genitive the Dutch page does not write. The FEE page already marks a genitive rewrite of the QP under niet as N/A, with no Dutch genitive string printed.
• van as genitive of negation, or as a dative ending. N/A. elke rekening has the form it has because Dutch full NPs do not show case. van is the Domain preposition in the affirmative and under niet. There is no second genitive to write on the Domain, and there is no German jedem ending to copy.
• Hungarian Focus + nem as a unique preverbal host. N/A. Dutch negation is not a slot that strands a prefix out of the participle. Two or three WH phrases are an open cluster flag, not a Focus-uniqueness reject. Do not mark Wie heeft hoeveel ETH waarvan afgeschreven? ungrammatical on Hungarian grounds. The starred niet af … geschreven string is a fake Focus split, not a Dutch V2 fact.
• Separable af as a Norwegian stranded-particle test, as Hungarian le-, or as FEE’s in rekening. N/A. af is lemma morphology, like FIN bij: right edge in V2 (schrijft … af), inside the participle (afgeschreven), before te (af te schrijven). A subordinate clause keeps it attached (dat … afschrijft). in rekening stays with brengen / gebracht and is not this prefix.
• Hungarian definite versus indefinite conjugation. N/A. heeft afgeschreven does not conjugate for definiteness of the measure.
• krijgen promotion of a van-Domain, or Norwegian få of a dative Domain. N/A. This cloth has no IO Domain. worden promotes the MeasureP. krijgen promotes FIN’s IO Account (Elke rekening kreeg 0,3 ETH bijgeschreven). It does not promote van elke rekening. German bekommen is the same cut on a dative Account, filed on deduct-de.html.
• Romance en / ne. N/A. Quantity is the MeasureP, or a degree WH with the unit bound. waarvan resumes the Domain, not a partitive of the measure.
• Bulgarian absence of GEN-neg as this page’s reason for keeping the MeasureP’s form. N/A. Bulgarian has no nominal case for не to write. Dutch has no genitive-of-negation rule to write. The two “form stays” facts have different reasons. The Bulgarian fact is filed on deduct-bg.html.
• Polish z+GEN, or Polish tej kwoty, or German von+DAT, as this Domain or this MeasureP. N/A. Dutch van does not spell a case ending on the Domain. The MeasureP keeps its form. Those clothes of the same Appl_FROM are filed on deduct-pl.html and deduct-de.html.
• FEE Payer promotion as a deduct cloth. N/A. Dutch FEE leaves Payer Case open. Deduct keeps Domain oblique (van) and does not file a second object. in rekening is the levy’s predicate piece, not this MeasureP.
• IO Account and op+Account as this root’s Domain. N/A. That pair is the TO dual on bijschrijven / crediteren. This root’s ranked Domain is van.
• A filled aftrekken string. N/A as corpus. The lemma is named. The participle is not printed on the FIN or FEE page. Do not read a missing quotation as a second geometry.

NegQ pointer · association sites

Negative questions on deduct keep the decrement map from Negative_Questions_Deduct. They do not invent a fifth theta name, a Charge, or a fee Consideration. niet associates with the MeasureP. That associate keeps its form. The van-Domain stays the book the measure comes from. Reason stays outer wegens. Payout, guilt, and HAS_ON_BOOKS are systematically missing as default Neg targets. The FIN polar string below is the pattern already on that page. The deduct strings are constructed parallels of that negative. Dutch has no ли. The polar question is verb-first. The site treats that finite fronting as the V2 T-copy, not as a fourth argument. The open FIN question about whether NegQ on debiteren copies the ledger map stays on the FIN page. This page’s map is the decrement.

Open items

• aftrekken productivity. Companion lemma named on the FIN open item beside afschrijven. Relative productivity is scout. No filled string is filed, because none was printed. Do not invent a second geometry, an arithmetic-only frame, or a corpus quotation. The separable af on the primary lemma is not a second sense. spec
• A second source preposition. Not ranked beside van. The ranked Domain is the preposition credit-fin-nl.html already rejects for bijschrijven. Do not file another preposition as elicited, and do not star it ungrammatical. spec
• Payout reading of afschrijven. The FIN page lists the lemma among later payout names (uitbetalen / overmaken). That list is not e2 of this cloth and is not a second sense page. Index 2 Payment stays betalen, overmaken.
• Norwegian deduct. Live at deduct-no.html (Done=98). trekke fra / fradrag, the FROM dual of live credit_FIN · godskrive. Closes Group D deduct. Not this page.
• Group D FEE. Stays closed (German, Dutch, Norwegian). This page does not reopen it. FEE’s open Payer Case stays on charge-fee-nl.html.
• Group C deduct, FIN, and FEE. Stay closed. Deduct: levon / terhel (Done=93), отчислявам / удържам (Done=94), odjąć / potrącić (Done=95). FIN: jóváír, zapisać, записа. FEE: felszámol, таксувам, obciążyć / naliczyć. This page continues Group D deduct beside closed Group D FIN and FEE, after German Done=96.
• debiteren. The FIN open item asks whether NegQ on debiteren copies the ledger map. That question stays there. This page does not answer it and does not file a debiteren string.
• Multiple WH. Wie heeft hoeveel ETH waarvan afgeschreven? stays an open cluster flag. Not an elicited ranking, and not Hungarian Focus uniqueness.
• Navajo sell. Still deferred. No credit-merit-bg.html. No credit-merit-pl.html.

Corpus filenames

Primary extract is Lexical_Entry_Deduct_Argument_Structure (Parse B, MeasureP, Appl_FROM, Voice filter, decrement e2) plus WH_Movement_Denominations_Deduct and Negative_Questions_Deduct. The Dutch clothes are the affirmative of the van reject already printed on credit-fin-nl.html (*De raad heeft 0,3 ETH van elke rekening bijgeschreven), beside the printed FIN affirmative De raad heeft elke rekening 0,3 ETH gecrediteerd and the printed op cloth een bedrag bijschrijven op een rekening. The companion lemma aftrekken is the name in that page’s open item. No participle of it is quoted, because none is printed. FEE, ATT, MERIT, and blame contrasts are the strings already on those pages. Group D plate: separable prefix as lemma morphology (the FIN page’s treatment of bij), V2 as a T-copy, R-pronoun waarvan that does not strand van (the cut already stated on blame). Constructed NL frames diagnose packaging. They are not new elicitation, and they are not a corpus quotation of aftrekken. Index 2 Payment remains betalen, overmaken.