credit_FIN · zapisać

Hierarchy

Same inventory as English credit_FIN and the Hungarian twin. Not five-place. Not four sisters of one V. Surface count can name the board, 0,3, ETH, the account, and a Q3 threshold — but Amount and Denomination share one MeasureP, Account is one Recipient / Domain-of-increment, and Reason is high / outer. każdym / każdy quantifies that one Account. It is not an extra argument.

0,3 ETH = one MeasureP. Orthography is not extra arity (Polish decimal comma, the same string already on the ATT and blame pages). Amount and Denomination are both inner arguments of that object. Composition is V(MeasureP), not V(n)(U). Hom(e, ⟨n,U⟩): the increment is measured by degree n on scale U. The uninflected decimal does not display accusative versus genitive. That display is a noun or a counted QP of the same MeasureP. It is not a second theta.

Working hierarchy: Allocator > MeasureP ⟨Amount, Denomination⟩ > Recipient / Account > Reason. Case ranking on zapisać is Allocator (NOM) > MeasureP (ACC; GEN under nie) > Account (na+LOC / na+ACC). Weather still fails Allocator. Payout is still not entailed. HAS_ON_BOOKS ≠ payout.

Polish frames · Case clothes

One lemma, not two roots. zapisać takes accusative MeasureP and Account under na. That is the string already printed on attribute-att-pl.html, and the negative impersonal already printed on blame-pl.html. The prefix za- is part of the lemma. It does not follow the verb. There is no second structural accusative. Do not conflate na+Account with ATT’s dative Target on przypisywać, and do not conflate the accusative MeasureP with blame’s accusative Target. A dative next to zapisać is a different sense of the surface verb (bequest, enrollment). It is not this Account.

1. ✓ Rada zapisała 0,3 ETH na rachunku. printed cloth · ACC MeasureP · na+LOC Account · pfv 3sg fem · attribute-att-pl.html
2. ✓ Rada zapisała 0,3 ETH na rachunek. same Account · na+ACC directional · not a second theta
3. ✓ zapisać kwotę na rachunku infinitive of the printed cloth · constructed
4. ✓ Rada zapisuje 0,3 ETH na rachunku. imperfective zapisywać · same root · not a second sense
5. ✓ Bank zapisał 0,3 ETH na rachunku. Allocator = institution
6. ✓ Izba rozliczeniowa zapisała 0,3 ETH na rachunku. Allocator = institution
7. ✓ Inteligentny kontrakt zapisał 0,3 ETH na rachunku. Allocator = code · constructed
8. ✓ Rada zapisała tę kwotę na rachunku. noun MeasureP · ACC tę kwotę · case is visible · constructed
9. ✓ Rada zapisała 0,3 ETH na każdym rachunku. każdym quantifies the one Account · not an extra argument
10. ✓ Rada zapisała 0,3 ETH na każdy rachunek. same quantifier · directional na+ACC
11. ✓ Rada zapisała 0,3 ETH na rachunku z powodu progu trzeciego kwartału. outer Reason · z powodu · not a second Account
12. ✓ Zapisano 0,3 ETH na rachunku. impersonal -no · MeasureP stays the object · Allocator suppressed
13. ✓ Nie zapisano 0,3 ETH na rachunku. printed on blame-pl.html · GEN-neg host is the MeasureP
14. ✓ Czy nie zapisali 0,3 ETH na rachunku? printed on attribute-att-pl.html · same host
15. ✓ Rada nie zapisała tej kwoty na rachunku. GEN-neg visible · tej kwoty · Account stays na+LOC
16. ✓ Ta kwota została zapisana na rachunku. zostać promotes the MeasureP · Account stays under na
17. ✓ ATT contrast: Rada przypisała opóźnienie wykonawcy. ATT · ACC = Charge · DAT Target · attribute-att-pl.html
18. ✓ blame contrast: Komisja obwiniała wykonawcę o opóźnienie. blame · ACC = Target · blame-pl.html
19. * Rada zapisała rachunek 0,3 ETH. no DOC of MeasureP + Account as two bare ACC Themes
20. * Rada zapisała 0,3 ETH i rachunek. no coordination of two bare Themes
21. * Rada zapisała rachunkowi 0,3 ETH. dative Account not filed · not Hungarian -nak · bequest dative is a different sense
22. * Rada nie pisała za 0,3 ETH na rachunku. za- does not separate · not Hungarian jóvá-
23. * Rada zapisała rachunek kwotą 0,3 ETH. instrumental amount not filed · MeasureP stays the accusative object
24. * Zła pogoda zapisała 0,3 ETH na rachunku. weather ≠ Allocator
25. * Rada zapisała 0,3 ETH z rachunku. z+GEN Account = deduct / odjąć / potrącić, not TO
26. * Rada nie zapisała tej kwoty rachunku. GEN-neg does not eat the Account · na stays

MeasureP WH / LBC

Unlike attribute_ATT and blame, credit_FIN has a verbal MeasureP. Amount and Denomination compose one measure object. Whole-QP pied-piping is free under Neg. Amount-only is free when the unit is bound. Left-branch extraction of Amount leaving the unit next to the verb is still out — same LBC record as deduct / sell / charge_FEE and the live credit_FIN twins. na pied-pipes with the Account. It does not split the MeasureP, and it does not strand. There is no Hungarian preverbal Focus slot, so WH fronting is not a second host competing with a particle.

1. ✓ Ile ETH zapisała rada na rachunku? whole MeasureP
2. ✓ Ile zapisała rada na rachunku? degree WH · U bound
3. ✓ Na którym rachunku zapisała rada 0,3 ETH? na+LOC Account WH · whole PP
4. ✓ Na który rachunek zapisała rada 0,3 ETH? na+ACC Account WH · same book
5. ✓ Kto zapisał 0,3 ETH na rachunku? Allocator WH
6. ✓ Co zapisała rada na rachunku? whole MeasureP as co
7. ✓ Kto ile ETH na którym rachunku zapisał? cluster hypothesis · not a ranked elicitation · same honesty as ATT-pl
8. * Ile zapisała rada ETH na rachunku? LBC · U stranded
9. * Ile zapisała ETH rada na rachunku? LBC · unit left beside the verb
10. * Co zapisała rada 0,3 na rachunku? what hijacks the object · stranded n
11. ✓ ATT pointer: Co przypisała rada wykonawcy? WH = Charge · not MeasureP · przypisywać
12. * Ile ETH przypisała rada wykonawcy? unless Charge recoded as a share

Superiority ranks Allocator > MeasureP > na-Account > outer Reason. Amount and Denomination never compete as two verbal WH-items. Cheap NegQ association tracks the MeasureP. Challenging the Account wants that book already in the associate, under na. Multiple WH fronting stays an open Group C flag. It is not an elicited superiority paradigm, and it is not Hungarian Focus uniqueness.

GEN-neg · the measuring QP · the cut Hungarian does not host

Polish genitive of negation rewrites an accusative direct object under sentential nie. On this root the direct object is the MeasureP. The rewrite is the same MeasureP in the genitive. It is not a fifth theta, not a new Account, and not a change of who the Allocator is. Live Hungarian jóváír keeps ETH-t accusative under nem and rejects ETH-nek. That rejection is Hungarian. It is not imported here, and this rewrite is not exported back onto Hungarian.

The printed decimal does not spell the case. 0,3 ETH looks the same in Rada zapisała 0,3 ETH na rachunku and in Nie zapisano 0,3 ETH na rachunku. Those strings are already on the live ATT and blame pages, and they remain the GEN-neg host. The ending is visible on a noun and on a counted QP. na+LOC and na+ACC stay on the Account under negation. Genitive of negation does not replace na.

1. ✓ Rada zapisała tę kwotę na rachunku. affirmative · ACC tę kwotę · constructed visible case
2. ✓ Rada nie zapisała tej kwoty na rachunku. GEN-neg · tej kwoty · same MeasureP · Account stays na+LOC
3. ✓ Rada zapisała trzy tokeny na rachunek. counted QP · ACC · directional Account · constructed
4. ✓ Rada nie zapisała trzech tokenów na rachunek. GEN on the whole QP · unit inside the QP · not stranded · Account stays na+ACC
5. ✓ Nie zapisano 0,3 ETH na rachunku. printed impersonal · decimal does not spell the ending · still the MeasureP host
6. ✓ Czy nie zapisali 0,3 ETH na rachunku? printed polar · same host · attribute-att-pl.html
7. ✓ Rada nie zapisała 0,3 ETH na rachunku. personal nie · prefix stays · Account not rewritten
8. ✓ Na którym rachunku rada nie zapisała tej kwoty? Account associate · MeasureP still GEN
9. * Rada nie zapisała tę kwotę na rachunku. accusative MeasureP left under nie · the rewrite is the diagnostic
10. * Rada nie zapisała trzech na rachunku tokenów. LBC under Neg · unit stranded out of the QP
11. * Rada nie zapisała tej kwoty rachunku. Account is not the genitive object
12. * Rada nie zapisała tej kwoty na rachunku ETH. stranded denomination beside a rewritten noun
13. ✓ ATT parallel, not this rule: Czy nie przypisali wczesne ukończenie wykonawcy? ATT Charge is not the measuring QP · attribute-att-pl.html
14. ✓ blame parallel, not this rule: Czy nie obwiniali wykonawcę o opóźnienie? blame Target is not the measuring QP · blame-pl.html
15. ✓ HU parallel, the cut this page does not copy backward: A tanács nem írt jóvá minden számlának 0,3 ETH-t. accusative stays · credit-fin-hu.html

A bare nie challenges the increment. The genitive is how Polish spells the challenged MeasureP when the object inflects. It does not grow a double object, does not turn the account into a second accusative, and does not turn na rachunku into a bare genitive rachunku. ATT’s working-paper NegQ keeps accusative on Charge. Blame’s working-paper NegQ keeps accusative on Target. Those pages already say the measuring-QP rewrite belongs here. This page is that host. Ordinary genitive of negation on other accusatives of other verbs is not re-elicited. The claim is the MeasureP of √CREDIT_LEDGER.

Geometry · credit_FIN ≠ attribute_ATT ≠ blame ≠ deduct ≠ payer

In Rada zapisała 0,3 ETH na rachunku, the board writes 0,3 ETH onto the account’s book. That is ledger INCREMENT, not ascription and not HAVE of goods. The account is Account. 0,3 ETH is MeasureP. HAS_ON_BOOKS holds after the event; spendability / payout is not entailed. na rachunek names the same writing as a direction. It does not add a recipient of goods.

• ≠ attribute_ATT / przypisywać. ATT is content-ascribe: accusative Charge + dative Target (przypisała opóźnienie wykonawcy), polarity open, light-noun przypisanie when a noun is used. ATT has no MeasureP and no Account. GEN-neg is not applied to ATT Charge on the live page. Live twin: attribute-att-pl.html.
• ≠ blame / obwiniać / winić. Blame ascribes fault. Its accusative is the Target; Charge wears za / o / za to, że. FIN’s accusative is MeasureP; FIN’s Account wears na. Blame’s working-paper negation does not rewrite the Target/Charge association. Blame stays on obwiniać / winić.
• ≠ MERIT. No Polish merit micro-entry. Index 2 does not print a merit root on the Polish Attitude line. Do not invent credit-merit-pl.html. Do not import Hungarian elismer as this lemma. A quantified Charge on przypisywać can look MeasureP-shaped and still be ascription. Diagnostics: replaceable by ascribe, not by this deposit; weather can sit as an ATT Target and cannot sit as a FIN Allocator.
• ≠ deduct. Shared MeasureP. Opposite polarity: deduct = FROM_SET decrement; credit_FIN = TO_SET increment. z+GEN on the account yields odjąć / potrącić / deduct, not TO (*zapisała 0,3 ETH z rachunku). Live twin: deduct.html. No Polish deduct page this tick. The same GEN-neg hits a deduct QP. That does not make decrement this root.
• ≠ płacić / przelewać / pay_GIVE. Index 2 Payment cites those two verbs. Pay writes MeasureP with Recipient HAVE. FIN’s HAS_ON_BOOKS is weaker; payout is a later verb (wypłacić / obciążyć / przelać). przelać can cause a credit onto another account; that does not make przelewać this root.
• ≠ attribute_XFER. Shared CREDIT_LEDGER family. Polish ledger packaging for this tick is zapisać, not a second XFER page. XFER stays at attribute-xfer.html.
• ≠ the other senses of zapisać. Bequest (zapisać komuś majątek) is dative + accusative goods. Enrollment (zapisać kogoś na kurs) is an accusative person. Neither is √CREDIT_LEDGER. Neither is filed as a second geometry of this page.
• ≠ separable jóvá- / separable gut / bound god- as the Polish default. Hungarian jóvá- leaves the stem under Focus or nem. German strands gut in ordinary V2. Norwegian god- never leaves the stem, and bli promotes the MeasureP. Polish za- also stays bound, but the local cut is GEN-neg, not promotion-by-få and not a Focus host. Do not import the Hungarian separation as the Polish negative.
• ≠ Bulgarian записа as a Polish cloth. Live at credit-fin-bg.html. Printed Съветът записа 0,3 ETH по сметката (по+Account). Bulgarian has no genitive of negation. Do not export this page’s rewrite onto that cloth, and do not import по as Polish na.
• Missing defaults. Payout and spendability are not entailed. A later debit can reverse the book without making the original credit event false. HAS_ON_BOOKS ≠ physical HAVE ≠ RESTRICTED_FOR.

Shells, ApplP, and Case

1. M1√CREDIT_LEDGER merges with MeasureP ⟨Amount, Denom⟩
2. M2na+LOC / na+ACC merges with Account
3. M3Voice merges Allocator
4. A4T ↔ Allocator · NOM + φ
5. A5v ↔ MeasureP · ACC, or GEN under nie (same object)
6. V6WH fronts; na pied-pipes; Amount stays inside MeasureP
7. V7Prefix za- stays on the stem
8. F8Voice filter · weather ≠ Allocator
9. G9Gold · HAS_ON_BOOKS ≠ payout · LBC holds · GEN-neg ≠ new theta

VoiceP  [ Allocator = rada
  (ReasonP)  [ z powodu progu ]   // optional, outer
  ApplP_TO / book-Rec  [ na+LOC rachunku   or   na+ACC rachunek ]
    VP  [ √CREDIT_LEDGER   [ MeasureP  [ Amount 0,3 ] [ N ETH ] ] ]
]
— na+ACC is P’s case, not a second verbal accusative
— GEN under nie replaces ACC on the MeasureP only

Neg  [ nie ]
  VP  [ zapisała   [ za- stays ] ]
— MeasureP: ACC → GEN (tej kwoty / trzech tokenów)
— Account: na+LOC / na+ACC unchanged
— no second structural accusative
— no stranding of za-

zapisać assigns one structural accusative: the MeasureP. Under nie that same object is genitive. The Account wears na. There is no frame in which MeasureP and Account are both bare accusative Themes. No low Appl_HAVE of goods. No low Appl_SWAP. No √ASCRIBE. High Appl / Affectee / outer Reason is extra when present. The prefix is lemma morphology (zapisać, zapisała, zapisano, zapisana, and imperfective zapisywać). It is not a Hungarian particle and it is not a German particle that strands in every main clause.

∃e [ INCREMENT(e)
  ∧ INIT(e, rada)
  ∧ DEGREE(e, 0.3) ∧ UNIT(e, ETH)
  ∧ TO_SET(e, R) ∧ Hom(e, ⟨0.3, ETH⟩)
  ∧ JUSTIFIED_BY(e, Q3) ]   // Reason optional
result: ∀y ∈ R. HAS_ON_BOOKS(y, ⟨0.3, ETH⟩) after e

Underivables (Polish FIN)

1. * Zła pogoda zapisała 0,3 ETH na rachunku. weather / inanimate as Allocator
2. * To, co zrobiła zła pogoda, to zapisać 0,3 ETH na rachunku. do-test · Allocator filter
3. * Ile zapisała rada ETH na rachunku? LBC · U stranded
4. * Co zapisała rada 0,3 na rachunku? LBC · stranded n
5. * Rada zapisała 0,3 ETH z rachunku. z+GEN ≠ TO · use odjąć / potrącić / deduct
6. * Rada zapisała złej pogodzie 0,3 ETH. dative cause ≠ Account · bequest dative is not this cloth
7. * Rada przypisała wykonawcy 0,3 ETH na rachunku. ATT cloth + FIN MeasureP hybrid
8. * Inteligentny kontrakt przypisał wykonawcy wczesne ukończenie. system Allocator ≠ ATT Judge (coerced)
9. * Rada zapisała rachunek 0,3 ETH. no DOC of MeasureP + Account as two bare ACC Themes
10. * Rada nie zapisała tę kwotę na rachunku. GEN-neg · accusative MeasureP does not survive nie
11. * Rada nie pisała za tej kwoty na rachunku. prefix does not separate under Neg
12. * Rachunek został zapisany 0,3 ETH. na-Account does not promote
13. ✓ institution / contract as Allocator: Inteligentny kontrakt zapisał 0,3 ETH na rachunku. book-keeper fine

N/A · not Polish FIN diagnostics

Sibling FIN pages omit diagnostics the language does not have. Polish FIN matches that list, with the local cuts filed above: na+LOC beside na+ACC, GEN-neg on the MeasureP, bound za-, and zostać versus impersonal -no.

• Hungarian Focus + nem as a unique preverbal host. N/A. Polish negation is not a slot that strands a prefix, and two WH phrases are an open cluster flag, not a Focus-uniqueness reject. Do not mark Kto ile… ungrammatical on Hungarian grounds.
• Hungarian prefix separation / German V2 strand of gut / Dutch bij. N/A. za- stays on zapisać in the affirmative and under nie. There is no particle za to omit, and there is no V2 strand in every main clause.
• Hungarian definite versus indefinite conjugation. N/A. zapisała agrees with the Allocator (rada), not with definiteness of the measure.
• Norwegian få / Dutch krijgen promotion of a dative Account. N/A. There is no dative Account on this cloth. zostać promotes the MeasureP. Impersonal zapisano keeps the object. The na-Account does not raise.
• Romance en / ne. N/A. Quantity is the accusative MeasureP, the genitive of that same object under nie, or a degree WH with the unit bound.
• Bulgarian absence of GEN-neg. N/A as a Polish fact. Live записа keeps the direct object under не. That stability is not a reason to leave Polish accusative MeasureP under nie.

NegQ pointer · association sites

Negative questions on credit_FIN keep the FIN map. They do not invent a fifth theta name and they do not create a Charge. nie associates with the MeasureP, and genitive of negation is the spell-out of that associate when the object inflects. The na-Account stays the book. Reason stays outer. Payout / spendability is systematically missing as a default Neg target — same moral as bet’s missing settlement. Two of the strings below are already printed as contrast on the live ATT and blame pages.

Open items

• Bulgarian FIN. Live at credit-fin-bg.html (записа; printed Съветът записа 0,3 ETH по сметката). Beyond Index 2. по+Account. Bulgarian does not host this page’s GEN-neg. Do not invent credit-merit-bg.html.
• zaksięgować / księgować. Banker companions. Not the primary lemma. Not ranked as a second geometry. The queue’s lemma is zapisać.
• zapis / zapisanie. Event noun. Relative naturalness against the verb is scout-leaning. Possessor agreement is not ranked. Not a second root.
• Bequest and enrollment. zapisać komuś majątek and zapisać kogoś na kurs are other senses of the surface verb. They are not filed as Account clothes of √CREDIT_LEDGER. spec
• Locative versus directional na. Both are filed as one Account. A speaker preference for one of them in ledger Polish is not ranked as two roots. The printed pointer is locative.
• Polish deduct. FROM dual still English-primary at deduct. odjąć / potrącić are not this tick. GEN-neg on their QP is the same case rule, not this verb.
• Debit as named dual. Does NegQ on a debit verb copy the FIN map with polarity flipped? Prediction: no merit debit, and no Polish merit page.
• Hybrid QP Charge. Controlled discrimination of a quantified Charge on przypisywać versus a true FIN MeasureP on zapisać — the lexical entry’s speaker check, not a second Polish page.
• Multiple WH. Kto ile ETH na którym rachunku zapisał? stays an open cluster flag, parallel to the ATT page. Not an elicited ranking.
• Navajo sell. Still deferred. No new blame language. No credit_MERIT Bulgarian or Polish page.

Corpus filenames

Primary extract for this micro-entry is the FIN half of Lexical_Entry_Credit_Argument_Structure (frames §3.2, Voice §4.1, MeasureP WH §5.2, shells §7.2) plus FIN NegQ association from Negative_Questions_Credit. Printed clothes: the contrast string already on attribute-att-pl.html (Rada zapisała 0,3 ETH na rachunku; Czy nie zapisali 0,3 ETH na rachunku?) and on blame-pl.html (Nie zapisano 0,3 ETH na rachunku). GEN-neg plate: Attribute_GroupC_Larson_Shells (chat 04 · PL GEN-neg on a measuring QP, beside HU Focus). The Hungarian twin refuses that rewrite; this page is where the rewrite is filed. Decrement dual: Lexical_Entry_Deduct_Argument_Structure. Chat packaging: Tritransitive chats 23 (NegQ on credit · two-root · Groups A–D), 25 (credit attitude vs transfer), and 35 (credit argument-structure acceptability). Index 2 Vols. 3, 6: Polish Attitude = obwiniać / winić, przypisywać. Index 2 Payment = płacić, przelewać — not this lemma.