Working paper. Japanese-only micro-entry from Tritransitive NegQ Credit §12 Group A remainder (Negative_Questions_Credit), sharing √CREDIT_LEDGER geometry with Lexical_Entry_Credit_Argument_Structure and the English stub credit-fin.html. Constructed diagnostics diagnose particles, MeasureP / floating counters, Voice filter, and the FIN / MERIT root split; they are not spontaneous-speech citations. Mandarin / Navajo companions in the same DOCX are pointed only — this tick does not deepen them. English credit-fin.html is now a live EN micro-entry (deepened in a later tick).
Constructed examples. Frames below are packaging hypotheses aligned with Volume 4 Group A notes and chat 23 (“Japanese keeps ACC vs に”). HAS_ON_BOOKS after the event is e2. Payout / spendability is not entailed — same missing settlement default as English creditFIN and as bet. Do not fake elicitation. Scout-leaning forms are flagged.
Class table. Index 2 does not list Japanese under Payment, and it does not list a financial credit verb as a separate Index 2 lemma (English credit is filed under Attitude). Like sell · Japanese and chargeFEE · Japanese, this root sits Beyond Index 2 as a Group A remainder sense×language page. Neighbouring Index 2 classes (Risk / kakeru) are not a translation of creditFIN.
Scout / deferred. Mandarin 打入 / 入账 and Navajo BOOK / HANDLE packaging share the Group A DOCX but are not micro-entries this tick. Relative productivity of 計上する / 付与する vs primary 入金する is scout-leaning where the extract lists forms without ranking them. Floating-counter split under -nakatta (N from Num+#) is logged from MeasureP_Japanese_Counters as open confirmation, not closed elicitation. No fake elicitation.

Hierarchy

Same inventory as English creditFIN. Not five-place. Not four sisters of one V. Surface count can name the board, 0.3, ETH, each wallet, and a Q3 threshold — but Amount and Denomination share one Case object, Account is one ni-DP, and Reason is high / outer.

Intended labeling (shared English metalanguage)

√CREDIT_LEDGER / INCREMENT + VoiceA(Allocator) + MeasureP ⟨Amount, Denom⟩ + ApplTO(Recipient / Account)  ·  hierarchy Allocator > MeasureP > Rec/Account (> outer Reason)

Voice introduces Allocator (authority over a ledger — board, bank, smart contract). MeasureP ⟨n, U⟩ is Incremental Theme of the increment — one ACC (o) object, Japanese #P with Amount in Spec and #° the unit. Low Appl_TO / book-Recipient introduces Account as ni. Optional high for-Reason / purpose PP is outer justification of the increment, not Charge of MERIT and not Purpose of earmark’s RESTRICT. Light-noun / light-verb packaging (入金する, 計上する, 付与する) keeps one ledger geometry.

0.3 ETH = one MeasureP. Orthography / #P morphology is not extra arity. Amount and Denomination are both inner arguments of that object. Composition is V(#P), not V(n)(U). Hom(e, ⟨n,U⟩): the increment is measured by degree n on scale U. Floating counters under negation still split N from Num+# — they do not split Amount from unit as two verbal sisters (MeasureP_Japanese_Counters).

What Group A Japanese changes is particle cloth and the already-split MERIT vs FIN roots. What it does not change is the inventory. Weather still fails Allocator. Payout is still not entailed. Account and MeasureP still flip rank only by Case cloth (English to/with; Japanese default keeps MeasureP ACC and Account ni). Double-o is unused by Domain or Account on either root.

Japanese frames · Case clothes

Japanese already splits the roots in the lexicon: MERIT 功績を認める / 〜の手柄にする / 帰する versus FIN 入金する / 計上する / 付与する. NegQ under -nakatta ka keeps ACC on MeasureP (FIN) or Charge (MERIT) and ni on Recipient (FIN) or Target (MERIT). This tick deepens FIN only; MERIT strings are pointer contrast (already live at credit-merit-ja.html).

Primary lemma for the page: 入金する / nyūkin-suru. Companions 計上する / keijō-suru and 付与する / fuyo-suru are packaging variants of one FIN geometry — not three roots invented here. Scout-leaning: relative frequency / productivity of the companions vs 入金する is not ranked in the extract.

  1. ✓ 理事会は各ウォレットに 0.3 ETH を入金した。 canonical · ACC MeasureP · ni Account
  2. ✓ 理事会は各ウォレットに 0.3 ETH を入金しなかったのか。 attested NegQ FIN (§12)
  3. ✓ 0.3 ETH を各ウォレットに計上した。 keijō companion · same geometry
  4. ✓ 各ウォレットに 0.3 ETH を付与した。 fuyo companion · scout-leaning productivity
  5. ✓ スマートコントラクトが各ウォレットに 0.3 ETH を入金した。 Allocator = institution / contract · fine
  6. ✓ MERIT pointer only: 投資家は早期完成を請負業者に功績として認めなかったのか。 MERIT NegQ · do not deepen
  7. * 天気は各ウォレットに 0.3 ETH を入金しなかったのか。 weather as Allocator
  8. * 理事会は各ウォレットを 0.3 ETH を入金した。 no productive Double-o DOC
  9. * 理事会は請負業者に早期完成を入金しなかったのか。 MERIT Charge ≠ FIN MeasureP

NegQ baseline (Japanese map · Group A §12)

✓ 理事会は各ウォレットに 0.3 ETH を入金しなかったのか。

✓ 何を各ウォレットに入金しなかったのか。 WH = MeasureP (ACC)

✓ どこに / どのウォレットに 0.3 ETH を入金しなかったのか。 WH = Account (ni)

✓ 誰が各ウォレットに 0.3 ETH を入金しなかったのか。 WH = Allocator

✓ MERIT contrast (pointer): 投資家は早期完成を請負業者に功績として認めなかったのか。

* 天気は各ウォレットに 0.3 ETH を入金しなかったのか。

A bare negative answer on the canonical NegQ most readily challenges the increment event or the ACC MeasureP. Challenging the Account wants that book already under discussion. Negation does not grow a double-object and does not create a Charge on FIN. INCREMENT updates the book; it does not entail payout.

MeasureP WH / NegQ · LBC and floating counters

Unlike creditMERIT, creditFIN has a verbal MeasureP. Amount and Denomination compose one Case object. Whole-#P pied-piping is free under Neg. Amount-only is free when the unit is bound. Left-branch extraction of Amount leaving the unit next to V is still out — same LBC the English FIN map and the deduct / sell notes record. Bare 何 cannot take the unit and leave the degree in situ without Abney-side rescue.

  1. ✓ 何を各ウォレットに入金しなかったのか。 WH = MeasureP whole
  2. ✓ いくら各ウォレットに入金しなかったのか。 degree WH · U bound / recoverable
  3. ✓ どれだけの ETH を各ウォレットに入金しなかったのか。 Amount+unit as one #P
  4. ✓ どこに 0.3 ETH を入金しなかったのか。 WH = Account
  5. ✓ 誰が各ウォレットに 0.3 ETH を入金しなかったのか。 WH = Allocator
  6. * いくら ETH を各ウォレットに入金しなかったのか。 LBC-style strand · Amount leaving unit · English *How much … ETH; JA float confirmation open
  7. * 天気は各ウォレットに 0.3 ETH を入金しなかったのか。 weather ≠ Allocator
  8. ✓ MERIT pointer: 何を請負業者に功績として認めなかったのか。 WH = Charge · not MeasureP

Floating counters under -nakatta (open confirmation)

Group A open item: Japanese floating counters under -nakatta on 入金する should still split N from Num+# rather than Amount from unit — the MeasureP_Japanese_Counters note. This tick logs the prediction; it does not invent a closed elicitation paradigm. Double-o remains unused by Domain or Account.

Superiority ranks Allocator > MeasureP > Account (to-frame order of the shared metalanguage; English with-frame flips ACC to Account — Japanese default keeps MeasureP ACC). Cheap NegQ association tracks the Case object: ACC MeasureP under 入金する.

o-MeasureP ≠ MERIT Charge · ni-Account ≠ MERIT Target

を MeasureP = quantized ledger increment — not Charge content, not sell Price alone, not blame Target. に Account = book / wallet / Recipient-as-account-holder — not MERIT ascribee, not bet Platform, not sell Recipient HAVE. Chat 23: ACC vs に is the particle spelling of the MERIT / FIN Case split under one operator family.

Geometry · nyūkin ≠ mitomeru ≠ kōjo ≠ uru

In 理事会は各ウォレットに 0.3 ETH を入金した, the board writes 0.3 ETH onto each wallet’s book. That is ledger INCREMENT, not ascription and not HAVE of goods. The wallet is Account. 0.3 ETH is MeasureP. HAS_ON_BOOKS holds after the event; spendability / payout is not entailed.

English twin pointer only (not deepened this tick): to-frame MeasureP ACC / Account to; with-frame Account ACC / MeasureP with. Weather out as Allocator. Japanese spells the default as MeasureP o + Account ni; there is no productive with-flip of the English FIN type as a second Case object, and no Double-o DOC cloth.

Shells, ApplP, and Case

Base tree (ledger-increment · Japanese cloth)

VoiceP  [ AllocatorNOM / ga
  vP / √CREDIT_LEDGER
    ACC / o-marked    MeasureP ⟨n, U⟩   (0.3 ETH …)
    PP_ni             Account / Rec     (各ウォレットに)
    (high Reason)     outer justification
]

Light-noun companions (same geometry):
  入金する · 計上する · 付与する
  — packaging variants, not three invented roots

Japanese FIN never assigns four structural Cases. MeasureP is o; Account is ni. Low Appl_TO / book-Recipient is available (Account as applied individual). No low ApplHAVE of goods. No low ApplSWAP. No √ASCRIBE. High Appl / Affectee / outer Reason is extra when present and is not a listed inner argument of √CREDIT_LEDGER. Each investor’s wallet is a DP-internal container on the Recipient — Abney restrictor, not a fourth verbal Location.

Outer CAUSEG (〜させる) over the FIN root is Type A wrap: outer Neg denies the causing; the causee, not the weather, is the Allocator. Clitic-climbing analogues under Neg diagnose Type A union only when that outer CAUSE wraps FIN; they do not fuse MERIT Charge with FIN MeasureP.

Omission does not demote MeasureP to a pure adjunct. Selected P-layers are optional in the numeration; they are still arguments when present. The diagnostic is participanthood under Case, binding, and WH — not omitability.

Type A · 〜させる wrap

✓ 上司は理事会に各ウォレットへ 0.3 ETH を入金させなかったのか。 outer Neg denies causing

* 上司は天気に各ウォレットへ 0.3 ETH を入金させなかったのか。 weather still not inner Allocator

Underivables (Japanese FIN)

  1. * 天気は各ウォレットに 0.3 ETH を入金しなかったのか。 weather / inanimate as Allocator
  2. * 上司は天気に各ウォレットへ 0.3 ETH を入金させなかったのか。 〜させる does not wash Voice filter
  3. * 理事会は各ウォレットを 0.3 ETH を入金した。 no productive Double-o DOC
  4. * 理事会は請負業者に早期完成を入金しなかったのか。 MERIT Charge ≠ FIN MeasureP
  5. * 理事会は各ウォレットに功績として 0.3 ETH を認めなかったのか。 FIN MeasureP ≠ MERIT Charge cloth
  6. * 理事会は 0.3 ETH を各ウォレットと交換しなかったのか。 SWAP cloth ≠ ledger increment
  7. ✓ institution / contract as Allocator: スマートコントラクトが各ウォレットに 0.3 ETH を入金した。 book-keeper fine

Group A packaging · this tick Japanese only

Group A remainder (Japanese, Mandarin, Navajo) is the packaging contrast set already used for NegQ on credit (§12). Same hierarchy as English creditFIN; different host of MeasureP/Account Case and already-split MERIT vs FIN roots in Japanese. This tick is Japanese FIN only. Mandarin 把 0.3 ETH 打入每个钱包 (把 fronts MeasureP of FIN; 没 / 没有 over that object) and Navajo BOOK / HANDLE packaging share the DOCX and may be briefly pointed; full sense×language pages for those languages are later queue ticks. MERIT Japanese (功績を認める / 手柄にする / 帰する) is already live — pointer contrast, not re-deepened this tick. English creditFIN is now deepened as a separate sense×language tick.

Open items

Corpus filenames

Primary extract for this micro-entry is Group A remainder NegQ on credit (§12 Japanese FIN string 理事会は各ウォレットに 0.3 ETH を入金しなかったのか). Geometry is shared with the English lexical entry. Chat packaging: Tritransitive chats 23 (NegQ on credit · two-root · “Japanese keeps ACC vs に”), 25 (credit attitude vs transfer), and 35 (credit argument-structure acceptability). MeasureP float: MeasureP_Japanese_Counters. Decrement dual: Lexical_Entry_Deduct_Argument_Structure.

Series placement: Japanese sense×language twin of English creditFIN EN micro-entry. Feeds Payment / measuring companions Beyond Index 2 and the ledger-increment cell next to deduct / chargeFEE / attributeXFER. Sister of live creditMERIT · Japanese — keep the FIN/MERIT split. Does not invent ZH/NV/EN-FIN elicitation. Speculation flagged.