Working paper.
Hungarian micro-entry opening Group C FIN after Group D closed on live
Norwegian godskrive (Done=83), following
German gutschreiben and
Dutch bijschrijven / crediteren. Geometry from
Lexical_Entry_Credit_Argument_Structure (FIN half) and NegQ association maps from
Negative_Questions_Credit, sharing √CREDIT_LEDGER with the live English, Germanic, Romance, Japanese, and Mandarin twins and the FROM dual
deduct. Focus uniqueness is the Group C shell plate already used on
creditMERIT · elismer,
attributeATT · tulajdonít, and
blame · hibáztat / okol. Constructed diagnostics diagnose the printed clothes (DAT Account + ACC MeasureP), prefix separation, MeasureP integrity, the Allocator filter, and the FIN / MERIT / ATT / blame split. They are not spontaneous-speech citations. The string already printed as contrast on those three pages is
A tanács minden számlának 0,3 ETH-t jóváírt.
Constructed examples.
Frames below are packaging hypotheses aligned with that printed string, with the Focus+nem contrast already printed beside it (Nem 0,3 ETH-t írtak jóvá minden számlának?), and with the lexical entry’s §3.2 / §5 / §7.2. HAS_ON_BOOKS after the event is e2. Payout / spendability is not entailed — same missing settlement default as English creditFIN. Do not fake elicitation. Indefinite conjugation on the printed string (jóváírt) is object definiteness of an indefinite measure, not a second argument. A definite measure takes jóváírta / írta jóvá.
Class table · FIN / MERIT / ATT / blame split (named roots).
Index 2 lists Hungarian Attitude as
hibáztat, okol, tulajdonít, elismer, jóváír (Vols. 3, 6). The ledger reading of
jóváír is this page. MERIT stays on
elismer at
creditMERIT · Hungarian. Content-ascribe stays on
tulajdonít at
attributeATT · Hungarian. Fault stays on
hibáztat / okol. Dative
-nak/-nek marks Account here and Target on MERIT and ATT. Same case letters are not the same licenser. Index 2 Payment cites
fizet, átutal — not this root. FIN has MeasureP and Account. MERIT, ATT, and blame have neither.
Scout / deferred.
Noun
jóváírás shares ledger talk; relative productivity against the verb is scout-leaning and is not ranked. An instrumental amount on an accusative account is not the printed cloth and is not ranked as a second geometry. Polish
zapisać is live at
credit-fin-pl.html (printed
Rada zapisała 0,3 ETH na rachunku; GEN-neg on the measuring QP is filed there, not here). Bulgarian
записа is live at
credit-fin-bg.html (printed
Съветът записа 0,3 ETH по сметката;
по+Account; no GEN-neg and no Focus). No
credit-merit-bg.html and no
credit-merit-pl.html. sell·Navajo stays deferred. No fake elicitation.
Hierarchy
Same inventory as English creditFIN and the Germanic twins. Not five-place. Not four sisters of one V. Surface count can name the board, 0,3, ETH, the account, and a Q3 threshold — but Amount and Denomination share one MeasureP, Account is one Recipient / Domain-of-increment, and Reason is high / outer. minden quantifies that one Account. It is not an extra argument.
Intended labeling (shared English metalanguage)
√CREDIT_LEDGER / INCREMENT + VoiceA(Allocator) + MeasureP ⟨Amount, Denom⟩ + ApplTO(Recipient / Account) · hierarchy Allocator > MeasureP > Rec/Account (> outer Reason)
Voice introduces Allocator (authority over a ledger — bank, board, smart contract, clearing house). MeasureP ⟨n, U⟩ is Incremental Theme of the increment — one measure object (Amount in Spec, Denomination as N). Low Appl_TO / book-Recipient introduces Account. Optional high miatt-Reason is outer justification of the increment, not Charge of MERIT and not Purpose of earmark’s RESTRICT. Hungarian clothes put Account in the dative (számlának) and the MeasureP in the accusative (ETH-t). They do not add a DOC of two bare accusative Themes, and they do not copy MERIT’s dative Target onto this root.
0,3 ETH = one MeasureP. Orthography is not extra arity (Hungarian decimal comma, the same string already on the MERIT, ATT, and blame pages). The accusative -t sits on the denomination head. Amount and Denomination are both inner arguments of that object. Composition is V(MeasureP), not V(n)(U). Hom(e, ⟨n,U⟩): the increment is measured by degree n on scale U.
Working hierarchy: Allocator > MeasureP ⟨Amount, Denomination⟩ > Recipient / Account > Reason. Case ranking on jóváír is Allocator (NOM) > MeasureP (ACC) > Account (DAT). Weather still fails Allocator. Payout is still not entailed. HAS_ON_BOOKS ≠ payout.
Hungarian frames · Case clothes
One lemma, not two roots. jóváír takes accusative MeasureP and dative Account. That is the string already printed on credit-merit-hu.html, attribute-att-hu.html, and blame-hu.html. The prefix jóvá- is part of the lemma (jóváír, jóváírt, jóváírni). It occupies the verb-modifier slot when nothing else does, and it follows the verb when Focus or nem takes that slot. There is no second structural accusative. Do not conflate this dative Account with MERIT/ATT’s dative Target, and do not conflate the accusative MeasureP with blame’s accusative Target.
- ✓ A tanács minden számlának 0,3 ETH-t jóváírt. printed cloth · DAT Account + ACC MeasureP · prefix on the stem · indefinite 3sg
- ✓ egy számlának egy összeget jóváírni infinitive of the printed cloth · constructed
- ✓ A tanács minden számlának 0,3 ETH-t jóváír. present · prefix stays · indefinite
- ✓ A bank minden számlának 0,3 ETH-t jóváírt. Allocator = institution
- ✓ Az elszámolóház minden számlának 0,3 ETH-t jóváírt. Allocator = institution
- ✓ Az okosszerződés minden számlának 0,3 ETH-t jóváírt. Allocator = code · constructed
- ✓ A tanács minden számlának az összeget jóváírta. definite MeasureP · definite conjugation · not a second cloth
- ✓ A tanács minden számlának 0,3 ETH-t jóváírt a harmadik negyedév küszöbe miatt. outer Reason · miatt · not a second Account
- ✓ Minden számlának 0,3 ETH-t jóváírtak. impersonal 3pl · MeasureP stays ACC · Account stays DAT
- ✓ Jóváírt a tanács minden számlának 0,3 ETH-t? polar · no preverbal Focus · prefix stays
- ✓ A tanács nem írt jóvá minden számlának 0,3 ETH-t. verbal nem · prefix separates · no second Focus
- ✓ Nem 0,3 ETH-t írtak jóvá minden számlának? printed Focus+nem contrast · already on MERIT/ATT/blame · MeasureP host
- ✓ Nem minden számlának írt jóvá a tanács 0,3 ETH-t? Focus+nem · Account host · one slot · constructed
- ✓ A tanács minden számlának 0,3 ETH-t írt jóvá. MeasureP is the Focus host · prefix off the stem · constructed
- ✓ MERIT contrast: A befektetők a vállalkozónak a korai befejezést elismerték. MERIT · DAT Target + ACC Charge · credit-merit-hu.html
- ✓ ATT contrast: A tanács a vállalkozónak a korai befejezést tulajdonította. ATT · same Case letters · attribute-att-hu.html
- ✓ blame contrast: A bizottság a vállalkozót hibáztatta a késésért. blame · ACC = Target · blame-hu.html
- * A tanács minden számlát 0,3 ETH-t jóváírt. no DOC of MeasureP + Account as two bare ACC Themes
- * A tanács 0,3 ETH-t és minden számlát jóváírt. no coordination of two bare Themes
- * Nem 0,3 ETH-t minden számlának írt jóvá a tanács. Focus uniqueness · not both hosts
- * A tanács nem jóváírt minden számlának 0,3 ETH-t. nem takes the preverbal slot · prefix cannot stay
- * A tanács a számlát 0,3 ETH-vel jóváírta. instrumental amount not filed · MeasureP stays the accusative
- * A rossz időjárás minden számlának 0,3 ETH-t jóváírt. weather ≠ Allocator
- * A tanács minden számláról 0,3 ETH-t jóváírt. -ról Account = deduct / levon, not TO
- * A tanács nem írt jóvá minden számlának 0,3 ETH-nek. no GEN-neg rewrite of the MeasureP · accusative stays · not a fifth theta
Who is the Case object
✓ Mit írt jóvá a tanács minden számlának? WH = MeasureP · prefix separates
✓ Melyik számlának írt jóvá a tanács 0,3 ETH-t? WH = Account · whole dative DP · suffix does not strand
* Melyik számla írt nak jóvá a tanács 0,3 ETH-t? -nak is not a strandable preposition
* A számla 0,3 ETH-t kapott jóvá. no få / kap promotion of the dative Account on this root
MERIT / ATT / blame contrast (live pages · do not merge)
✓ A befektetők a vállalkozónak a korai befejezést elismerték. MERIT · DAT = Target · ACC = Charge · no MeasureP
✓ Nem a korai befejezést ismerték el a vállalkozónak? MERIT Focus+nem · el- separates · credit-merit-hu.html
✓ A tanács a vállalkozónak a korai befejezést tulajdonította. ATT · same DAT+ACC letters · no prefix · attribute-att-hu.html
✓ A bizottság a vállalkozót hibáztatta a késésért. blame · ACC = Target · no prefix · blame-hu.html
* A befektetők a vállalkozónak 0,3 ETH-t elismertek érdemként. MERIT verb + FIN MeasureP hybrid
MeasureP WH / LBC
Unlike creditMERIT, attributeATT, and blame, creditFIN has a verbal MeasureP. Amount and Denomination compose one measure object. Whole-QP pied-piping is free under Neg. Amount-only is free when the unit is bound. Left-branch extraction of Amount leaving the unit next to the verb is still out — same LBC record as deduct / sell / chargeFEE and the live creditFIN twins. WH is Focus, so jóvá- separates. The dative suffix takes the whole Account DP. It does not split the MeasureP, and it does not strand.
- ✓ Mennyi ETH-t írt jóvá a tanács minden számlának? whole MeasureP · prefix off
- ✓ Mennyit írt jóvá a tanács minden számlának? degree WH · U bound
- ✓ Melyik számlának írt jóvá a tanács 0,3 ETH-t? DAT Account WH · whole DP
- ✓ Ki írt jóvá minden számlának 0,3 ETH-t? Allocator WH · one preverbal host
- ✓ Ki írt jóvá mennyi ETH-t melyik számlának? Alloc > MeasureP > Account · one host preverbal · constructed
- ✓ Mit írt jóvá a tanács minden számlának? whole MeasureP as mit
- * Mennyit írt a tanács ETH-t jóvá minden számlának? LBC · U stranded
- * Mennyi írt ETH-t jóvá a tanács minden számlának? LBC · unit left beside the verb
- * Mit írt a tanács 0,3 jóvá minden számlának? what hijacks the object · stranded n
- * Mennyi ETH-t melyik számlának írt jóvá a tanács? two preverbal hosts
- ✓ MERIT pointer: Mit ismertek el a vállalkozónak? WH = Charge · not MeasureP · elismer
- * Mennyi ETH-t ismertek el a vállalkozónak? unless Charge recoded as a share
DAT Account ≠ DAT Target · ACC MeasureP ≠ Charge · ACC MeasureP ≠ blame’s Target
Dative Account = book-Recipient under Appl_TO — not the ascribee. The same -nak/-nek letters mark Target on elismer and tulajdonít. Accusative MeasureP = quantized ledger increment — not Charge content, not blame’s person, not sell Price, not pay Consideration. Different lemmas (jóváír vs elismer vs tulajdonít vs hibáztat / okol) and different licensers (Appl_TO / √CREDIT_LEDGER vs √ASCRIBE vs √ASCRIBE_FAULT). Collapsing FIN with MERIT or ATT because dative can mark both Account and Target is the error this split exists to block.
Superiority ranks Allocator > MeasureP > DAT Account > outer Reason. Amount and Denomination never compete as two verbal WH-items. Cheap NegQ association tracks the MeasureP. Challenging the Account wants that book already under Focus.
Focus + nem · one host · jóvá- separates
Hungarian has one preverbal Focus position. The Group C shell plate (chat 04) already uses it for live elismer and tulajdonít, and for blame, which has no prefix. On jóváír the verb modifier in that slot is the prefix jóvá-. When the slot is empty of Focus and of nem, the prefix stays on the stem. When a constituent is the unique Focus host, or when nem takes the slot, the prefix follows the verb. The prefix cannot share the slot. Separation is Move of the particle. It is not a new argument.
- ✓ A tanács minden számlának 0,3 ETH-t jóváírt. affirmative · prefix is the verb modifier · printed cloth
- ✓ 0,3 ETH-T írt jóvá a tanács minden számlának. MeasureP Focus · one host · prefix off
- ✓ MINDEN SZÁMLÁNAK írt jóvá a tanács 0,3 ETH-t. Account Focus · one host · prefix off
- ✓ Nem írt a tanács jóvá minden számlának 0,3 ETH-t? verbal nem · no second Focus · prefix off
- ✓ Nem 0,3 ETH-t írtak jóvá minden számlának? Focus+nem · MeasureP host · string already on the live HU pages
- ✓ Nem minden számlának írt jóvá a tanács 0,3 ETH-t? Focus+nem · Account host
- ✓ Nem az összeget írta jóvá a tanács minden számlának? definite MeasureP under Focus · írta · conjugation, not a new theta
- * 0,3 ETH-T MINDEN SZÁMLÁNAK írt jóvá a tanács. Focus uniqueness · not both
- * Nem 0,3 ETH-t minden számlának írt jóvá a tanács? Focus+nem still one host
- * Nem 0,3 ETH-t jóváírt a tanács minden számlának? prefix stays under Focus · parallel reject of MERIT el- staying on the verb
- ✓ MERIT parallel: Nem a korai befejezést ismerték el a vállalkozónak? el- separates · credit-merit-hu.html
- ✓ ATT parallel: Nem a korai befejezést tulajdonították a vállalkozónak? no prefix on tulajdonít · attribute-att-hu.html
- ✓ blame parallel: Nem a vállalkozót hibáztatta a bizottság a késésért? no prefix on hibáztat · blame-hu.html
A bare Nem immediately before the verb challenges the increment event. Challenging the sum wants the MeasureP already in Focus. Challenging the book wants the dative already in Focus. Negation does not grow a double object, does not turn the account into a second accusative, and does not rewrite ETH-t as ETH-nek. Hungarian -nak/-nek on számlának is the Account dative in the affirmative and under Neg alike. It is not a genitive of negation, and the spelling shared with possessors does not add a theta. Polish GEN-neg rewrites a measuring QP on live creditFIN · zapisać. It is not a Hungarian rule and it is not imported here.
Geometry · creditFIN ≠ creditMERIT ≠ attributeATT ≠ blame ≠ deduct ≠ payer
In A tanács minden számlának 0,3 ETH-t jóváírt, the board writes 0,3 ETH onto each account’s book. That is ledger INCREMENT, not ascription and not HAVE of goods. The account is Account. 0,3 ETH is MeasureP. HAS_ON_BOOKS holds after the event; spendability / payout is not entailed.
- ≠ creditMERIT / elismer. Group C names the roots on one Index 2 line. MERIT ascribes Charge to a Target (a vállalkozónak a korai befejezést elismerték): dative Target + accusative Charge, prefix el-, no MeasureP, no Account. FIN has MeasureP and Account and the lemma jóváír. Collapsing them because both can sit next to a Hungarian dative is the error the lexical entry was written to block. Live twin: credit-merit-hu.html.
- ≠ attributeATT / tulajdonít. ATT is content-ascribe: dative Target + accusative Charge, polarity open, no separable prefix, light-noun tulajdonítás when a noun is used. ATT has no MeasureP and no Account. Live twin: attribute-att-hu.html.
- ≠ blame / hibáztat / okol. Blame ascribes fault. Its accusative is the Target; Charge wears -ért. FIN’s accusative is MeasureP; FIN’s dative is the account. Neither blame lemma has a prefix to separate. Blame stays on hibáztat / okol.
- ≠ deduct. Shared MeasureP. Opposite polarity: deduct = FROM_SET decrement; creditFIN = TO_SET increment. Delative -ról/-ről on the account yields levon / deduct, not TO (*minden számláról 0,3 ETH-t jóváírt). Live twin: deduct.html. No Hungarian deduct page this tick.
- ≠ fizet / átutal / payGIVE. Index 2 Payment cites those two verbs. Pay writes MeasureP with Recipient HAVE. FIN’s HAS_ON_BOOKS is weaker; payout is a later verb (levon / terhel / átutal). átutal can cause a credit onto another account; that does not make átutal this root.
- ≠ attributeXFER. Shared CREDIT_LEDGER family. Hungarian ledger packaging for this tick is jóváír, not a second XFER page. XFER stays at attribute-xfer.html.
- ≠ sell / SWAP. Sell: Recipient HAS goods; Price stays inside a price phrase. This cloth is not SWAP. Earmark’s Purpose ≠ FIN’s outer miatt.
- ≠ separable gut / bound god-. German strands gut in ordinary V2. Norwegian god- never leaves the stem. Hungarian jóvá- stays in the neutral affirmative and leaves only under Focus or nem. Do not import either diagnostic as the Hungarian default.
- Missing defaults. Payout and spendability are not entailed. A later debit can reverse the book without making the original credit event false. HAS_ON_BOOKS ≠ physical HAVE ≠ RESTRICTED_FOR.
- Hybrid trap (§5.4). a vállalkozónak a megtakarítások 30 %-át elismerték can look MeasureP-shaped and still be MERIT (quantified Charge on elismer). Diagnostics: replaceable by ascribe (elismer); not by deposit (jóváír); weather can sit as MERIT/ATT Target and cannot sit as FIN Allocator. MERIT stays on elismer.
Shells, ApplP, and Case
Merge Merge
Allocator, MeasureP, and Account are selected. DAT Account and ACC MeasureP merge under √CREDIT_LEDGER. Amount and Denomination are inside one MeasureP, not two sisters of V. The prefix jóvá- is not an argument. No DOC and no ApplHAVE of goods.
Agree Agree
T agrees with the Allocator (NOM, φ). v agrees with ACC MeasureP. Definite conjugation (jóváírta / írta) tracks a definite measure. Indefinite conjugation (jóváírt / írt) is the printed QP. DAT Account is Case, not a second Agree for Goal HAVE.
Move Move
One Focus host moves preverbally. Focus and nem force jóvá- off the verb. Amount does not move out of the MeasureP (LBC). The dative suffix does not strand. Allocator does not share Spec,Focus with MeasureP or Account.
Filter Filter
Voice: weather is not an Allocator. The filter survives Neg and an outer causative wrap. Gold HAS_ON_BOOKS ≠ payout. No DOC of two bare accusatives. No GEN-neg fifth theta. MERIT elismer is a different root.
- M1√CREDIT_LEDGER merges with MeasureP ⟨Amount, Denom⟩
- M2DAT (-nak/-nek) merges with Account
- M3Voice merges Allocator
- A4T ↔ Allocator · NOM + φ
- A5v ↔ MeasureP · ACC (definite conjugation if the measure is definite)
- V6One Focus host → preverbal slot
- V7Prefix jóvá- separates under Focus / nem
- F8Voice filter · weather ≠ Allocator
- G9Gold · HAS_ON_BOOKS ≠ payout · LBC holds · no GEN-neg
Base tree (dative Account)
VoiceP [ Allocator = a tanács
(ReasonP) [ a küszöb miatt ] // optional, outer
ApplP_TO / book-Rec [ DAT minden számla
VP [ √CREDIT_LEDGER [ MeasureP [ Amount 0,3 ] [ N ETH ] ] ] ]
]
Focus field (one host · prefix leaves V)
FocusP [ MeasurePFOC or AccountFOC or nem ] · *both
VP [ írt [ jóvá- ] ]
— neutral affirmative: jóvá- stays on the stem (jóváírt)
— Focus / nem: jóvá- follows the verb (írt jóvá)
— no second structural accusative
— no GEN rewrite of ETH-t
jóváír assigns one structural accusative: the MeasureP. The Account wears dative. There is no frame in which MeasureP and Account are both bare accusative Themes. No low ApplHAVE of goods. No low ApplSWAP. No √ASCRIBE. High Appl / Affectee / outer Reason is extra when present. The prefix is lemma morphology (jóváír, jóváírt, jóváírta, jóváírni, and separated írt jóvá / írta jóvá). It is not a Norwegian bound prefix and it is not a German particle that strands in every main clause.
Neo-Davidsonian sketch (entry §7.2)
∃e [ INCREMENT(e)
∧ INIT(e, tanács)
∧ DEGREE(e, 0.3) ∧ UNIT(e, ETH)
∧ TO_SET(e, R) ∧ Hom(e, ⟨0.3, ETH⟩)
∧ JUSTIFIED_BY(e, Q3) ] // Reason optional
result: ∀y ∈ R. HAS_ON_BOOKS(y, ⟨0.3, ETH⟩) after e
Replace TO_SET with FROM_SET and INCREMENT with DECREMENT and the deduct entry drops out. The dative wrapper does not change the semantics. e2 = HAS_ON_BOOKS; e3 payout is not asserted. minden is the quantifier on R, not a second event.
Allocator filter
✓ Ki írt jóvá 0,3 ETH-t minden számlának?
✓ Az okosszerződés / az elszámolóház / a bank minden számlának 0,3 ETH-t jóváírt. institutional Initiator
* A rossz időjárás minden számlának 0,3 ETH-t jóváírt. not a ledger authority
✓ Amit az okosszerződés tett, az minden számlának 0,3 ETH-t jóváírni. constructed
* Amit a rossz időjárás tett, az minden számlának 0,3 ETH-t jóváírni. Culicover & Jackendoff
Inanimate Targets are welcome on MERIT and ATT. Inanimate Allocators fail on FIN unless construed as books or code. An inanimate Account is fine when it is a book (számlának).
Type A · outer permissive wrap
✓ Nem hagyta a tanács, hogy a bank minden számlának 0,3 ETH-t jóváírjon? outer Neg denies letting · constructed
* Nem hagyta a tanács, hogy a rossz időjárás minden számlának 0,3 ETH-t jóváírjon? weather still not inner Allocator
No promotion of the dative
✓ Minden számlának 0,3 ETH-t jóváírtak. 3pl impersonal · MeasureP stays ACC
* A számla 0,3 ETH-t kapott jóvá. Account does not raise on this root
* 0,3 lett ETH jóváírva minden számlának. Amount ≠ separate promote
Underivables (Hungarian FIN)
- * A rossz időjárás minden számlának 0,3 ETH-t jóváírt. weather / inanimate as Allocator
- * Amit a rossz időjárás tett, az minden számlának 0,3 ETH-t jóváírni. do-test · Allocator filter
- * Mennyit írt a tanács ETH-t jóvá minden számlának? LBC · U stranded
- * Mit írt a tanács 0,3 jóvá minden számlának? LBC · stranded n
- * A tanács minden számláról 0,3 ETH-t jóváírt. -ról ≠ TO · use levon / deduct
- * A tanács a rossz időjárásnak 0,3 ETH-t jóváírt. Account ≠ inanimate cause
- * A befektetők a vállalkozónak 0,3 ETH-t elismertek. MERIT cloth + FIN MeasureP hybrid
- * Az okosszerződés a vállalkozónak a korai befejezést elismerte. system Allocator ≠ MERIT Judge (coerced)
- * A tanács minden számlát 0,3 ETH-t jóváírt. no DOC of MeasureP + Account as two bare ACC Themes
- * Nem 0,3 ETH-t minden számlának írt jóvá a tanács. two Focus hosts
- * A tanács nem írt jóvá minden számlának 0,3 ETH-nek. no GEN-neg · MeasureP stays accusative
- * A számla 0,3 ETH-t kapott jóvá. dative Account does not promote
- ✓ institution / contract as Allocator: Az okosszerződés minden számlának 0,3 ETH-t jóváírt. book-keeper fine
N/A · not Hungarian FIN diagnostics
Sibling FIN pages omit diagnostics the language does not have. Hungarian FIN matches that list, with the local cuts filed above: Focus+nem, prefix separation, and definite vs indefinite conjugation.
- Norwegian bli / få, German werden, Dutch krijgen. N/A. There is no promotion pair that raises the dative Account. Impersonal jóváírtak keeps the MeasureP accusative. kap is a different verb.
- Genitive of negation. N/A. nem does not rewrite ACC MeasureP or DAT Account, and it does not invent a fifth theta. -nak/-nek on the account is dative in the affirmative and under Neg. Syncretism with a possessor spelling is not Polish GEN-neg.
- Romance en / ne. N/A. Quantity is the accusative MeasureP, or a degree WH with the unit bound.
- German V2 strand of gut / Dutch bij / Norwegian bound god-. N/A as the Hungarian default. jóvá- separates under Focus and nem only. The neutral affirmative keeps it on the stem. There is no particle jóvá to omit, and there is no V2 strand in every main clause.
NegQ pointer · association sites
Negative questions on creditFIN keep the FIN map. They do not invent a fifth theta name and they do not create a Charge. Neg sits in the preverbal slot and associates downward. Cheap inner associate = the MeasureP. The dative Account stays the book. Reason stays outer. Payout / spendability is systematically missing as a default Neg target — same moral as bet’s missing settlement. One polar question below is the string already printed as contrast on the live MERIT, ATT, and blame pages.
Hungarian NegQ / WH–Neg core (constructed · FIN map, except the printed contrast)
✓ Nem 0,3 ETH-t írtak jóvá minden számlának? printed contrast · credit-merit-hu.html · attribute-att-hu.html · blame-hu.html
✓ A tanács nem írt jóvá minden számlának 0,3 ETH-t?
✓ Nem minden számlának írt jóvá a tanács 0,3 ETH-t?
✓ Mennyi ETH-t nem írt jóvá a tanács minden számlának?
✓ Mennyit nem írt jóvá a tanács minden számlának? U bound
* Mennyit nem írt a tanács ETH-t jóvá minden számlának? LBC under Neg
✓ Melyik számlának nem írt jóvá a tanács 0,3 ETH-t?
✓ Miért nem írt jóvá a tanács minden számlának 0,3 ETH-t? Reason
✓ MERIT contrast: Nem a korai befejezést ismerték el a vállalkozónak? credit-merit-hu.html
* A rossz időjárás nem írt jóvá minden számlának 0,3 ETH-t?
* Nem írt a tanács jóvá minden számlának 0,3 ETH-nek? no GEN-neg under NegQ
Missing defaults: no payout-true; no spendability as e3. A bare Nem most readily challenges the increment event or the MeasureP. Challenging the Account wants that book already under Focus.
Open items
- Polish FIN. Live at credit-fin-pl.html (zapisać; printed Rada zapisała 0,3 ETH na rachunku, directional na rachunek). GEN-neg on the measuring QP is on that page. This page still does not import it. Do not invent
credit-merit-pl.html.
- Bulgarian FIN. Live at credit-fin-bg.html (записа; printed Съветът записа 0,3 ETH по сметката; по+Account). Beyond Index 2. No GEN-neg and no Focus on that page. Do not invent
credit-merit-bg.html.
- Instrumental amount. a számlát 0,3 ETH-vel jóváírni would flip the account into the accusative. It is not the printed cloth and it is not ranked as a second geometry. spec
- jóváírás. Event noun. Relative naturalness against the verb is scout-leaning. Possessor agreement is not ranked. Not a second root.
- Resultative jóváírva. A state reading can look like HAS_ON_BOOKS. It is not filed as a second voice or as promotion of the account. spec
- Hungarian deduct. FROM dual still English-primary at deduct. levon / terhel are not this tick.
- Debit as named dual. Does NegQ on a debit verb copy the FIN map with polarity flipped? Prediction: no MERIT debit.
- Hybrid QP Charge (§5.4). Controlled discrimination of quantified Charge on elismer vs true FIN MeasureP on jóváír — speaker check recommended in the lexical entry.
- Navajo sell. Still deferred. No new blame language. No creditMERIT Bulgarian or Polish page.
Corpus filenames
Primary extract for this micro-entry is the FIN half of Lexical_Entry_Credit_Argument_Structure (frames §3.2, Voice §4.1, MeasureP WH §5.2, shells §7.2) plus FIN NegQ association from Negative_Questions_Credit (Group C named-root split: elismer vs jóváír). Printed clothes: the contrast string already on the live MERIT, ATT, and blame pages, including Focus+nem Nem 0,3 ETH-t írtak jóvá minden számlának?. Focus plate: Attribute_GroupC_Larson_Shells (chat 04). Decrement dual: Lexical_Entry_Deduct_Argument_Structure. Chat packaging: Tritransitive chats 23 (NegQ on credit · two-root · Groups A–D), 25 (credit attitude vs transfer), and 35 (credit argument-structure acceptability). Index 2 Vols. 3, 6: Hungarian Attitude = hibáztat, okol, tulajdonít, elismer, jóváír. Index 2 Payment = fizet, átutal — not this lemma.
- Lexical_Entry_Credit_Argument_Structure.docx primary · √CREDIT_LEDGER · Allocator filter · MERIT ≠ FIN · Group C split
- Negative_Questions_Credit.docx Neg association · MeasureP LBC under Neg · missing payout · HU elismer vs jóváír
- Lexical_Entry_Deduct_Argument_Structure.docx FROM dual · decrement mirror
- WH_Raising_Denominations.docx / WH_Movement_Denominations_Deduct.docx MeasureP LBC · Amount vs unit
- Attribute_GroupC_Larson_Shells chat 04 · one preverbal Focus · prefix separates
- 23-negative-questions-on-credit-two-root-analysis.md chat 23 · two-root · named roots
- 25-credit-attitude-vs-transfer-verb.md chat 25 · elismer vs jóváír
- 35-credit-argument-structure-acceptability.md chat 35
- INDEX2_Verbs.txt HU Attitude = hibáztat, okol, tulajdonít, elismer, jóváír; Payment = fizet, átutal
Series placement: Hungarian sense×language twin of English creditFIN, German creditFIN, Dutch creditFIN, Norwegian creditFIN, Spanish creditFIN, French creditFIN, Italian creditFIN, Japanese creditFIN, and Mandarin creditFIN. Opens Group C FIN beside live creditMERIT · elismer and attributeATT · tulajdonít. Feeds the Index 2 Attitude line’s ledger cell and the measuring companion next to deduct / attributeXFER. Polish creditFIN is live at credit-fin-pl.html. Bulgarian creditFIN is live at credit-fin-bg.html. Does not invent a Bulgarian or Polish MERIT page, or Navajo. Speculation flagged.