Working paper. Spanish-only micro-entry opening the Group B Romance allocateGOAL line from Allocate_Earmark_Comparison §11.2 (destinar / asignar fondos a vs reservar / afectar para; DAT / a Goal clitic cheapness). Shares √ALLOCATE_GOAL geometry with the English twin allocate-goal.html and Japanese twin allocate-goal-ja.html. Constructed diagnostics diagnose a-Goal vs para-Purpose, DAT clitic, MeasureP integrity, DOC variability, and HAVE sliding; they are not spontaneous-speech citations. French twin is now live at allocate-goal-fr.html. Italian twin is now live at allocate-goal-it.html.
Constructed examples. Frames below are packaging hypotheses aligned with Group B notes (“Spanish destinar / asignar fondos a vs reservar / afectar para … DAT / à / a is the allocate Goal and can cliticize; that clitic is a cheap Neg associate … para remains Purpose. destinar a is the hinge verb: Goal-leaning allocate, still not full HAVE unless coerced toward conceder / otorgar.”). Designation-plus-Goal-address is e2. Spending, transfer out of the reserve, and HAVE are not entailed as defaults. Do not fake elicitation.
Beyond Index 2. Index 2 Spanish Allocation cites reservar; planificar only (Vol. 5 Romance line). It does not list asignar / destinar. Like chargeFEE · Spanish and creditFIN · Spanish, this root sits Beyond Index 2 as a Group B sense×language page. Keep a-Goal as the listed third; do not collapse to earmark’s para-Purpose or grant’s required HAVE.
Scout / deferred. Mandarin 拨给 / 分配给 and Navajo classificatory-stem packaging remain labeled speculation/scout. French and Italian twins are live. Relative productivity of asignar vs hinge destinar, and of light packing asignar fondos, is scout-leaning where the extract lists forms without ranking them. No fake elicitation.
Other allocate roots off this page. This page is allocateGOAL only (resources to an office). Scout/flag only — do not import NegQ: allocatePOST (asignaron a Kim al turno de noche · assignTASK posting), allocateASCRIBE (asignaron la culpa al contratista · attributeATT / blame), allocateSLOT (asignaron tres horas al problema · Time as Theme). Earmark has none of those distractors. Spanish asignar is also a common POST / task verb — that cloth is not this page.

Hierarchy

Same inventory as English allocateGOAL. Not three co-arguments of one V predicting a stable DOC and a transfer. Surface count can name the president, 14M BTC, and the ministry — but the listed third is a Goal individual y via Spanish a (DAT-cliticizable), not a Purpose property via para (earmark). HAVE(y,m) is optional / speaker-variable, not required. Writing those three as sisters of a grant-like Appl_HAVE predicts a productive DOC and a drawing-rights challenge to e2. Spanish keeps the middle — and the DAT clitic makes Goal look grant-adjacent without forcing HAVE.

Intended labeling (shared with English)

√ALLOCATEGOAL + Theme (MeasureP ⟨Amount, Denomination⟩ · ACC) + Goal (a-PP / Appl_GOAL / DAT clitic) · DESIGNATE · optional HAVE

Voice introduces Agent / Initiator with authority. Theme is the measuring inner argument — often a Measure QP ⟨n, U⟩ (14M BTC) under ACC. Goal is an individual (office, ministry, lab, budget line) under a / DAT le. Optional Purpose remains Type B para-PP / para+infinitive on top of Goal. Spending / transfer / HAVE are not listed as required results. Packaging (asignar, asignar fondos a, hinge destinar a) keeps one GOAL geometry.

14M BTC = one MeasureP. Orthography is not extra arity. Amount and Denomination share one Case object. Composition is V(Theme), not V(n)(U). Hom(m, e): the designation is measured by the quantity. Partitive en tracks quantity on the Theme — not a second object and not Goal (y tracks venue / dossier, not Goal).

Working hierarchy: Agent > Theme > Goal (> optional Purpose, Time, Source — high / peripheral). Theme outranks Goal for measuring; Goal can promote in passive (unlike earmark’s Beneficiary). What Group B Spanish changes is Case cloth (DAT clitic cheapness). What it does not change is the inventory.

Neo-Davidsonian sketch (comparison §3)

∃e [ DESIGNATE(e)
  ∧ THEME(e, m)
  ∧ GOAL(e, y)
  ∧ Hom(m, e) ]
  · HAVE(y, m) optional / speaker-variable — not listed as required

Contrast √EARMARK: DESIGNATE(e) ∧ RESOURCE(e,m) ∧ RESTRICTED_FOR(e,m,P) ∧ Hom(m,e) — no HAVE. Contrast grantGIVE: Appl_HAVE required. Spanish spells Goal as a / DAT, Purpose as para.

Spanish frames · Case clothes

Theme object under ACC; Goal as a-PP that can cliticize as DAT le and can promote. DOC is degraded / speaker-variable (?*asignaron al ministerio 14M) — between earmark (no) and grant (yes). Four-place surface: a-Goal + para-Purpose. Primary lemma: asignar / asignar fondos a. Hinge companion destinar a stays Goal-leaning allocate — not full HAVE unless coerced toward conceder / otorgar. Contrast reservar / afectar para (Purpose / earmark cloth) — flagged, not merged.

  1. ✓ El presidente asignó 14M BTC al ministerio. canonical · ACC Theme · a-Goal
  2. ✓ El presidente asignó 14M BTC al ministerio para tecnología. four-place · a-Goal + para-Purpose
  3. ✓ Asignaron fondos al laboratorio para comprar energía. Purpose infinitive · Type B extra
  4. ✓ Asignaron el excedente. Goal contextually bound
  5. ✓ Asignaron 14M para tecnología. Goal dropped · looks like earmark · packaging change
  6. ✓ Destinaron 14M BTC al ministerio. destinar hinge · Goal-leaning · same GOAL cloth
  7. ✓ Le asignaron 14M BTC al ministerio. DAT clitic · Goal · cheap Neg associate
  8. ? El presidente asignó al ministerio 14M BTC. DOC · degraded / speaker-variable
  9. ?* Asignó al ministerio 14M … same DOC cut · many prefer a-frame
  10. ✓ ¿No se asignaron 14M BTC al ministerio? Theme QP promotes / impersonal
  11. ✓ ¿No se le asignaron 14M BTC al ministerio? Goal DAT · grant-like · * on earmark Ben
  12. ✓ El ministerio fue asignado 14M BTC. Goal promote · register-sensitive · hinge vs earmark
  13. * ¿No se le afectaron 14M BTC al ministerio? as allocate Goal earmark contrast · afectar para · Ben ≠ Goal DAT
  14. ✓ ¿No se le concedieron 14M BTC al laboratorio? grant · HAVE Recipient promotes cleanly
  15. * Asignaron nueva tecnología 14M BTC. Purpose ≠ DOC object
  16. * Asignaron 14M BTC que gane Trump. Goal ≠ settlement Content
  17. * Asignaron a Kim al turno de noche. allocatePOST · off this page
  18. * Asignaron la culpa al contratista. allocateASCRIBE · off this page
  19. * Asignaron tres horas al problema. allocateSLOT · off this page

Passive · Theme vs Goal vs Purpose

✓ 14M BTC fueron asignados al ministerio. QP promotes as a whole

✓ Fondos asignados al ministerio … adjectival · e2 address state

✓ Al ministerio se le asignaron 14M BTC. Goal DAT · hinge vs earmark

* 14M fueron asignados BTC al ministerio. Amount ≠ separate promote

* BTC fueron asignados 14M al ministerio. U ≠ separate promote

* Nueva tecnología fue asignada 14M BTC. Purpose stays para-PP / infinitive

* Al ministerio se le afectaron 14M BTC. as allocate Goal earmark Ben contrast

a vs para · keep the attachments apart

✓ al ministerio Goal (individual) · core third on this root

✓ para tecnología / para nueva tecnología Purpose (use) · Type B extra on allocate

✓ para el ministerio odd as only third if a is available · Ben reading possible

✓ para comprar energía Purpose infinitive · Type B

* por 0,99 ETH on this root Theme₂ of SWAP / Price · that is trade / sell

* a que gane Trump on this root as listed third Proposition of bet

Companions · one GOAL geometry, one hinge, Purpose contrast

✓ asignar / asignar fondos a primary · ACC Theme · a-Goal

✓ destinar a hinge · Goal-leaning · not full HAVE unless coerced

✓ reservar / afectar para Purpose / earmark cloth · Index 2 Allocation · contrast only

✓ conceder / otorgar grant · Appl_HAVE · drawing-rights default

? destinar para Purpose-leaning packing · do not merge with a-Goal

MeasureP WH · denomination diagnostics

WH forces Amount ≠ Denomination inside one Case object. Verbal WH sees the Theme MeasureP under ACC, not unit and degree as two objects of allocate. Same MeasureP pattern as payGIVE’s Amount, sell’s Price, chargeFEE’s fee, deduct’s decrement, bet’s Stake, and earmark’s Resource — here the MeasureP is the addressed Theme (ACC), and Goal stays a selected a-PP / DAT (or promoted).

  1. ✓ ¿Cuánto BTC asignó el presidente al ministerio? unit bound
  2. ✓ ¿Cuánto asignó el presidente al ministerio? unit contextually bound
  3. ✓ ¿Cuánto de qué asignaron al ministerio? n and U inside host
  4. ✓ ¿En qué / de qué / en qué denominación asignaron 14M?
  5. ✓ ¿Qué asignaron al ministerio? bare WHAT · Theme
  6. * ¿Qué asignaron 14M al ministerio? LBC · stranded n
  7. * ¿Qué 14M asignaron al ministerio? U does not invert over n
  8. ✓ ¿A quién asignaron 14M BTC? Goal
  9. ✓ ¿Para qué asignaron 14M BTC? Purpose extra
  10. ? ¿A qué asignaron 14M BTC? Goal is an individual, not a use
  11. * ¿A quién afectaron 14M BTC? as allocate Goal a-Goal is wrong cloth on earmark-leaning afectar para
  12. ✓ ¿Cuánto BTC a quién asignaron? Superiority · Theme > Goal
  13. ✓ ¿Cuánto BTC le asignaron? en / quantity · DAT Goal

Superiority ranks Agent > Theme > Goal > (optional Purpose / Time / Source). Amount and Denomination never compete as two verbal WH-items. Cheap NegQ association tracks the Case object: ACC MeasureP under asignar, plus DAT Goal clitic as a Romance cheap associate (the Group B reason allocate looks more grant-like than earmark). en tracks quantity; y tracks venue / dossier, not Goal.

Geometry · allocateGOAL ≠ earmark ≠ grantGIVE ≠ vender ≠ acreditarFIN

In El presidente asignó 14M BTC al ministerio, the BTC is addressed to an office. The ministry need not HAVE drawing rights. Spending is not e2. That is Allocation with Goal flavour — between Purpose-restriction (earmark / reservar / afectar para) and conferral (grant / conceder / otorgar).

Shells, ApplP, and Case

Base tree (Spanish · Larson-shell sketch)

VoiceP  [ el presidente
  VP  [ √ALLOCATE_GOAL / √ASIGNAR   [ MeasureP  [ Amount 14M ] [ N BTC ] ] ]
  GoalP / Appl_GOAL  [ a  [ el ministerio ] ]   · DAT clitic le
  (PurpP  [ para  [ tecnología ] ]) ]

Packaging (same geometry):
  asignar · asignar fondos a · destinar a (hinge)
  — Goal stays a / DAT; Purpose stays para

Voice introduces Agent with AUTHORITY(x,e) as a selectional / felicity conjunct — not a fifth argument. Presidents, treasuries, CFOs, protocols, and statutes pass; bare persons need a hat; weather fails. Theme sits as Incremental Theme of the designation under ACC. Goal attaches as Appl_GOAL / wrapper-K spelled a / DAT — listed enough to cliticize and promote, not listed enough to force HAVE the way grant’s Recipient does. Purpose, when present, is Type B para outside the first phase. Putting required HAVE in is how the grant cloth (conceder / otorgar) is written — a different root packaging.

Spanish assigns ACC to the Theme. Goal is a-PP / DAT (or promoted). Purpose, Time, Source are further PPs. Passive / impersonal promotes Theme QP as a whole, or Goal via DAT / subject (✓), never Amount alone, never U alone, never Purpose into subject.

Voice filter · authority

✓ ¿Quién / qué asignó 14M BTC al ministerio?

✓ El presidente / el Congreso / la ley / la tesorería asignó … office / statute / body

* El mal tiempo asignó 14M BTC al ministerio. not an Allocator

✓ 14M BTC fueron asignados al ministerio por el presidente.

✓ Al ministerio se le asignaron 14M BTC por el presidente. Goal DAT + por-Agent

Same authority filter as earmark; stronger than deduct’s Allocator-ish filter; different from blame’s Judge filter.

DOC continuum · Romance DAT makes Goal look grant-adjacent

* El presidente afectó al ministerio 14M BTC. earmark · no DOC

? El presidente asignó al ministerio 14M BTC. allocate · degraded / variable

✓ La fundación concedió al laboratorio 14M BTC. grant · productive DOC / HAVE

✓ Le asignaron 14M BTC. DAT clitic · cheap Neg associate · Group B diagnostic

NegQ cheapness follows the cloth that was actually built. If DOC is accepted, the ministry is a cheap associate. If only the a-frame is accepted, the Theme QP is cheap and the Goal needs a / le. The DAT clitic is why Romance allocate looks more like grant than earmark does — without forcing HAVE.

Underivables (Spanish · this root)

  1. * Nueva tecnología fue asignada 14M BTC. Purpose ≠ ACC
  2. * 14M fueron asignados BTC al ministerio. Amount ≠ separate passive
  3. * BTC fueron asignados 14M al ministerio. U ≠ separate passive
  4. * ¿Qué asignaron 14M al ministerio? LBC · stranded n
  5. * Asignaron 14M BTC que gane Trump. Goal ≠ Content
  6. * El mal tiempo asignó 14M BTC al ministerio. Voice filter
  7. * ¿No se le afectaron 14M BTC al ministerio? as allocate Goal earmark Ben cloth · use this root / grant
  8. * Asignaron a Kim al turno de noche. POST distractor · off page
  9. * Asignaron la culpa al contratista. ASCRIBE distractor · off page
  10. * Asignaron tres horas al problema. SLOT distractor · off page
  11. * ¿A quién no afectaron 14M BTC? as allocate Goal a-Goal is allocate cloth on earmark

NegQ pointer · association sites

Negative questions on allocateGOAL read the Allocation-plus-Goal geometry; they do not invent a fourth theta name. Neg sits high and associates downward. Cheap inner associate = Theme QP in the a-frame, plus DAT Goal clitic (Group B cheap associate). Purpose stays para when present. Spend-true missing as default; HAVE challenge speaker-variable.

Spanish NegQ / WH–Neg core (from Allocate_Earmark_Comparison §11.2 + earmark NegQ)

✓ ¿No asignó el presidente 14M BTC al ministerio?

✓ ¿No asignaron 14M BTC al ministerio para tecnología?

✓ ¿No se asignaron 14M BTC al ministerio?

✓ ¿No se le asignaron 14M BTC al ministerio? Goal DAT · * on earmark Ben

* ¿No se asignaron 14M BTC …? / ¿No se asignaron BTC 14M …? as split Amount/U

✓ ¿Cuánto BTC no asignaron al ministerio?

* ¿Qué no asignaron 14M al ministerio? LBC under Neg

✓ ¿A quién no asignaron 14M BTC? Goal

✓ ¿Para qué no asignaron 14M BTC? Purpose extra

? ¿A qué no asignaron 14M BTC? Goal ≠ use-property

* ¿A quién no afectaron 14M BTC? as allocate Goal earmark contrast

✓ ¿No siguen esos fondos asignados al ministerio? e2 state

HAVE follow-up No — el ministerio nunca recibió derechos de disposición: speaker-variable on allocate (idle on earmark; challenges grant). Missing defaults: no spend-true; Purpose-complete missing. Partial answers that swap quantity confirm the Theme cut. DAT clitic le is the Romance cheap Goal associate earmark will fail.

Group B packaging · this tick Spanish GOAL only

Group B (Spanish, French, Italian) keeps the Goal vs Purpose Case split under Neg, with DAT / à / a as the allocate Goal that can cliticize. This tick is Spanish allocateGOAL only — asignó 14M BTC al ministerio (ACC Theme, a-Goal / DAT le); Purpose para extra; hinge destinar a Goal-leaning without forcing HAVE. English twin live at allocate-goal.html; Japanese twin at allocate-goal-ja.html. French twin live at allocate-goal-fr.html. Italian: destinare / stanziare a vs accantonare / vincolare per — pointed, not deepened. Label speculation; do not fake elicitation.

Open items

Index 2 citations for this class

Class table. Volume 3 Allocation names reserve, book, schedule, appropriate, earmark, allocate. Index 2 lists book, reserve, and schedule only — not allocate, not earmark. Spanish Index 2 Allocation cites reservar; planificar. The table is that Index 2 class. This page and the English / Japanese allocateGOAL twins / earmark are Beyond Index 2 companions (Goal flavour vs Purpose flavour).
Allocation citations from Index 2
CodeLanguageIndex 2 citationAs printed
ENEnglishbook, reserve, schedule · Beyond: earmark, allocateGOAL · allocateGOAL · JA · allocateGOAL · ES · allocateGOAL · FR · allocateGOAL · ITVol. 3
ESSpanishreservar; planificar · Beyond: allocateGOAL · asignar / destinarVol. 5. Index 2 prints one Romance line: reservar / réserver / prenotare; planificar / planifier / pianificare. This cell is the Spanish pair in that order.
FRFrenchréserver; planifier · Beyond: allocateGOAL · allouer / affecter àVol. 5. French pair from the same Romance line.
ITItalianprenotare; pianificare · Beyond: allocateGOAL · destinare / stanziare aVol. 5. Italian pair from the same Romance line.
HUHungarianlefoglal / foglal, beütemezVols. 3, 6
BGBulgarianрезервирам / запазвам, насрочвамVols. 3, 6
PLPolishrezerwować / zarezerwować, planować / zaplanowaćVols. 3, 6

Languages Index 2 does not list for this class are left off the table. Spanish Index 2 Allocation is reservar; planificar — this page is Beyond Index 2. French twin live; Italian DAT-clitic cheapness remains the next Romance Goal diagnostic — scout only this tick.

Corpus filenames

Primary extract for this micro-entry; companions supply earmark sister geometry and Neg association. DOCX originals under the Tritransitive lit tree (lit/grok-tritransitive/files/). Text extract used this tick: /workspace/allocate_earmark_extract.txt (from Allocate_Earmark_Comparison.docx §11.2 Group B). Sister pages: allocate-goal.html · allocate-goal-ja.html.

Series placement: Spanish sense×language twin of English allocateGOAL and Japanese allocateGOAL; lexical-entry companion to earmark, grantGIVE, book / reserve / schedule, deduct, creditFIN · Spanish, chargeFEE · Spanish, and sell · Spanish. Feeds the Allocation cell of the Spanish measuring grid with Goal as listed third and HAVE sliding. Does not reopen Type A causation-chain papers. Does not invent FR/IT/ZH/NV elicitation. Does not import allocatePOST / ASCRIBE / SLOT.